Did I read that correctly?? 1.6 GB of registry files??
Holy shit. I just had this feeling early on to skip the early access. Seems like I made a good choice.
I skip almost all early access games. Only one I made an exception for was Factorio.
I remember Scott Manley asked someone important on the dev team of ksp2 how they approached the 2 body problem. They guy gave a vague answer that they had solved it. If that were true they would have a Nobel Prize but they don't. So then and there I decided that KSP2 will not get my money. Which sucks because I have put a little over 2000 hours into KSP1.
"Solved it" for a game just means "approximated it well enough that the average user won't notice".
I don't think that was the way he portrayed it. He made it seem like they really solved the 2 body problem. Scott Manley even made a comment about how grand that was. I really wish I could find the video to better show what I mean.
edit: here is one of him recalling it. https://youtu.be/vu22bFtZgKg?feature=shared&t=2294
2 body orbits shouldn't be a problem. They are easily solvable. 3 body systems are the ones that are problematic.
Yeah, he says n-body problem in the video I linked above. I have no idea why I am saying 2 body problem.
Funnily enough, there is an n-body mod for ksp1, which makes interplanet interactions more realistic (in fact, the mod has to slightly change the default system to stop the moons of Jool from slingshotting each other out) and allows advanced maneuvers like ballistic capture and lagrange points
And as someone who couldn't even land on the Mun without crashing, I downloaded that mod and unsurprisingly found things even harder since it disables the standard maneuvers.
It is not a beginner's mod, the fact that its most often used with packs like RP-1 should say how hard it is
Problematic in a computer model or...? How does real space travel account for the gravitational pull of 3+ celestial bodies?
Roughly, that's why long distance missions need mid course correction burns.
Seems like horrible dev practice to place save data of any kind in the Windows registry lmao. I get that it's designed for storing user data in some respects but the registry is an old and fickle solution to setting global variables important for communication between processes and applications.
If you're storing data that's only ever needed by your own application, especially if it isn't OS-related, you shouldn't mess with the registry. Not only does it not have the performance you'd expect for most circumstances, but the registry has a real performance and stability impact even when outside of your app.
What's worse, imo, is that this data is difficult to access for making backups, utilising cloud synchronization, and cross compatibility of your app.
Unity is a lot more borked than I thought, but KSP devs should probably be careful with what data serialisation APIs they mess with.
All the Unity game engine self-destruction choices got to them ;)
As a Unity dev of 6 years, playerPreffs (the unity system that stores data in the registry) are a good place to store small amounts of data in a dictionary style structure quickly without creating your own data system. But they are extremely limited in the types of data they can hold and the control a dev has over them. Whenever I see playerPreffs used I think the dev must-have needed something quick and easy. They may have also created their own registry save system in that case should be an easy fix. (De)Serializing json or even custom binary files in compartmented files in a defined folder like StreamingAssets gives much more flexibility in data types and control. You can see playerPreffs limitations in the documentation below: (https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/PlayerPrefs.html)
thefuck, btw how proton handle the registry on steam deck/desktop linux?, that can happen there?
Wine registry, and yes, but only within your Wine sandbox
So, what's the advantage of using windows registry? I'm mainly using linux, so the concept of registry sounds really strange in my head.
When the developers don't abuse it, it's a central place where all the settings and configuration parameters should be.
There's no main advantage, it's just a different concept.
Linux sysadmin for the past 25 years here that also has to work with Windows servers.
Basically a network/local/user specific configuration database. Playing with it can break apps that expect their config to be in it, or to be of the type expected, even though they shouldn’t.
This about:config on Firefox but system wide. It’s your ~/.config and /etc/ folders in one database format, also manageable with AD and proper permissions.
If you're using a Linux distribution: are you familiar with gsettings or some equivalent?
Is It a frontend for dconf? I have to admit I never tinkered with any dconf stuff before as I live mostly in terminal and web browsers. Does dconf share similarities with windows registry?
Yes exactly, they're similar. I guess there's a universal desire for tree like data stores.
That was some pretty entertaining reading lol yikes.
These bugs keep getting more wild.
Yikes
I'm sure it'll be patched soon
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
Comments.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities: