68
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by capuccino@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world

I was into a rabbit hole questioning me about God's existence, debating myself and looking for different opinions of different people, when, sadly, I found that the bible is copyrighted.

You can find the licenses nearly at the bottom. https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/es/Hebreos%2011%3A6

It's was sad, because it make me stop questioning me about the existence of god, everything started because I said to me "if god exists, then faith is useless, we need the inexistence of god to have faith", but that, makes me feel less faith

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

When you are looking for opinions: There are no gods. The fact that gods don't exist, is no reason to have faith. You have faith in things you believe in them, even if you cannot prove their existence. If you don't think, gods exist, you are an atheist like me. Welcome to the club. It is nice here.

As others pointed out, the texts that landed in todays bible variants are hundrets to thousands of years old. Nobody can claim a copyright for that stuff. Just for recent translations.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 64 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A particular Bible translation made in something like the last hundred years might be copyrighted. Outside of that, it's public domain.

It's also possible for a newer translation to be put into the public domain by the translator.

[-] DoGeeseSeeGod 16 points 4 days ago

Is there anything to prevent me from calling something a translation of the bible, but really it's just the story of how I think my dog sees me mixed with the plot of fight club?

[-] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No. Well, not in the US. Some country somewhere probably has blasphemy law. Not unless you get really confusingly-similar to some trademarked Bible translation, enough that there was risk of confusion. And that'd be trademark law, not copyright.

EDIT: Well, okay. Maybe truth-in-advertising law. Like, if you actively misled buyers to the point that they thought that they were getting something totally different.

[-] m4xie@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

If you're selling it for money and it's not clear how inaccurate of a translation it is, that could be fraud.

[-] capuccino@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I see. I need some time to digest the idea

[-] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

The number of assholes falsely claiming copyright on public-domain stuff is too damn high!

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

If any, the copyright applies to a translation, not the text as such. You can always take either an older version of a translation or take the original text and work with those.

[-] hildegarde 19 points 4 days ago

Copyrights don't last perpetually, and the bible is old enough to be public domain. Newer translations and editions can be under copyright but the underlying work is public domain.

Copyright purportedly exists to promote the sciences and useful arts. Historical scholarship, and the research into old manuscripts in making a new edition of any old work does have value, and does entitle you to a copyright. However, scholarly editions generally have a shorter term than original works.

The bible is public domain, but there are copyrighted editions. The same can be said for most historical works of note. There are copyrighted editions of Beethoven's symphonies, Shakespeare's plays, and Arthur Conan Doyle's books, despite the original works being public domain.

I don't think copyrights are evidence for or against the existence of any god, or the validity of any religion. The fact that there are copyrighted editions means there is interest in studying the texts, which is true for every extant religion.

[-] Web_Rand@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 4 days ago

KJV is public domain. And you won't get in trouble for pirating the NIV.

edit: on second thought, consider using a vpn when pirating anything.

[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Copyright doesn’t make faith useless or disprove God. Textual criticism, archaeology, and science do that far more thoroughly.

P.S. Bibles are copyrighted simply because publishers want to protect their editions. A lot of time and effort goes into it. Source texts and older translations aren't copyright and are freely available from a number of sources.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 9 points 4 days ago

Forget about God for a while, and drink a beer in the shower. You'll feel better.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Now that's a religion I can follow, can you tell me more??

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 4 days ago

Wikipedia provides the history. A nice cold beer in a warm shower can be very refreshing! (Wine and a bubble bath is also acceptable, but who has the time, you know?)

[-] duhlieluh@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

there are reasons for it, and there are versions of the bible in public domain. you can decide if those reasons are right for yourself example.

[-] SnotFlickerman 6 points 4 days ago

Look into the Gideons. I don't agree with all their philosophy obviously, but they're like the Open Source/Open Knowledge group of the Christian faith.

One of their main things is that they think since the Bible is the word of God, and people deserve to be saved, that it's their job to ensure everyone gets a fair shake at access to a Bible without having to pay for it. You used to always be able to find a Bible in a hotel thanks to them, and they're often at public gatherings handing out copies as well.

I'm not religious, and I don't agree with much of what they believe, but I do think that is an appropriate way to view the situation, that it should be freely available to all instead of essentially locked behind a paywall.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It sounds like they don't have their own translation.

https://www.quora.com/Which-translation-of-the-Bible-does-the-Gideons-International-distribute

Which translation of the Bible does the Gideons International distribute?

Depending on the language, the most currently accepted translation in the language of the print. As a Gideon since 1994, I have distributed thousands of free New Testament versions and placed hundreds of hotel Bibles. Until recently, the New King James Bible (NKJV) was the most common version in English. It is acceptable to 55% of English speakers, the next highest is the NIV with 19%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_King_James_Version

Copyright: The Holy Bible, New King James Version® Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson.

Gideons International, an organization that places Bibles in hotels and hospitals, at one stage used the NKJV translation along with the KJV, offering the KJV as the default translation and offering the NKJV when an organization asked for a Bible in newer English to be used. After HarperCollins' acquisition of Thomas Nelson, however, the Gideons have chosen to start using the English Standard Version (ESV) instead of the NKJV.[10][11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Standard_Version

Copyright: The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

[-] SnotFlickerman 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah my point was less about the copyright aspect and more about the free distribution aspect. It's definitely sad that they don't have their own free-and-open-for-all version but oh well.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

Pretty sure the copyright on the KJV, which is obviously the best version, has expired by now.

[-] e0qdk@reddthat.com 13 points 4 days ago

Indeed -- it is out of copyright. KJV is available for free here: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10 (among other places)

I've read it cover-to-cover (excepting some parts like the census results in Numbers that I skimmed) despite not being a Christian. It is a rather challenging read.

[-] Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I was on a quest to do this but I lost interest after reaching Jeremiah. Ecclesiastes surprised me though - that one was interesting.

Which was your favorite, if I may ask?

[-] e0qdk@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

Ecclesiastes surprised me though - that one was interesting.

Same. That's one of a few parts I'm planning to go back and re-read eventually. I don't know if I have a favorite part, but that definitely grabbed my attention.

In general, I'd say the parts worth my time, in addition to Ecclesiastes, were the first 5 books of the Old Testament (Torah equivalent), some of the histories, and the Gospels. I didn't really care for the seemingly endless letters of Paul et al, the Psalms, Proverbs, or the prophets generally. It's possibly I didn't have the right perspective/context to appreciate them. I did find the fact that there are words -- like "selah" -- which we don't actually know the meaning of to be interesting though, and, of course, seeing names and the sources for references I've encountered in other media was also interesting. (e.g. the title "Malachi" of the last book of the Old Testament jumped out at me because of Futurama even though the book itself didn't leave a strong impression when I read it.)

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

KJV, which is obviously the best version

Is this a joke or are you serious? What's "best" in a person's view depends on their values, (like the "best" food depends on what flavours a person likes, and their nutritional needs)

What values would a person need to have to consider the KJV the best? I don't think it's the easiest to read, nor the easiest to understand, nor the most accurate. I don't think it's the oldest English translation either and it's also biased. Is it the most poetic, maybe?

[-] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Is this a joke or are you serious?

Both. I realize it's not for everyone, but I like it the best. When I got into it, what I was looking for in a religious text was not that it be "the easiest" but I didn't want to learn Latin or Hebrew either.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned

25418 readers
231 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS