835
tall tails (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 210 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think dinosaurs were taking x-rays of beaver tails, my dude. Go read a book sometime.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

Don't velociraptors have xray vision though?

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

That's why they're called velociraptors.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

I thought they were called like this because of their love of bicycles.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Jaws was never their scene.

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, you're thinking of the much more dangerous "acceleraptors". Velociraptors were very different from how they are commonly portrayed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Only on weekends

[-] zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

This may seem cheesy or pathetic, and I apologize for that, but I want to say: thank you for catching me off guard with your silly comment and giving me a badly-needed smile and laugh when I'm fucking miserable and in a lot of pain. It's been a while. Seriously, I appreciate it. You're a hoot :)

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 111 points 2 weeks ago

So one of the biggest leaps they have made in reconstruction over the last few decades is matching similar bone structure that supports soft tissue. It doesn't work for all soft tissue, but if the beavers tail bones have bumps or other features that hint at supporting extra soft tissue there is a chance.

All the stuff birds have, like inflatable neck sacks and feathers that move with muscles are examples of things we absolutely wouldn't get with fossils that are even better than a beaver tail.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago

Well, now I want to see an artist's rendition of a T. rex doing this:

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

The Prehistoric Planet documentary series does it with sauropods, it’s pretty sick.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

i'm also a big fan of carnotaurus' tiny piddly arms being brightly colored on the inside and them waving them around like mad

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The idea of non-avian dinosaurs with the diverse features and behaviors birds have is very fun to me, and I hope fictitious depictions of birdsaurs becomes as common as classic dinosaurs's.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I want to see a T. Rex do this.

[-] sleen@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

I always appreciate an enthusiastic and educational response to situations like this.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Also, in 40 million years, you can match the beaver fossils to the bones of their still living descendants and find similar features.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 weeks ago

I mean… you can see the processes (bony protrusions on the vertebrae) are long and flat and only transverse (sticking out the sides, not up/down) so… it would be pretty obvious it was a flat tail? Sure maybe they might not get that it wasn’t fuzzy without any fossils if it, and maybe they make it slightly less round, but they’re scientists not idiots. Yeah some has come a long way and some older models sucked sure but it ain’t like we are vibe coding their appearance.

[-] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

Vibe coded lion:

[-] aramova@infosec.pub 65 points 2 weeks ago

This is some real RFK level science here.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s sneaking up on creationist levels of ‘science’, like where they argue recreations of Australopithecus are just ‘imagination’ and present their own version of Lucy as as a quadriped, completely ignoring the overwhelming evidence from her skeleton that she could not have walked that way (and also ignoring that we have hundreds of other specimens of her species).

It really seems that lots of people’s conception of these fields is based on very outdated concepts, either unaware or ignoring all the evidence and advancements of the past 50 years or so.

[-] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago
[-] latenightnoir 32 points 2 weeks ago

All dinosaurs had beaver tails, got it!

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago

That is one cute beaver pic on the left. PM more of your beavers.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 25 points 2 weeks ago

They always use mammals for that kind of comparison. Show me a reptile with that kind of muscle/fat composition.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The phylogenetic definition of reptile includes birds, so... Penguins, I suppose?

[-] lengau@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Birds? You mean the last remaining dinosaurs?

[-] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Dinosaurs were not reptiles. They were warm blooded, and birds descended from them.

[-] abir_v@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Birds are reptiles. Commonly, we wouldn't say so, but they're in the same clade. The avians are closer related to the crocadilians than the crocs are to other reptiles like the squamates - lizards and snakes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Sure but also there are some fossils that DO have skin, and some even have preserved organs. And some have feathers, which is a pretty good indicator that there wasn’t some large feature we’re missing.

No doubt we are wrong on lots of counts, but I think we have good evidence for a lot of it as well.

[-] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago

One thing I wouldn't mind AI to do, train a model with standardised data like this, and have it match the reconstruction. After that it can use common and less common reconstructions. After that try to map as much info from a dinosaur fossil to said standardised data structure and generate possible reconstruction for said dinosaur

[-] echindod@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

Oh. I like this idea. This is the kind of thing AI would be good for.

[-] sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

Do beavers enjoy..... Uppies??

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

I like to imagine T. rex arms were small because that's how they communicated with their octopus rider.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They evolved to be small so they cold more easily fit into the actuator gauntlets that controlled the Gundam.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

What a marvellous time for paleobootyology.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We do now know that dinosaurs were the forbearers of birds. Those that told us they were reptiles still continue to push that however. They were warm blooded and it is now thought they had some sort of pre feathers.

I believe the same thing applies to archeology, The Experts claim to have an answer to every question and impute things on the ancient cultures that they have no way of knowing.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

The Experts claim to have an answer to every question

That's not my experience at all. "The Experts" are extraordinarily cautious to make assertions even when they're well supported. They talk about "models" and are happy to revise and update their positions when contrary evidence emerges.

Pseudo scientists have answers for everything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They look at related and similarly adapted modern animals when trying to make visualizations of fossils, it's not all just guessing.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Now I want to see some pics of dinosaurs with beaver tails

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

This was a problem, which is nowadays accounted for.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

now think about apple fossils

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Steve Jobs?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
835 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16910 readers
722 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS