587
submitted 6 days ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

CWs: Cory Doctorow, newsletter, mentions of his upcoming book that he's selling.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lime@feddit.nu 112 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Microsoft "invests" in Openai by giving the company free access to its servers. Openai reports this as a ten billion dollar investment, then redeems these "tokens" at Microsoft's data-centers. Microsoft then books this as ten billion in revenue.

[...] Nvidia ... "invest[s]" tens of billions in a data-center company, which then spends that investment buying Nvidia chips. The the same chunk of money being energetically passed back and forth between these closely related companies, all of which claim it as investment, as an asset, or as revenue (or all three).

investing back and forth, forever

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Feels like when banks could lend x10 times their wealth, they'd just borrow lots of money forth and back, infinite money (and a good old crash)!

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 33 points 6 days ago

This is actually kind of scary. These huge tech companies that, for better or worse, form the foundation of modern life, could collapse overnight if the chips fall a certain way.

[-] Cargon@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

investing back and forth, forever

[-] ArrrborDAY@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 10 points 6 days ago

We should tax financial transactions.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 6 days ago

i mean, there are no financial transactions in that quote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 79 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well Nvidia's the one laughing to the bank here; they've offloaded their GPUs for cash and stakes, and Microsoft/OpenAI/'AI' providers are the ones holding the bag (and GPUs).

Picks and shovels. The profiteers of the gold rush were the suppliers... I mean, Nvidia wants the grift to keep going, of course, but still.

[-] bigfondue@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They'll be hit hard also. Apparently about 50% of their sales revenue comes from 3 customers, almost certainly members of the Magnificent 7 buying GPUs for data centers. In the modern economy, a quarter without revenue growth is failure, but imagine double digit decline.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

I mean, their stock price will take a hit. But realistically, that is not necessarily bad for Nvidia as a company, as long as they are ready for the burst and don't over extend.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, exactly.

Their stock will tank, but financially? They will be fine. They'll go back to a more sane baseline market with an absolute mountain of cash and disturbing market share to show for it.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 15 points 6 days ago

Seriously. NVDA and AMD are the only ones who are going to profit from this. And the CEOs, of course.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago

Their golden parachutes are locked and ready.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 5 days ago

Yay! $300 billion was added to the GDP!

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Don't forget:

Government: "I see this sector displaying $300 billion GDP growth in one year!"

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago

We need a better tool than that old, easily-manipulated "stock market" to track value. Value needs to become real again, not always inflated, because "shareholders".

[-] Juice@midwest.social 13 points 5 days ago

Value is a mechanism that hides what actually creates value: human labor power

Energy & material extraction also create value.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 8 points 5 days ago

But who mines the materials? Natural resources are given to the oil and gas industries. The gasoline and fuels displace the value of human work by technological means, but the machines still need people to run them. The machines were built by workers. Without people doing stuff the oil and minerals just stay in the ground.

You can argue that oil and gas mineral industry mines the resources, but those resources, and the work it takes to extract them, is incredibly valuable to society. So who owns them, and why, becomes a political question.

Value is nothing but a store for human labor.

[-] nouben@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 days ago

It's not a tool to track value, it is gambling for rich folks

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Umm yes gambling kind of. But not as a regular customer. They are the house, and the house always wins long term.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And shareholder interests (create money!) make the too-big-to-fail companies think only in quarter year profits, turning them evil.

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

Anyone have any historical data on the dotcom bubble and what stocks benefited from the crash?

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If I had to guess, all the big companies that were deemed "to big to fail" and were bailed out.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 42 points 6 days ago

I feel like he missed a key opportunity to tell the kid asking “what do we do?” “You need to unionize. Collective effort and mutual aid will serve you better in life than most things.”

[-] Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org 28 points 5 days ago

It's a pyramid scheme, always has been... every decade for the last 30yrs there's been a few of them... The dot.com boom and bust of the 90's was the start, in the 2000's everything went 'digital' which was the same old shit with an LCD added to it and a doubling of the price, digital services for games/music/movies where they could take away what you bought... then they got even more serious in the 2010's where the real enshitification of the internet started... the 'cloud' where you were no longer allowed to own your own data, subscription fees for everything... 'smart' appliances that just tracked you and stole your privacy for the enrichment of a few billionaires... Crypotocurrency, the biggest scam and pyramid scheme to date... and now in the 2020's, crypto as a means to launder money and bribe politicians, massive corruption, fraud and consolidation of power by evil people and their corporate paymasters... and of course... the newest and worst pyramid scheme of them all... AI...

The only way to win is not to play... don't use it, disable it, remove it... every time you use it you are encouraging them to invade you life, take away your rights and exert control over what you can do and think... I know some of you will think that's an over reaction, you will learn one day that I and others were right to warn you as I have been doing for years now... But by then it will be too late, the climate is burning and these billionaires are trying to make it happen quicker, they value their wealth more than your very existence and they will hide away in their bunkers and private islands as the rest of humanity burns.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 39 points 6 days ago

Further: the topline growth that AI companies are selling comes from replacing most workers with AI, and re-tasking the surviving workers as AI babysitters ("humans in the loop"), which won't work. Finally: AI cannot do your job, but an AI salesman can 100% convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI that can't do your job, and when the bubble bursts, the money-hemorrhaging "foundation models" will be shut off and we'll lose the AI that can't do your job, and you will be long gone, retrained or retired or "discouraged" and out of the labor market, and no one will do your job.

I've been reading David Graeber. How many of these jobs are bullshit jobs that don't need doing in the first place?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe we should figure out which jobs aren't bullshit jobs.

With our efficiency there would be loads of people left out, maybe we should reinstate jobs like artists (real ones, not bullshit artists)?

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 days ago

Probably quite a few, but don’t let the fact they’re bullshit jobs fool you into thinking they don’t matter. The middle manager making $100K a year is spending that money on food, clothing, and other items that are produced by people who don’t have bullshit jobs.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You're right. These bullshit job kinda need to exist as people need to eat, and that's difficult without a steady income. We really do need to start talking seriously about a UBI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] llama@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago

I love how with the previous schemes like crypto, communities like this would have thought they were in on it, now with AI it's like nope not falling for that Spanish prisoner BS again.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Crypto allowes everyone to gamble. LLM hype only works for the owners, everyone else have only fugly pictures and schizophrenic texts

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 days ago

AI may not be profitable right now, but there's a lot more to "the magnificent 7" than AI that keeps them profitable. Even if the AI bubble popped, people would still be wasting their time on Facebook and Microsoft teams.

[-] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

They still have to make that money back somehow though. They can't just put a load of investment down on AI, make zero money off it (or worse, less than zero) and then expect everything to be fine with the existing profits. They need to raise revenue from existing streams to cover for the loss they just incurred by doing AI. That, or cut costs, which means layoffs, which means people have less money, meaning they spend less money, which means businesses make less money, so they do layoffs, and so on and so on leading to a recession.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

US taxpayes will be proud to carry this burden, as always.

Privatize profits, socialize losses. The American (and thus global) way

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 19 points 6 days ago

The fall is going to be epic.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I can't wait for a flood of liquidated A100/H100/MI300 servers. I'm in for the cheap rentals, if not buying one.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Absolute bubble for the datacenter middlemen and the AI software behemoth models that need data centers. The hardware companies though, and AI/LLMs overall, are here to stay and even if they waste some of their profits on investing in middlemen/datacenter/software customers, they can be profitable by inflating costs of their GPUs/hardware.

GPU depreciation matters, but tends to be relatively slow due to controlled incrementalism in hardware. Still, the high end faces the most risk, and Huawei/Alibaba won't be satisfied with small share gains over Nvidia to keep pricing gains. Even AMD is improving software stack fast enough to make affordable private AI. The low end has signficant disruption potential to the fossil powered datacenter/Skynet model.

It's not just an overall stock market bubble, it is a US GDP bubble. Where datacenter growth $ is larger than consumer spending growth $. Skynet for Israel control spending is an unstoppable corruption vector, and yes the champions of Israel must be financed and supported as geniuses by all media or "China and Iran will win."

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 18 points 6 days ago

My whale oil investments are looking pretty good now

[-] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I've chosen to put everything into gourd futures.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Don't forget a similar amount is tied up real estate and that bubble is already popping, starting in the SE

[-] plyth@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago

they would have to sell us $800 billion worth of services over the life of today's data centers

$100 for a yearly AI subscription for each human is possible. The problem is, which jobs do the people have to pay for it?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

$100 for a yearly AI subscription for each human is possible.

Or, more likely, companies doing something actually profitable will use AI and pay for it.

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

That's funny you think they will stop at just covering their costs once they have each and every human depending on their software. This is about infinite growth baby!

[-] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

It might be possible for people on the Fediverse. Lots of people working in the tech sector with a good salary. But we are not the norm.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
587 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4215 readers
994 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS