67
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to c/agora@sh.itjust.works

I saw that a post was made in !main@sh.itjust.works about defederation about a month ago, an admin commented to make a post here to discuss defederation, but the post was never made.

https://maga.place/ is very obviously a small community with no real substance to it, but I saw an antivax post to !science_memes@mander.xyz and was surprised it still exists.

Anyways I don't really have a lot to say but uh, I recently hit a full year on this great instance 😊 (old account @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works)

(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I navigated the instance some. The amount of disinformation on its posts is concerning to me. I hadent personally been effected but the potential is worrisome.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I don't know her Mariah smile

But honestly, if someone has an account on that instance it's probably good for them to be able to read posts and comments on other instances. Of course once in a while that will lead to some trolling and individual users will be banned. If that's too much then the whole instance should be defederated. But I don't think it should be preemptive. I see more potential for good than harm.

Things that should be preemptive: accessibility, codes of conduct.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

They can still read all of the instances without logging in. The entire reason to have an instance like that is because they can do what they want there. Other instances won't put up with it.

[-] Shihali@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

I think we should be wary and keep them on a short leash, but I don't see them causing enough trouble here in October 2025 to defederate. If I'd wanted a safe space I would have gone to Beehaw.

[-] this@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Yes for defederation

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What their homepage looks like...

Defed that nonsense please

[-] emmy67@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

They should be defederated.

Their hateful ideas should have no place here.

[-] Mangoguana@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Defederate, we saw what the_donald become. If anything, to avoid the bots and agitators.

[-] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

The post on Science Memes got downvoted into oblivion, which is funny.

But yeah, we should probably defed these pos.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago

Defederate. Let the right-wingers have their echo-chambers in isolation

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

And keep your own echo-chamber? I'm very disappointed in this community... I haven't come across any posts from that community but their front page looks no worse than news@lemmy.ml just with a different slant. They don't even have any comments so the community must be tiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

ooooh i also love banning everyone with an opinion that differs from mine. I do it in all my communities. Cleanse the nonbelievers! Purify our echo chamber!

chants

Purify our echo chamber!

Purify our echo chamber!

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That 'differing opinion' is somebody else's right to exist

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 25 points 2 weeks ago

Hate is not an opinion and hate is all that maga stands for.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

Says the person who wants an echo-chamber

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

as long as they're small and not annoying, it's better to keep them, so ppl can influence them

[-] emmy67@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

This is the logic that keeps them and their hateful ideas in the community.

Let them go live in their own bubble.

Locking them out of the broader community is the right choice

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

I haven't seen any evidence of their users consistently violating rules of other instances, I've only seen intolerant communities on their instance. That should not be grounds for defederation, we should only defederate if their instance refuses to deal with reported abuse from their users.

So I'll vote no on this. While I very much disagree politically w/ that instance, I don't think that's enough to defederate.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

The only interactions I've had with them was a user trolling.

If you have evidence, post it. If we have any mods who have experience working w/ their admins, we should have that evidence as well.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

meh, I'm not going to convince you. Just vote no. Besides:

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

As a general rule, I am against defederation unless the instance is going to cause liability or technical problems (bot spamming, illegal content, etc.)

This instance in particular is closer to banning a user that is self hosting. It is closed, requires account approval, and thusly defederation will not catch any unknowing users in a dragnet.

So I think defederation is a reasonable exception for this instance, especially given the community vote in progress.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

are you being affected by them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] poke@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I would like the option to vote to defer to the moderators. Reason being while I think it is valid to keep their community exposed to outside, less supportive, takes on their ideology, I also understand that the community has potential to be a particularly toxic and hostile one, so I understand if our moderators (who I am very appreciative of) don't want to take on the task of keeping them in check on this community.

Also, those of you upvoting and downvoting votes are wild.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

The Agora

1743 readers
26 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS