434
He is turning it into Mar-a-Lago.
I get it, he wants to make it feel like home if he's gonna be living there for the rest of his life.
He won't be stepping down from this gig, he knows the consequences he'll have to face if he becomes a normal citizen again.
I get it, he wants to make it feel like home if he’s gonna be living there for the rest of his life.
Much of the White House was decorated by Jackie Kennedy, and her husband ended up spending the rest of his life there, so maybe this will be the same thing...
I like the cut of your jib
load more comments
(2 replies)
Guess he's really not planning to leave if he's doing this much redecorating.
Kings did this intentionally to prove their wealth and power while the masses begged for food. It helped them illustrate that there was a pecking order.
Holy shit is that tacky.
Can you imagine the president having nothing better to do than golf, take pictures of the bathroom, and fuck children?
Ugh. I don't love the green, but that after picture is hideous.
load more comments
(1 replies)
When he's done with all the renovations the white house is gonna be Epsteins Pedo Party Palace.
This administration does not have their priorities straight. Not paying employees, firing thousands of people, this obsession with gold. The end of USAID, so much more, it's just so disheartening.
It isn't your fucking house asshole.
Yes it is. No one is stopping him from anything. He could nuke the entire planet and he’d rule over rubble.
Trump has no taste. If it is the most expensive then it is the most appropriate, but only if it's gold and white.
What a disgrace. He's tearing up history and smearing his gold flake feces all over the place.
Try to tell me this fuck isn't intending on staying past 2028. :/
He's been selling Trump 2028 merch for a while now. His new campaign slogan is "Rewrite the rules."
His old strategist Bannon said to The Economist just last week that Trump will serve a third term, and that their criteria for success is MAGA in control of every American institution, forever
No, not hyperbole, damn near exact quote
...how many bugs -and I don't mean the crawly critters- do you think are making it into the whitehouse through all these renovations?
In the fantasy world of a functional US government following the Trump regime, how do you even handle this? Everything he touches is a gigantic liability.
I think at this point I'd have the WH converted into a museum highlighting shit like the dangers of misinformation, and just pick up ops from one of the military bases that we're sure Trump never set foot in.
During Nixon's renovations he embedded so many bugs and wires in the walls it interfered with the structural integrity of the plaster.
So there's precedent for counter-surveillance scrubdowns.
But, that only happens if the WH is taken back from the dictator inside it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The whole thing is coming down. You know it.
I'm sure the only thing they don't have an issue with is the name "white house".
Funny that. I bet there’s a press release soon: “we found structural damage in the WH” followed by a complete demolishment.
-
Holy shit how fucked are are that this is even news. I hate this so much.
-
I hate when a stupid motherfucker is right because, outside the gold, the marble looks way fuckin better than that green.
-
To claim that marble and gold is somehow more era appropriate for Lincoln is pretty standard Trump-alternate-reality delusion fueled by narcissism.
I think the marble looks weird as fuck and would make the bathroom uncomfortable to be in, while the green tile is very pleasing and cozy, with nice accents
Gold is tacky as fuck and that dude wouldn't know good taste even if it was sold at the bottom of a ketchup bottle.
Agreed on all counts aside from 2.
The original had class and functionality, complete with datum lines and concealed lighting. It was aged, for sure, but the design comes together and looks comfortable.
The new one is literally just slabs of maybe real marble but i doubt it. There's no demarcation between floor and ceiling. It's as if someone just used the paint bucket tool and clicked fill. The lighting is atrocious; if you're in the bath you cop an eyeful of a glare bomb.
I'd take the original any day. Would have probably just added sheer curtains to the windows.
That kind of marble is pretty dated in 2025 too, it's 5-10 years overdone at this point.
load more comments
(3 replies)
For a heterosexual man he sure seems preoccupied with interior design and his makeup.
He is also as terrible at both as the stereotypical heterosexual man.
load more comments
(2 replies)
This Kidfucker’s Friend saw Saddham’s palace and decided it looked like a good idea.
He shoulda stayed awake for the end of that vine.
My big takeaway from these pictures is that one can take a shit by an unfrosted floor-to-ceiling window to the outside
This is how you make America great!!!!!!!!!!! Just non-stop winning! Fuck the kids and all humans in the borders. Food and healthcare are boring. A renovated bathroom, that’s amazing!!!
SNAP ends Tomorrow! I LOVE TRUMP!
-Poor Republicans!
Federal judges are forcing them to fund snap :)
GOOD thing Republicans LISTEN to Judges!
He is certainly following Nero's footsteps.
A monumental rotating dining room certainly isn't beyond him. There's another wing to destroy after all.
He should be careful. A doddery old stroke victim with Alzheimer's could slip on all that polished marvel.
Lincoln's ghost will push a bitch.
It's hideous.
I hope he slips in there those rock edges look unforgiving enough to do the job
He's not getting the damage deposit back
Does any one have photos over before the 1940s redo. Because I’m sure it didn’t look like thay
The after pictures is like a Minecraft house where they just used the same blocks for everything and a gold fixtures mod.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
434 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26261 readers
3294 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS