273
submitted 1 year ago by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 92 points 1 year ago

Do they want to lose access to… everything on the internet? Because this is how you lose access to everything.

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 53 points 1 year ago

Haha yes definitely something to follow. I'm looking forward to lists of companies that left UK because of this (as announced) and lists of companies that stay and thus prove that their end-to-end encryption isn't a real one

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

I keep forgetting that the UK left the European Union. When I originally read that title I was like how the fuck could that happen? Oh Brexit. That is going to set them back decades.

[-] Ihnivid@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't you worry, EU votes on killing end-to-end encryption in private messaging next week.

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Digital Brexit

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

" Safety Bill " the fucking irony of it Tories making sure we're the biggest clown show in the world. Well time to shutdown all those https end points and spool up jhonlewi5.co.uk to my offshore account.

"If companies do not comply, media regulator Ofcom will be able to issue fines of up to 18 million pounds ($22.3 million) or 10% of their annual global turnover." Yet thier mates can quite happly steal tax money under PPE contracts and pump literal shit into our waterways.

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

Well, they already left the EU, now they want to leave the internet, too.

[-] El_Dorado@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Well all you can say is bye bye and good luck

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 22 points 1 year ago

So did Signal and others actually leave the UK market or did they fold like a wet paper napkin like we all knew they would?

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

By the looks of it e2ee isn't actually banned, and if e.g. Signal says "we can't technically scan people's messages" then they're given a pass... maybe. The Reuters article reads like the UK gvmt are going to be going after more Facebook-like media first, rather than encrypted private messages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

We made it safe by making it so nobody can be safe. What are you people mot understanding?!

/s

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Uh it’s not impossible, just illegal.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 16 points 1 year ago

There must be exceptions for banks. Otherwise, brb gonna steal some easy £

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago
[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder where the book was written and set, i wonder

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gnuplusmatt@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

If governments the world over were as obsessed with solving things like the climate crisis and cost of living as they are with undermining encryption techs, we'd be living in a utopia by now.

They tried this here in Australia, luckily for us it got voted down. Iirc there's been other countries trying the same BS

load more comments (2 replies)

Earlier this month, junior minister Stephen Parkinson appeared to concede ground, saying in parliament's upper chamber that Ofcom would only require them to scan content where "technically feasible".

Big if true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gork@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The thumbnail for this article really bothers me. They just copy pasted the same string of 1's and 0's throughout the entire screen and colored it lime green on a black background for that Matrix effect.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I thought it was apropos… just as fake as the encryption solution now enshrined in law in the UK.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, looking at this article, there is no mention that they made end-to-end encryption illegal.

Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible.

Earlier this month, junior minister Stephen Parkinson appeared to concede ground, saying in parliament's upper chamber that Ofcom would only require them to scan content where "technically feasible".

So they would basically be scanning information WITHOUT end-to-end encryption

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

No no this is Reddit, I mean lemmy, we don't read articles we just react.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago
[-] slurp@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

This is openly misleading. This sucks, sure, but it doesn't ban e2ee as the title suggests.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

and as a last resort develop technology to scan encrypted messages, it has said

Right there in the article, my guy.

If you can scan encrypted messages then you've no longer got e2ee

[-] mrmojo@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1 line below, you can read

Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible. Earlier this month, junior minister Stephen Parkinson appeared to concede ground, saying in parliament's upper chamber that Ofcom would only require them to scan content where "technically feasible". Donelan said in response to questions about Parkinson's statement that further work to develop the technology was needed but government-funded research had shown it was possible.

In practice, I doubt this will have any consequence on encryption, as the title of this post suggests.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Backdoors make it "technically feasible" to scan "e2ee". See, it's all a matter of perspective.

[-] Zelet@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Fucking doublespeak (not you). If you can scan it then it isn’t e2ee. Words mean things. E2ee means that the two parties are the only two who can read the message. If there is a way to do any analysis on the message at all then it isn’t e2ee.

[-] Teppic@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

While I largely agree with you, technically it is still E2EE even if the encryption is very poor (e.g. hey look I shifted every character by one along the ASCII table).
Poor encryption could then be broken by a party in the middle.

All of that said this is a bit irrelevant, if the encryption is so poor the provider can break it at will, so can bad actors. We don't use broken (bad) encryption for a reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


LONDON, Sept 19 (Reuters) - Britain's long-awaited Online Safety Bill setting tougher standards for social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube and TikTok has been agreed by parliament and will soon become law, the government said on Tuesday.

"Today, this government is taking an enormous step forward in our mission to make the UK the safest place in the world to be online," she said.

Once the bill receives royal assent and becomes law, social media platforms will be expected to remove illegal content quickly or prevent it from appearing in the first place.

They will also be expected to prevent children from accessing harmful and age-inappropriate content like pornography by enforcing age limits and age-checking measures.

Instead it will require companies to take action to stop child abuse on their platforms and as a last resort develop technology to scan encrypted messages, it has said.

Earlier this month, junior minister Stephen Parkinson appeared to concede ground, saying in parliament's upper chamber that Ofcom would only require them to scan content where "technically feasible".


The original article contains 334 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Lolors17@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Are VPNs in the UK getting banned? If e2ee is getting banned for "online safety," many apps are at risk, but doesn't that mean that you could just install the apps via a VPN?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Is there anything I should be doing to protect myself from this bill if I live outside UK?

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

Yes, don't move to Slough

This is general life advice too

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grandel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Will this lead to companies ditching E2EE?

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Unlikely; more likely it will lead to UK politicians finding out that, like Russia, the UK isn’t as big a deal internationally as they assume it is at home.

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

To take a recent example, Microsoft considered just completely leaving the UK gaming console market if it fully blocked the buyout of blizzard activision, as it already won elsewhere and had good trial against the FTC in the U.S.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
273 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32091 readers
649 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS