603
Free energy mod! (startrek.website)
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Seems like satire to me. Pretty funny too.

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

The Law of LinkedIn:

If you think it's satire, it's probably actually just a really stupid individual.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

This guy is only telling us part of the truth. You actually need three batteries. The third battery is hooked up to a solar and wind generator. Only then can you achieve true energy independence.

[-] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Techbros rediscovering old principles, a tale as old as....well, since the tech industry.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

don't forget to add quantum tunneling between the batteries for extra efficiency

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nerobro@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

So you're on your ebike, going 15mph. Using 140w or so. You're spending 15-20w on the drivetrain, and the remainder is entirely aerodynamic drag. You're putting 120-125w into making wind move. You're also losing 5-10 watts to the drive electronics and dashboard. So your total power use is 150w.

If you're going to recharge a battery. In the same time it takes to ride, you need to get at least 150w of power into another battery. Sadly, batteries don't actually "just cleanly charge" there are some losses, but since we're going to take an hour to charge it, lets call it 5%. So to fill up that battery we need 157watts of input power.

Your bike, moving at a steady speed, is absorbing 150w of power. If we want another 155w of power, where is that going to come from? If we take it from.. say.. the front wheel, we are now absorbing another 155w of power. So to maintain the same speed, we now need to push the bike along with 305w of power. And.. now we need a bike that makes 305w of power, to go the same speed we were going with 150w. .... And we're only generating 155w.

There is no free lunch. If you're doing work, you need to get that power from somewhere.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

So like regenerative breaking for e-bikes? Except that such a thing already exists.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago

Apparently regenerative breaking efficiency in bikes is rather limited (small motors / generators, high friction). It still increases the range a fair bit (enough to be a better investment than bigger batteries), but efficiency is still not as high in bikes as in bigger vehicles which can drive more kinetic energy into bigger generators with better individual wheel control

Some paper says ~25% extra range in bikes at the high end vs ~50% energy savings in Japanese trains. Different units for those numbers, but you can infer that trains has much more efficient regenerative breaking because that number indicate a doubled range for the same amount of energy used.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] plyth@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Does he have a fundme or patreon page? I think it's worth supporting his research if it can be applied to cars and trains one day.

If somebody is an airplane engineer, is it possible to do something like that with planes? It would be great if planes could become environmentally friendly with such technologies.

[-] a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hello, I am the owner of a large investment fund and I am willing to offer 1 billion dollars to develop this young man’s technology

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Unironically, I would enjoy a bike that I could pedal at a constant speed, charging the battery all the while. Give me a display that indicates my pedaling speed so that I can tailor my exercise and you’ve created a moving stationary bike. I hate having to stop at lights and whatnot, so a rotation-based stabilizer would be nice at speeds below 10 km/h as I pedal the equivalent of 30.

Really, it’s just unfortunate that the engineering doesn't work out for momentum->chemical energy unless you’re biking at a professional level and willing to cruise slowly or charging the battery at home. Bleh

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ethalis@jlai.lu 9 points 1 week ago

At this point just cut the middle man and have battery 1 directly charge battery 2, then reverse it when it's done. Same results with way less hassle

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

You could harvest energy from going down hills and braking, but that’s probably not work the weight.

load more comments (3 replies)

Unrelated, but the pedaling cadence people have on ebikes bothers me. I'm always seeing folks in a high gear slowly pedaling. I'm like dude you're sacrificing watts! Pedal faster on a lower gear, you'll use the same energy but go faster.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] gratux 8 points 1 week ago

I am not well versed in modern electric bikes. Do they offer regenerative braking yet?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
603 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5630 readers
1 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS