1251
Teams (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 146 points 6 months ago

Let’s not forget that all “return to office” mandates are really just a way for the C-suite to reduce headcount while appearing strong/decisive, avoiding negative press (and therefore spooking investors), and not having to pay severance.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a big fan of Teams. The fact that the software is named after a common organizational unit, and also a feature within the software is named after that same thing, is insane. Also, I haven’t seen such an unnecessary resource hog since the original Microsoft Edge.

[-] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 6 months ago

Wait till you hear about Word!

[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago
[-] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 months ago

what the fuck is with Windows App? it takes gigs and it's literally just an RDP wrapper.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago

Also literally no one uses it. Everyone just uses remote desktop which is still in windows anyway.

[-] perishthethought@piefed.social 8 points 6 months ago

And "office".

[-] Cruel@programming.dev 21 points 6 months ago

I blame people more than Microsoft. People were either duped or too lazy to say "Microsoft Teams" in full. It's not too crazy to have services like "Apple Music" because people aren't allowing Apple to control the word by just saying "Music" casually. People need to go back to saying "Microsoft Teams." Alas, it will never happen. 😒

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 16 points 6 months ago

"Microsoft" is too many syllables to say every time, "Apple" isn't.

[-] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

I've taken to say Fucking Teams™. Our company has Slack and our client uses Fucking Teams™ and it's a constant meme of audio not working, sharing not working, notifications not working, etc.

I just hate the thing. It's inferior in every way except that it's dirt cheap for the client and it's already there with office suite.

Office suite is another pet peeve of mine when it comes to sharing information. Just make a PDF! Do not share your .docx file. Half of my team don't even have an office suite installed. So we get 3 or 4 different renditions of the same document depending on where we open it in (Libre, Word regular, Word web, Google docs). Just make a god damn PDF!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Also:

Gotta keep the commercial real estate market from imploding.

Whole lotta corpo money and financing tied up in that, sure would be a shame if most office space just wasn't actually needed for most office work.

Also also:

Most managers just personally need the ability to neg employees in-person, even if it is detrimental to actual output, that doesn't matter, what matters is sating their need to feel powerful and important.

Anyway, Zoom did basically the same thing either earlier this year or last year... yep, Zoom employees, the people who make and sell business oriented virtual collaboration software... all need to RTO.

Found it: https://fortune.com/2024/07/09/remote-work-outlook-zoom-return-to-office-chief-people-officer/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 104 points 6 months ago

I don't know about you guys, but my company just mandated RTO a few months ago.

As expected, we now ~~spend~~ waste 8 hours: Commuting, Walking to and from meeting rooms, etc.

And the meetings, and the "collaboration", which are basically non stop all day long now, are just us talking round and round about all the things we need to do and how to do them for the 8th time, without actually doing them. But we sure LOOK really productive and busy. And I guess that's what management wants? Who knows.

With remote work I would do my job for 8+ hours per workday in pure focus mode. Knocking out solution after solution. You want XYZ to happen? Already done, here's a link to it. Have a meeting? Click join Teams call 1 minute early, listen and talk, while continuing to working on XYZ. You think we should try ABC for the XYZ project? Ok, I'll have it ready by tomorrow.

In office work is now spent walking from meeting to meeting, and you gotta leave 15 minutes before and it takes 15 minutes to get back and settled and you did not work on anything during. And they ask "so, how is project XYZ going?" "Good, good. Should be done in a few more weeks." And you maybe work on XYZ for 30 minutes uninterrupted that entire day, decide to skip any testing or QC, skip those extra features, skip checking with other teams if it will impact them, you have to skip all that to get it done on time. And it takes 3 weeks to do a 5 minute task. And it's inferior. And you talk about XYZ every meeting of every day, time after time, updates and statuses and comments on the ticket. And you finally announce you got XYZ completed and it's "yay good job" and management asks how the RTO is going and everyone is terrified to say "this is stupid and a gigantic waste of everyone's time and your money to put us in a giant expensive building just to not work on work, but to talk about working on work and we are getting only 10% done vs remote work". So we say "oh, fine" and management puts a little golden star on their report they made for themselves and they feel all warm and fuzzy that work is going great.

And thus, project XYZ was finally completed. A task that would have taken 1 person a few hours to do remotely, has now taken 8 people, 3 weeks of in office meetings and status updates and endless interruptions and discussions over every aspect of the project over and over again to finally complete. But we all LOOKED super busy doing it. And that's the important thing.

I'm personally, loving the RTO. I thought I would hate it, but I get to talk with friends all day and sit in meetings and daydream and the day flies by and I barely turned my brain on.

I'm happy to just do my job at home uninterrupted at my desk, but they sure don't seem to want that, so fine. Hope that works out.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 26 points 6 months ago

It's frustrating because management are so colossally, transparently, stupid but they get the big paychecks and the workers get fucked. And then like half the workers sit there going "Well this is just and fair. this is a good world. If the people actually doing the work had more of a say, that's communism and thus axiomatically bad"

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 15 points 6 months ago

Rise up and take back the means of production!

We should steal ~~The Declaration of Independence~~ Microsoft Excel!

But yeah, execs have no idea what all daily work looks like, but because they siphon 99% of the profits that we creat away from us and no matter how wasteful or unproductive everyone is, enough gets done that they STILL make millions off of us. So they don't care. We all suffer and get paid JUST enough to not riot, but they make millions and millions just by virtue of being the executive or owner.

I wonder how well a company would actually do if it was fully owned by all workers evenly.

Imagine Microsoft if every employee had the same % share in profits. Wonder what that would look like? I bet middle managers would stop wasting money left and right. I bet pointless projects would stop. Anything you do to make the company more efficient or profitable is celebrated and you actually get a share in that profit.

I also wonder if it would simply fail due to people wanting to coast and not pull their share.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

you gotta leave 15 minutes before and it takes 15 minutes to get back and settled and you did not work on anything during.

I forgot about that. Also, where is Meeting Room X again? Is it upstairs, in the other building, or is it the weird one down the hall and two lefts two floors down?

[-] psud@aussie.zone 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

During COVID my workplace had to go fully remote

IT has (left over from waterfall) some skills stronger in some states, so IT teams were reshuffled to get people from all over to balance them

So when we were allowed to return to the office, we were required to be there 3 days a week

With the spread out teams we had no in person meetings, we rarely saw team members even if they were on the same site

So we felt very much like the difference was to commute to do MS Teams meetings in the office on small screens three times a week, and have no commute and do MS Teams meetings on our own screens twice a week

We are lucky enough now to have full time work from home

Edit to add: management aren't on the same agreement as the rest of us, they have individual contracts. Very few of them have access to remote work

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 10 points 6 months ago

OMG right!?

I didn't even mention it in my main post, but half my team is out of state and exempt from RTO.

So half of us commute into an overcrowded office and walk to a meeting room just to join a damn teams call. I hate being in person without a headset and having to yell at a room microphone and look at a smaller screen than I have at home.

Everything about it is inferior than what we had at home. It is harder to hear, harder to see, harder to communicate, takes longer to commute, longer to have to walk to meetings vs click join.

All the RTO seems like execs playing "everyone else is doing it, don't want to be left behind" or something.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Remote work just makes it crystal clear that competent people can do their jobs with nearly no management. It's perfectly natural for management to be opposed to it.

[-] pohart@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago

My team just had a super productive in office day. I thought "wow I can see why people think in office is more productive" and then I realized my entire team was remote that day but me so it was more like a fully remote day for the team.

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

A task that would have taken 1 person a few hours to do remotely, has now taken 8 people, 3 weeks of in office meetings and status updates and endless interruptions and discussions over every aspect of the project over and over again to finally complete.

You're loving the RTO now, but then half a year later the management decides to fire dozens of people and replace them with this flashy new thing called AI, which gets the job done in 6 hours instead, even if buggy, and causing even more problems with unnoticed misinterpretations, but hey, 6 hours is so much less than 3 weeks, and we saved a lot of money!

And then the reduced staff will have to do even more work, get swamped, then gets replaced by AI (which still leads to inferior product), and by that point the management won't even consider RTO being the reason for all that inefficiency.

You could have done the job at home in 3-4 hours, but instead they shot themselves in the foot and still considered it a win.

Oh, and the office that they are renting and that is now half empty because of the reduced staff...? Suddenly it's not a problem like it was with remote working.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

We started doing all this stuff. For this and several other, similar reasons - our competitors are passing us by, quickly.

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 5 points 6 months ago

Oh that's encouraging. Good to know I'm on a sinking ship. I sorta assumed as much already though. The RTO mandates so many companies are doing almost feels like a desperate attempt to stay afloat and relevant, but is actually going to hasten the sinking.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

It's all the middle managers and Business Idiots who think they're so goddamn smart and effective at their jobs, wasting everyone's time because they're actually incompetent.

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

I cannot express how pleased I am that the company I work for went all-in on remote work during the pandemic and allowed the lease to lapse on most of their office space while sub-letting the rest. RTO is a literal impossibility for us now. We simply don't all fit in the remaining office space we have, and assuming new leases on more office space obviously looks terrible on quarterly reports.

There are many other ways that the company I work for is miserable, but I take the small victories where I can.

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 7 points 6 months ago

What's crazy is, so did mine.

Sold multiple office buildings.

Told us all, WFH is here to stay!

And then they blindsided us with a RTO mandate. And we do not all fit in the buildings. There isn't enough room by some thousand people and they don't seem to care.

The part that's even more insulting is that half my team live so far away (several US states away) they are exempt. So now half of us are forces to commute into a crowded building TO JOIN A TEAMS CALL! Ahhhhhh!

[-] the_joeba@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

I know a contractor working on teams. It was as eyerolling as you could expect.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 38 points 6 months ago

Was it Teams or Teams (New) or Teams (School & Work) or Teams....

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago

"Please sign out to sign in"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

The only reason people use teams over slack is that it comes bundled with everything else Microsoft makes, why make a good product when you can leverage your position in the market

[-] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

I've also heard that Slack get real expensive for larger enterprises.

[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 34 points 6 months ago
[-] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

Makes me laugh additionally because the modern conception of "dogfooding" in tech was popularized by Microsoft itself back in the 1990s. This is the opposite of dogfooding and really is a big condemnation of Teams as a software solution for connected work, at least on paper.

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago

Teams wasn't specifically built for remote work though. It was built for internal chat/messaging, document sharing, planning, etc. It is 100% used internally at MS even when people aren't working remotely.

I know because people at MS have been complaining about it since a few years before the pandemic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 6 months ago
[-] serpineslair@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I already knew where this link would take me XD.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

my guessteam team team team team? I even like saying the word team?

called it

[-] AnotherPenguin@programming.dev 16 points 6 months ago

The real problem here is thinking Teams is the same as all remote work solutions

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago
[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What’s on second.

[-] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago

... I bet they'd be able to work remotely if they switched to Slack :P

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 6 months ago

Of all things to poke Microsoft for this one makes no sense. Isn't understanding your weaknesses a strength?

[-] entwine@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago

An RTO mandate isn't growth. Growth would be if they mandated all hard drives containing Teams source code be thrown into a dumpster, and the dumpster lit on fire.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 6 months ago

I don't think microsoft understands shit. I think their leaders are out of touch, lying, idiots. They continue to exist based on inertia and past success.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
1251 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

31082 readers
311 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS