441
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With Linux, I can change just about everything. If I want a real-time kernel, I can switch. If I want a different desktop environment, change. If I want more control from my keyboard, Linux has my back.

As much as I agree with the sentiment of the article, this is a terrible reason and more likely to scare people away from Linux rather than get them to install it.

If you know what a "real-time kernel" is, you're probably already using Linux and you are a highly technically literate user. Any "normal person" user is going to look at that and think "Oh, I guess I need to understand technobabble in order to use Linux". Normal users care about easy, preset defaults, not customization.

Once again, Linux adoption is kneecapped by its own users, who forget what normal people really care about.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

The computer savvy folks don’t need to be reminded. The non savvy folks who don’t have time to learn Linux are stuck with windows/apple.

[-] varnia 5 points 4 days ago

Many tech-savvy people just haven’t made the switch to Linux - often out of convenience rather than capability. Focusing on broader adoption first could make it easier to introduce Linux to less technical users later.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mihies@programming.dev 39 points 6 days ago

Security: Linux doesn't need antivirus, just don't install infected software. Riiiight? Sorry, but this is silly.

[-] addie@feddit.uk 50 points 6 days ago

Centrally managed repositories help a lot, here. Linux users tend not to download random software off of sketchy websites; it's all installed and kept up to date via the package manager.

Yes, Linux malware and viruses exist, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise. The usual reason for installing Linux virus scanners is because you're hosting a file/email server, and you want to keep infected files away from Windows users, tho.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Linux users tend not to download random software off of sketchy websites;

Search for "sudo curl ...... | sh" and let me know how many hits you get.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Mihies@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago

Even package managers are vulnerable to many security problems - can they guarantee that apps are not infected either directly or indirectly (through a library)? There is also flathub. Windows have also an option to verify apps through certificates which isn't the case with Linux AFAIK. If you want to stay safe on Windows to some degree you can, but the real problem IMO is that Windows is hugely more used and run by less technical persons. 🤷‍♂️

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

This isn't true

Linux package managers typically use GPG which is a much better solution. It is simpler and doesn't have the unnecessary complexity of certificates.

What security problems do you think package managers are vulnerable to? If the upstream repo is compromised all bets are off regardless of the system.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sunshine@piefed.social 44 points 6 days ago

It’s easier than you think to try out on dual boot. You can also run your windows apps through a virtual machine!

[-] Jaeger86@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Is dual boot a good way to ease yourself in? I literally just made a new nvme partition to try a dual boot

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Don't do it on a machine that holds valuable data or one that you need the machine to stay functional for work. I repeatedly fucked up my installation trying to get dual boot setup initially. Bootloader are easy to mess up. Even on a working installation, a Windows update would sometimes break the dual boot.

Its not difficult to set up a virtual machine inside your Linux installation. That way you don't have to reboot and lose your other workflow to access your windows apps.

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 27 points 6 days ago

If you can, dual boot by having each OS on a separate physical drive.

[-] Jaeger86@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This is what I was planning, I added a small nvme drive to my desktop to put Linux on

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Real-time Kernel?

Like my popcorn?

Desktop environment

Jimmy I work in an office. What are you talking about?

  • Your average Windows user... Probably.
[-] refalo@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

5 reasons you should not ditch Windows:

  • Your hardware is incompatible or you do not want to fiddle with settings or command lines

  • Your applications/games only work well on native Windows (and not wine)

  • You need serious group policy support or other device/software lockdown methods

  • Your company policy requires it

  • Makes helping Windows users harder if you cannot walk them through the same things they are doing

Of course if any of these apply you can always dual-boot or use a VM. I'm not saying you shouldn't use Linux at all.

[-] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

you do not want to fiddle with settings or command lines

Kinda the reverse for me

I need to fiddle with Massgrave and various debloat scripts to run win

Your applications/games only work well on native Windows

Windows for docker, winboat, etc

serious group policy support or other device/software lockdown methods

I would argue sudo and normal file permissions do the same

Makes helping Windows users harder

???

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] matelt@feddit.uk 23 points 6 days ago

The first paragraph alone filled me with so much emotion because my very first computer was a Pentium 75 too! If I hadn't switched over to Linux earlier this year I would do it again in a heartbeat 💓 best decision I've ever taken!

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago

I've said this many times here, but I was a Windows fanboy for close to 30 years. I hate that Windows got so bad, but I'm happy that I switched. Linux is great.

[-] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 21 points 6 days ago

The only thing holding me back at this point is a thin thread called my favorite game only supports and requires anti-cheat on Windows. :(

And money but hopefully that'll solve itself soon.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] bobaworld@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

One of the biggest things keeping me from jumping into Linux as my primary OS is because of nvidia's performance issues, particularly with DX12 games on Linux. I'd be taking like a 10%-30% performance hit. I know the games will "run" but I want them to run well, that's why I spend so much money on my GPU.

[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The first one (MS account) is so weird to me...

I mean, I get it, people are just allergic to "anything MS", but it's just silly.

Set up a "burner" MS account. Use it to set up the OS, get your BitLocker recovery key and the OS license backed up automatically for easy use. Create your regular local account, switch, remove admin rights from the MS account, never use it again.

Job done, problem solved.

The third one (better performance) is disingenuous. Better performance... where? On what hardware? Nvidia drivers are notorious for causing issues. Many games, even on Proton, run like crap or just... don't run.

The last one, security, is also a bad reason. Linux is not inherently more secure than Windows, it's just less attacked due to a lower desktop market share. What Linux does have, however, is that it's massively easier to break by a clueless user, especially when following online advice when something isn't working - and that's going to be a common occurrence, especially with freshly-switched newbies. Windows will prevent noobs from breaking or exposing a lot of stuff.

The urban legend that Linux is more secure than Windows needs to die.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm always amused at the hoops that some Windows users will jump through in a vain attempt to sidestep Microsoft's telemetry and surveillance—rather than just using an OS that respects your privacy to begin with. It's gotta be Stockholm syndrome or something.

EDIT: https://tessa.transpri.de/i/ngcpy.gif

[-] bobaworld@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It's the nvidia performance issues that keep me on Windows. I'd love to use an operating system that values and respects my privacy. But I'm not willing to take a large gaming performance hit to do it. That day this gets fixed I am dropping Windows and never looking back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Linux is more secure than Windows

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Linux doesn't really have better security. It is actually worse from a purely security perspective.

The key difference is privacy and freedom. A high security prison might be secure but you probably don't want to be there.

[-] anonymous111@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago
[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not OP but - Windows is being bombarded by malware every second of every day. Linux, with its 6% of desktop user market share - not so much. This kinda' guarantees Windows has a pretty good resilience (these days).

On top of that - in Linux you can change/break anything, which means bad actors could have you run malware by posting "helpful" comments on help threads. You know, "just run this .sh with sudo".

Then you have situations like Arch has been going through - DDOS attacks on official repos and malware injected into a couple of packages in AUR. Sure, it got caught - but how many users installed the malware? How many other packages are under less scrutiny and are still serving malware in AUR?

And, I'm certain, someone out there is reading this and preparing to write a hot take on how "AUR is what it is, you're not supposed to blindly install stuff from it" - but that's exactly the problem. Because 99% of users have no clue what they're doing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago

1 reason:

Microsoft

[-] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

Any Tipps on how to do that in a business environment? Preferably from people who are actually using Linux in a professional environment? I'm using Linux at home for more than a decade now, and I don't miss Windows at all, but transforming a smallish company to use Linux in a way that is remotely as comfortable as the Windows stuff seems impossible for now. I need to find solutions that don't make it harder for our staff to get their work done, because they are busy enough with actual work.

Simply replacing MS Office with LibreOffice and Nextcloud for example does not cut it. The tight integration of MS Teams, Office and Cloud functionality is seen as a huge benefit there and I can't just take that away from them unless I find a combination of tools that work in a similar fashion. Using Google products instead is obviously not a viable alternative. Every cloud based solution I have found so far is underwhelming at best and lacks a good integration.

Serious answers appreciated.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Sunshine@piefed.social 12 points 6 days ago

Zorin OS is much more straight forward than Windows 11.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
441 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

9880 readers
398 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS