341

The right loves throwing around the word "insane" when they talk about the Left.

Uh-huh.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

RFK Jr is despicable, but Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals from microplastics are ABSOLUTELY wreaking havoc on human reproductive physiology. The evidence is overwhelming and this TechDirt article is frankly embarrassing.

[-] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 43 points 1 month ago

I wish he'd start pushing for a reduction in plastic and petrol chemicals...lol

[-] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Technically the proposed bans on food colorings are an attempt at reducing petrochemical consumption, as they are derived from fossil fuels

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Who is downvoting this fact?

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Well, that article isn't the best either, as it mentions phytoestrogens as a factor, which we have no conclusive evidence for.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

Great, then let's see the evidence. Where are the peer-reviewed statistical studies that show a causal link? Where's the lab work that shows part of a causal chain? Without those, it's not science, it's just more "many people believe" bullshit.

[-] EtherTide@aussie.zone 14 points 1 month ago

Part of the reason there's not more evidence and it's hard to prove a causal link is because it's next to impossible to find enough participants for a control group because of how prevalent microplastics have become in our food and subsequently our bodies. You can't exactly run peer review observational, experimental and double blind studies on only one half (more like one third, as a causal study would need to induce change from a->b) of the required test groups. t- and p-tests also are much less valuable if the sample size is too small.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

You also can't exactly get ethical approval to put microplastics into people for the purposes of scientific experimentation. Or at least, it would be very difficult. More so when current evidence shows that it does have actively harmful effects.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, except you don't have to do that to draw meaningful conclusions.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

This. You'd need a bunch of pre-industrial people as your Control Group.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That's right. Science is hard.

And if you can't find a control group with zero levels, you can still compare populations according to the different levels of microplastics they have.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals from microplastics are ABSOLUTELY wreaking havoc on human reproductive physiology

oh, shut up.

BPA was originally developed as one of a series of chemicals by researchers trying to develop synthetic estrogens in the 60s, but they dropped it because it did not have any actual activity in humans.

Decades later, some truly shitty research at ONE lab in Missouri claimed hormonal effects in mice at levels simply not possible in humans. None of it was reproducible. Governments worldwide then wasted millions in over 800 studies that showed BPA was safe. Press ignored all these studies, because fear gets more clicks.

Good summary article here:

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health-news/majestically-scientific-study-casts-doubt-risks-associated-bisphenol

“Fundamental, repetitive work on bisphenol A has sucked in hundreds of millions of dollars and it looks increasingly like an investment with nil return. All it has done is to show that there is a huge price to pay when initial studies are adhered to as being correct when the second phase of scientific peer review, namely, the inability of other laboratories to repeat the initial studies says otherwise.” He references a study in the journal Toxicological Sciences that showed complete absence of effect of a rage of bisphenol A exposures on reproductive development, function and behavior in female rats. The results of this study are robust and unequivocal and counter previous more circumspect studies that spawned the BPA fear. The press, however, didn’t pick up this story.

Endocrine disruption is real, but it tracks with morbid obesity in teens.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Pthalates are more than just bpa and are very bio available and active. There is like a metric fuck ton of research about it.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

They're grasping at straws to scapegoat assorted "woke" shit for low birth rates because it couldn't possibly be late-stage capitalism causing people not to want to have kids.

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Two things can be true at the same time. Late-stage capitalism is responsible for financially discouraging parents from having children, and fertility rates are declining due to a decline in reproductive health.

Fertility rates are being affected by food additives and pollutants, and RFK Jr. Is a complete nutjob who pulls statistics out of his herniated ass.

Don't fall for the black and white rhetoric Republicans are trying to pull. They are trying to get leftists to say 'these statistics are ridiculous and therefore microplastics and environmental damages by corporations are not a relevant issue.'

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

and boys are not getting boobs because of plastic, it's because they are fat.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It looks like there's a lot of causes, but yeah obesity is a big one for post pubescent pre geriatric gynecomastia. Apparently most boys get temporary gynecomastia mid puberty though.

Like I'm all for trying to deal with the endocrine issues the youth are currently facing. It's just that I get the strong feeling they're going to be far more interested in things like banning birth control and estrogen replacement than things like estrogen destructive enzymes in wastewater treatment (which would also stop us from changing frogs' sexes too much) or reducing dairy consumption. It's clear Kennedy doesn't care about science when it goes against his gut instinct.

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

That and the racism about white birth rates.

[-] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

What the actual fuck is this timeline?

[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

What a great reminder that the current administration is full of pedophiles covering for other pedophiles.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

My sperm count is one, it's a very big sperm

[-] one_step_behind@quokk.au 6 points 1 month ago
[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

No thank you the ocean!

[-] Zier@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

RFK is the person you warn your children about. KEEP YOUR KIDS AWAY FROM THIS CREEP!

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

RFKJ is a fucking crackpot and nothing he says should be taken as having any scientific basis.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s pedophile pseudo science so that they can justify raping little girls to “raise birth rates”.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

If there is one group of people on this planet that is worried about what is in between your legs, it’s the republicans. It’s beyond weird at this point. When they aren’t protecting pedophiles, they are dreaming about your sexual organs.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Jokes on them, that's my kink!

[-] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Laying the groundwork for their pedo shit.

The birth rate is falling. It can only mean one thing! Teen sperm is failing! But fear not! My merry band of ~~pedophiles~~ patriots is here to impregnate your teens! Mandated by our glorious leader, king of the pedophiles!

[-] Cargon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

RFK Jr probably has the best bleach milkshake recipes.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Meowie_Gamer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

me on my way to get my balls chopped off so he can't see my sperm count uwu

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
341 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18905 readers
2183 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS