886

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has spoken out after video emerged appearing to show House Republican Lauren Boebert engaging in what the New York congresswoman described as "sexually lewd acts" in a Colorado theater on September 10.

Boebert and a male companion were thrown out of the Buell Theatre in Denver after repeatedly vaping, using a cell phone and "causing a disturbance" during a performance of musical Beetlejuice.

Surveillance footage from inside the theater appeared to show Boebert's male accomplice groping her breasts, and then being groped in turn by the Republican firebrand. In a statement, Boebert apologized for her behavior, which she claimed "fell short of my values," but made no reference to the alleged sexual acts.

Ocasio-Cortez responded to the controversy in a one-minute video posted to her 323,000 TikTok followers on Thursday, in response to a viewer's question.

She commented: "All I gotta say is I can't go out to lunch in Florida in my free time, not doing anything, just eating outside and it's wall-to-wall Fox News coverage and then you have a member of Congress engaging is sexually lewd acts in a public theater and they got nothing to say.”

"I danced to Phoenix once in college and it was like all over the place. But putting on a whole show of their own at Beetlejuice and there's nothing? I'm just saying be consistent. That's all I'm asking for. Equal treatment. I don't expect it, but come on."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 193 points 1 year ago

Living has gotta be tough when you know Ben Shapiro is updating your Wikifeet entry daily. Keep up the good work AOC. One day Ben will be gone and you'll be able to wear strappy shoes and sandals in peace once again.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Wikifeet is...real? Yup, we don't deserve the internet. Or earth.

Also, why are the feet fetishists some of the creepiest? I don't like kink shaming but why are they so weird?

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude, how long have you been online if wikifeet is what you think puts us over the edge of deserving internet?

You could honesty find at least 300 more taboo fetishes in under an hour without even getting into the dark web.

[-] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The tabooness of the fetish isn't what he's talking about but rather the personality of the person with the fetish.

[-] SkyeStarfall 22 points 1 year ago

It's one thing to have weird kinks, it's another to be including non-consenting strangers into it

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

My theory is that some of the men who really enjoy sucking girls' big toe are sublimating their desire to show oral affection to an entirely kind of blunt roughly thumb-thickness object.

I am talking, of course, about cigars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

If it is as real as you suggest, they really missed an opportunity to call it "Wikifeetia"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 181 points 1 year ago

I love her, downvote me if you must.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 84 points 1 year ago

Say what you will about pronouns, sometimes they aren't clear.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait, what? I've just reread my comment like 50 times trying to figure out what you mean.

[-] bobzilla@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

"Her" could refer to AOC or Boebert. It is technically unclear.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

lotta people are going to be real mad about their upvotes when op follows up with "...and that's why Lauren Boebert is great" or whatever.

[-] macaro 33 points 1 year ago

Are you referring to Boobert or AOC?

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

AOC, WTF? Who in their right mind? Like I might hate fuck Booberry, but she's horrible.

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago

I remember how much pearl-clutching there was over AOC. Dancing. In college. Oh, the horror! Imagine it! Dancing! All of a sudden every con became a town elder with a stick wedged in their posterior in the movie Footloose.

(By the way - I love to use those gifs of her dancing when replying to cons when the discussion is AOC.)

And now that Qbert is caught in a grope session, with children present, the cons seem to be mum. Weird.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

AOC dancing in college, Vivek Ramaswamy rapping to Eminem like 2 weeks ago.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

Do they really have to say alleged sex acts? I mean, there's video. Are they suggesting that maybe the groping and fondling wasn't sexual in nature?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

You’re right, the uh “activity” was definitely getting her boobs groped and flashed about- and giving a handy in return (both of which looked incredibly uncomfortable, just saying.)

That said, what the video shows is a crime, and there’s fairly strict ways they can write about potential criminals which more or less mandate tacking on qualifiers- like “allegedly”, at least until they can tack on the “convicted” qualifier.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Thats a good point. She already apologized for getting caught as well. I think at this point its "verified exhibitionist sex acts"

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe she was vigorously trying to get a stain ~~in~~ off his pants...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe she lost a popcorn down in her titties and he was helping get it out. And to thank him she... gave him an OTPHJ? I got nothin'.

[-] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

gave him an OTPHJ? I got nothin'.

The kids are now referring to that as a Boebert.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 year ago

Obviously she's completely correct. But she should realize at this point that it's a waste of time to ever expect conservatives to be consistent. It's not in their nature.

[-] JohnnyEnzyme@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago

Right, but that's also where it's up to us to help call it out.

AOC's fighting exactly our fight, and the minute we get complacent, I say that's where we suck.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Right. Use these kind of hypocritical acts as ammunition with conservative supporters. They'll fight you. They'll get angry and defensive. They'll say it's not the same.

Don't let them get away with it. It is the same. Just keep saying that. Call them delusional. Call them out of touch.

Embarras the fuck out of them. They might not change their minds, but they will shut the fuck up and maybe even have second thoughts when voting.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago

She literally said “I don’t expect it.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 year ago

The article really is just about how she responded to a thing. Not even mentioning in title if she did it in a noteworthy way or anything, just that she responded. Amazing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Omgarm@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

God wants you to feel up people in public places, clearly.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 16 points 1 year ago

That's why he gave us 10 fingers and only two legs (obviously dancing is less important).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Infinity187@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Didn't those weirdos also go on about AOC's boyfriends feet at some point? The right wing media and the GQP have absolutely no substance. Their whole existence is a huge drain on our society.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] drekly@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I wish we had an AOC in the UK

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I wish we had NHS in the U.S.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish becoming a billionaire made your head pop like a party balloon releasing glitter and little "Winner!" paper notes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

The lady has a point.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
886 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
1943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS