360
submitted 3 weeks ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

The current situation bears structural similarities to three major accounting frauds: Enron (2001), WorldCom (2002), and Lucent Technologies (2000).

Lucent, once America’s largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer, grew revenue through vendor financing arrangements. The company lent money to telecom carriers to purchase Lucent equipment, booking the equipment sales as revenue while the loans appeared as receivables. When carriers couldn’t repay, Lucent took $8.7 billion in writeoffs.

Lucent’s DSO peaked at 64 days before the fraud became public. Nvidia’s current 53-day DSO remains below that threshold but exceeds its historical baseline by the same percentage that preceded Lucent’s collapse.

Enron used Special Purpose Entities to hide debt and inflate revenue. These entities existed as legally separate companies but were economically controlled by Enron. The structure created artificial revenue through transactions with entities Enron itself funded.

The xAI SPV structure mirrors this approach. Nvidia provides equity capital to an entity that exists primarily to purchase Nvidia products. The transaction appears as an arms-length sale in Nvidia’s accounting, but economically, Nvidia is funding its own revenue.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 117 points 3 weeks ago

I mean… a few people have been pointing out this shit doesn’t make sense for a few months now.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 35 points 3 weeks ago

I know. The content of the article is a useful dissection of the funky accounting going on, but it's stuck with a beside-the-point headline, unfortunately.

[-] Cochise@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 3 weeks ago

But as today was a machine they listened, because nowadays we trust AI more than people.

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The stock market is wholly price controlled by the biggest players via dark pools, algorithms, AI and HFT and that there will not be an appreciable crash ever again because of this. So it's going to be very interesting as it continues to make less and less sense and we continue to get ever-higher numbers coming from Wall Street.

Edit: downvoted every time man, people really want to believe in the stock market (or maybe they just want to believe it can go down in flames lol). Well that's cool, the big players I'm sure are glad for your existence. But you'll all come around.

Edit: Oh would you look at that, another week, another up by several thousand points. Come back and hit me up when it crashes, boys!

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

That would be way too smart for reality.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

That would require really large numbers of the most selfish people ever to work together as a group and not break ranks even when self-interest dictates they should.

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's being handled by algorithms and AI, not people. It requires only a relatively few people at the top of the largest hedge funds and financial institutions, all of whom are benefiting from it. Truth be told, they don't look at themselves as bad guys and in all honesty, they might not be. Aside from the unfortunate side effect of giving them the power to pick winners and losers, literally everyone benefits from a market that can't implode.

It's not like it isn't being said openly in certain corners of the Internet. Anyone who "breaks ranks" and says it will just be downvoted and ignored as a crank (as my simple comments here can attest). In the meantime, the indices will fluctuate and react to the news giving a veneer of authenticity, yet the march will move ever upward (as it has, manifestly, since the last "real" crash, 2008).

For those who think this is just bullshit, I would suggest that you read a fantastic book called Flash Boys and then contemplate that it was written in 2014. The author, Michael Lewis, had this to say, also, 11 years ago.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The comforting thing about the conspiracy mindset is that it means someone is in control. They might be evil or selfish or AI or lizard people whatever but at least the world makes sense, has a structure and someone has it nailed down. People crave this security and will seek to build evidence for it. They may not "like" the picture they end up drawing but they like having a picture because it feels solid and graspable. Understandable.

The scary truth is none of it makes sense, there is no one with their hand on the tiller and anything can happen.

[-] eestileib 11 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, as soon as somebody starts missing payments things are gonna deleverage fast

[-] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

This has been said ever since cryptocurrency became a thing.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago

“Vibe Revenue” is my new favorite term.

[-] jaredwhite@humansare.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Vibe revenue courtesy of their vibe business plan to acquire more vibe customers. 😎

[-] nuko147@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago
[-] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 18 points 3 weeks ago

Please make it 2025 Santa, that's all I ask.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It will burst the moment Democrats get back in power and not one second before, by design

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

It didn’t really take ai to figure that one out.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

GPU spot pricing on third-party compute marketplaces provides additional evidence. Vast.ai and RunPod.io, platforms where users rent GPU compute capacity by the hour, show H100 spot prices declining from $3.20 per hour in August 2025 to $2.12 per hour as of November 20, 2025. This 34% price decline directly contradicts claims of insatiable demand.

This is interesting… especially to someone interested in cheap rentals.

The cynical part of me figures a GPU “crash” would result in a lot of hardware liquidation (eg Nvidia repossessing GPUs and throwing them out) and not affect prices much. Heck, prices may get even worse with fewer providers bothering to host GPU instances… but maybe not?

I would love for a mega crash to send H100 prices underground, and knock down other GPUs in a cascade.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago

H100 spot prices declining from $3.20 per hour in August 2025 to $2.12 per hour as of November 20, 2025

This is probably the key metric to lead to a crash. The US empire is all in on NVIDIA other AI oligarchy, and western chip industry is all in on making only datacenter AI chips. Computers, and soon phones, will become grossly overpriced and unbuyable. Even if TSMC makes only and all of the "AI brains chips", there's not enough memory production to package them all into GPUs, and then actually less TSMC production/profits even though it is positioned as a winner no matter which hardware company succeeds. This can also crash economy and consumer inflation.

The actual worst circular financing AI deal is not mentioned, and involves an older traditional scam. If you buy 1 share in a private company for $1000, then the company boasts a PR where its new value is $1000/share. VC firms like Softbank have always done this to boost their accounting value, because they bought millions of share at $100 or less, and small amounts of new shares makes whole stake appear to succeed.

Anthropic recently made a circular deal with NVDA and MSFT investing $15B in Anthropic, but at over double its valuation. This gives Anthropic shareholders over $150B in "value". Circularly, Anthropic will be paying $30B to the above 2 companies.

xAI and StarX also made scam new valuations for each other early this year. They just swapped shares among themselves, while imagining a new $ amount for each where accounting permits the imaginary to be real.

[-] flango@lemmy.eco.br 21 points 3 weeks ago

The “Vibe Revenue” Admission

On November 14, 2025, at the Web Summit conference in Lisbon, multiple AI company CEOs acknowledged this dynamic in public for the first time.

Brian Chesky, CEO of Airbnb, stated: “There’s a lot of vibe revenue in AI. Companies are talking about billions in pipeline that may never materialize.”

Vinod Khosla, venture capitalist and prominent AI investor, told the audience: “Ninety-five percent of AI startups will fail. The question is which five percent become Google.”

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, said: “We’re in uncharted territory. Nobody knows if this scales to AGI or hits a wall at GPT-5.”

These admissions carry weight because they contradict the growth narratives supporting current valuations. OpenAI, valued at $157 billion in its most recent funding round, reported $3.7 billion in revenue for 2025 according to The Information. The company simultaneously disclosed operating expenses of $13 billion, resulting in a $9.3 billion annual cash burn.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Good grief!

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

It's an interesting read. But it doesn't account for external investments pushing up the total capital flow. Entities like the Saudis, Dubai, and Qatar, as well as many sovereign funds have a lot of cash on hand to pump into the system and keep the party rolling.

I wonder if the short-selling models account for these anomalies.

[-] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 weeks ago

This bubble will pop because the profits won't come close to what is needed. They're betting the house on developing agi with models that are completely unsuitable for that purpose. Even their redefined agi they most likely won't reach. Basing agi on llm is fundamentally unsound, therefore can't live up to the hype and won't get the record adaptation required for profitability.

The arabs can pump all their fossil fuel money into this and keep the development going for much longer than it should, but even they will want to see returns at one point.

[-] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wish you were right, but ponder the last point - do they really want returns ? For the oligarchy it’s just about maintaining power, arabs bought crazily expensive us fighter jets for years with zero 'returns', except political favours. In this case datacenters also support fossil demand expansion narratives. Has anybody done the math of the scale of those 'reserves', compared to the bubble ?

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

do they really want returns ?

Some portion of their investment is strategic, and may earn non-monetary returns that they would rather have than money.

But they do still need some of their investments to actually return money. Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund might not be doing too hot right now, and has almost all of its cash tied up in illiquid investments (some of which appear to be at risk of going bad).

They've been quietly trying to unload some of their more liquid assets, and outsiders (and some reporters who claim insider access) say it's because they're running low on cash.

If that happens while oil prices remain low (or while they lose market share from artificially lowering their own production) they might not be able to afford to ride out these investments long enough to actually see a return. The whole thing looks financially fragile, and governments can only prop up bad businesses for so long.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's a weird investment for Zionist dictatorship allies. Unclear why their economy needs massive datacenters, but like the US, Skynet is appealing population control, and governments will be leading consumers of datacenters.

Still, there is a shortage of AI chips (we are told... only because government is the only real customer), and diverting them to where power can be built, makes both AI chips more expensive for US, and buyers unable to compete on operating (power) costs.

Same issue with "profit from China" policies. H20s are great inference cards and cheap and should be purchasable in US outside of Chinese ebay sellers. This week announcement that NVIDIA will be allowed to sell H200s to China, is just giving all US money to NVIDIA policy.

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 13 points 3 weeks ago

Wow that... Didn't take AI at all.

People have been pointing this out for months.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's true then? Ai will make people lose their (ai) jobs?

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

If you can't envision a robust and healthy economy based on the ability to create an endless stream of pictures of comically obese men and videos of same, I don't want to participate in that economy.

This is the future. We no longer need a connection to physical reality, as long as bits flow, a few people can create money from that.

The rest can 3D print what they need.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

Site doesn't load

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
360 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4872 readers
1965 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS