220
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Yea ... Epstein files when?

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's ironic

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago
[-] Hoticeberg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

What about them Epstein Files?

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Every accusation is a confession.

[-] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hail Satan. Satan promotes individual liberty and free thought, not being a slave to Yahweh. Perhaps it's time for the DNC to stop being afraid of being labeled communists, satanists, etc. and embrace it. Capitalism and Christianity are why this country is in the mess it's in now.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

The grim reaper needs to visit Trump soon and throw him into the void.

[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

The living embodiment of the seven deadly sins can shut his stupid pie hole.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

It gets more extreme every time they open their mouths.

It goes from Dems just being shitty leaders a year ago and calling them juvenile names like “Sleepy Joe” to now, where we have to be in an alliance with Satan in order to keep ratcheting up the extremes.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 5 hours ago

Yes, he's DEDINITELY FUCKING SATAN

[-] AlecSadler 78 points 1 day ago
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 44 points 1 day ago

The projection is strongest when the need for distraction is highest.

[-] miguel@fedia.io 51 points 1 day ago

Again, I'm just asking for the dems to be half as metal as the gop paints them to be.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

anything besides the usual would be nice

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago

We have first hand evidence that Trump is involved in an intimate relationship with Satan.

[-] tfm@piefed.europe.pub 28 points 1 day ago

He is definitely fucking Satan

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Likely the other way around

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Chances are that Trump is incapable of fucking anyone or anything. I think that's one source of his increasing rage.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Strong talk from someone who fits all the criteria for an antichrist. Dear Mr. President, how's your pedo spiritual advisor doing? Called him yet? Drafting a pardon for your fellow child molester?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

He would know, he got satan pregnant.

[-] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network 10 points 21 hours ago

I absolutely love how South Park handled this.

Whoever suggested they should drop Garrisontrump and pivot to the real thing is a genius.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

This is gonna require a strongly worded letter in response. Nothing less, nothing more.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Oh I think we’re talking levels of “very concerned” here.

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago

Epstein's Law: every accusation from a Conservative [of being guilty of a thing] is a confession [of being guilty of the thing]

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago
[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 day ago

Every accusation a confession

Making the opposition sound more and more awesome. Can we get more of those fictitious people in the caucus? Because I feel like Chuck Schumer could use an angry Satanic replacement who performs blood rituals on the floor of the Senate to make a point.

[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

It's always projection, lol…

[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[-] Kurious84@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago

Projection at its best

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

He's doing the people's work with grace and humility. Just like Jesus would have done.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
220 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25910 readers
2371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS