659
IT'S A TRAP (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nairui@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

fossilesque you’re one of my fav posters

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

I don't think we want a world where there are any sort of infinity of people, and I don't think a tram is the solution to revert a world from having its infinities to having a finite number

I also see practicality problems in tying even a small infinity of people to railway tracks, as that requires yet another infinity of people to hold people down, and another infinity of people people to do the tying (as well as the infinities of people to do the tying and holding on the other track) and all of those people will have to be fed and watered with infinite amounts of food and water (some infinities of people for infinite time), the infinities of people tying people down would need some education, implying infinite teachers

It's a logistic nightmare

[-] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

I thought that the correct answer to these was making a loop on the right, merging the lines.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Unfortunately it's hard to join the tag end of one infinity to the tag end of another infinity to allow traversing both completely

I don't really think it's even sensible to talk about the tag end of an infinity. The bitten/bitter end is at 1, the tag end at infinity in this mental model. I feel that is the correct way to use rope terms for imagined embodied infinities as the small end is clearly bitten to (tied to) zero while the other end is free

[-] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 2 points 17 hours ago

No, we need a second trolley.

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Is there a way to take both routes?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Hit the hand brake and drift that sucker.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 20 hours ago
[-] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Running in the 90s intensifies

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

with my knack for drifting i'll miss both and hit something else entirely even within this imaginary scenario

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

You dont have to since the set of all positive integers belongs to the set of all real numbers, you actually hit both tracks by just taking the lower track.

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

never doubt my ability to mess up the unmessable. i just might stumble into disabling clipping and end up falling forever.

[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Top case is not the smallest infinite; going for prime number would save a lot of time for a lot of people before they die

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 19 hours ago

The set of all primes is the same size infinity as the set of all positive integers because you could create a way to map one to the other aka you can count to the nth prime. Reals are different in that there are an infinite number of real between any two reals which means there's no possible way to map them.

[-] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 9 points 19 hours ago

The set of primes and the set of integers have the same size, you can map a prime to every integer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ssfckdt 20 points 1 day ago

The first one, because people will die at a slower rate.

The second one, because the density will cause the trolley to slow down sooner, versus the first one where it will be able to pick up speed again between each person. Also, more time to save people down the rail with my handy rope cutting knife.

[-] aeternum 19 points 1 day ago

I think it was numberphile, or maybe vsauce, who did a video on infinities. It was really interesting. I learnt a lot, then forgot it all.

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, I remember my eyes glazing over as things got too complicated to fit through my thick skull

[-] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago

First, I start moving people to hotel rooms...

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

This hypothetical post is a thought crime!

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Good to know there are roughly 6 real numbers for every integer

[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I mean, the bottom. The trolley simply would stop, get gunked up by all the guts and the sheer amount of bodies so close together. Checkmate tolley.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the top one you will never actually kill an infinite number of people, just approach it linearly. The bottom one will kill an infinite amount of people in finite time.

Edit: assuming constant speed of the train.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

I'm going bottom.

NOT LIKE THAT. Not like sexually. I just mean I want to kill all the people on the bottom with my train.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] nathanjent@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

An infinite amount of people on the track implies that the track is infinitely long. If that is not the case and the track is a normal length then the sudden addition of all that bio-mass in a finite space will cause a gravitational collapse. But will the collapse start on the first track or the second? Either way I hope you saved your game because you might lose your progress.

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

The mass of dead bodies is what replenishes the new living ones on the finite track.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The infamious theory of infinitly-expanding train track in porportion with train-travelled distence sequared by prof. buttnugget

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago
[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 57 points 1 day ago

Bottom.

Killing one person for every real number implies there’s a way to count all real numbers one by one. This is a contradiction, because real numbers are uncountable. By principle of explosion, I’m Superman, which means I can stop the train by my super powers. QED

[-] nekbardrun@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Either that or the humans are so "infinitely packed" that they're probably already dead squashed into each other.

Now, if you put infinite people in a chamber, and then compress the chamber and then put an infinite amount of compressed chambers inside a chamber.... Will we have Real People?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 21 hours ago

Multilane drifting!

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Actually... this means there are infinite people so:

Let X be the number of people killed = (-infinity)

As infity is defined :

infinity + X = infinity

infinity + (-infinity) =

infinity - infinity = infinty

So no people would have died black guy pointing at his head meme

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

You've misunderstood "some infinities are bigger than others." Both of these infinities are the same size. You can show this since each person on the bottom track can be assigned a person from the top track at 1 to 1 ratio. An example of infinities that are different sizes are all whole numbers and all decimal numbers. You cannot assign a whole number to every decimal number.

Matt parker does a good video on this. I can't remember the exact title but if you search "is infinite $20 notes worth more than infinite $1 notes" you should find it.

[-] sniggleboots@europe.pub 6 points 1 day ago

There are more reals than naturals, they do not match up 1 to 1, for exactly the reason you mentioned. Maybe you misread the meme?

load more comments (12 replies)

The bottom rail represents the real numbers, which are "every decimal number".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
659 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16945 readers
1702 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS