Ms Owens' lawyers have responded to the Macrons' lawsuit with a motion to dismiss, arguing that the case should not have been filed in Delaware, as she says it does not relate to her businesses, which are incorporated in the state. They claim forcing her to defend the case in Delaware would cause "substantial financial and operational hardship".
It definitely relates to her businesses since her business is primarily manufacturing and spreading bullshit.
And when such evidence is provided, Owens & co will move the goalposts and claim how it isn't sufficient evidence.
I look forward to MAGA mansplaining to us all how "being a woman is not just about two X chromosomes"
🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
They’ve been doing it since the Olympics (if not earlier), the female boxer who looked insufficiently female
Yeah except this is a court case. Like, make no mistake, she's gonna try to weasel around all this, but the evidence isn't for her to decide, it's for the court to say. Like, it's blatantly obvious that Owens has a clear disregard for the truth, but this evidence is being presented to the court to establish the actual truth that Macron is afab and sufficiently endosex as to not have this be a reasonable question. Owens will be free to disbelieve it if she likes, but if the court says that given the evidence there is no way a reasonable person party to this evidence can disbelieve this without a gross disregard for the truth then Owens can still be legally barred from saying it.
They should fucking bankrupt her, not just prevent her repeating the libel.
Well yes, this is aiming to go a similar route to Alex Jones and Sandy Hook. You start with defamation and fines and as they keep ignoring the court's demand that they stop you keep increasing punishment
Given that they aren't going to cut out her tongue, presumably the plan is to bankrupt her with fines when she predictably continues repeating libel
That’s now how the legal discovery process works
Of course they will. It reminds me of the Chappele’s Show skit about what kind of evidence he would need to actually believe a black man is guilty. We’re going to need Trump to personally watch her pee while lactating, with Steve Bannon, Ivanka, and Charlie Kirk present as witnesses.
Seriously, he's validating this BS?
Well they both have reason to feel very self-conscious about their marriage.
They're presenting evidence to a court in a defamation case. This isn't validating it at all, they're arguing the claims constitute gross disregard for the truth
I hate this transphobic present. Oh, you don't look exactly as we want you to look? Prove you're not trans, if you're not trans we'll leave you alone, if you are, we'll make your life a living hell.
Fuck.
Phrenology all over again
Good. She'll continue to parrot this type of bullshit whilst she is making money from doing it and feels safe enough to carry on.
She will carry on making others lives miserable until there are consequences.
Soon as you hit them with a monetary or physical consequence they will stop. Just ask Charlie Kirk...
I would ask Charlie but......
Why has he been so quiet recently? He's usually busting a blood vessel trying to mouth off. Sometimes I wished he'd wind his neck in...
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
Posts must be:
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!