One day in 2012 at McDonald's drive thru, talking to a real human on site through the speaker just like the good old days, I ordered
"A Filet o' Fish."
Imagine my surprise at the dollar total and when they handed me a bag of
EIGHT Filet o' Fish.
Amazing level of critical thinking going on at the window when they didn't double check that, lol.
See, this is why I though AI drivethroughs would be fine. A certain number of mistakes are already made.
Hilarious, what a hero. Thank you king, this is the way to fight unsecure AI slop while they pretend its a legitimate reason to halve their workforce.
🎶 There goes my hero 🎶
Since 2023, the fast-food chain has introduced the technology at over 500 locations in the US, with the aim of reducing mistakes and speeding up orders.
Bullshit, they just want to save money by replacing employees with AI.
Step 1: replace all your workers with AI Step 2: set new record for unemployment Step 3: most people can't afford your product Step 4: increase the price to compensate for decreasing sales Step 5: blame Obama
Step 1: Replace your executive and board members with LLMs. Despite LLMs being increadibly unintelligent, there will be no loss of leadership IQ in the corporation because they were already unintelligent enough to put a LLM where it doesn't belong because they don't understand what it is and what it isn't.
Step 2: Enjoy the savings of those large useless eater salaries you no longer have to pay.
Oh shit, I didn't even notice that part. Yup, that's a whopper, and not the kind you eat.
They don't even reduce cost from the savings. They charge the exact same amount until they want to increase prices.
This is a problem that requires zero AI.
A touchscreen kiosk is all you need to have the customer place their own order. You just need to have 2-3 ordering stations as they will be slower than trainer staff.
But shareholders demand AI
I still can't add onions to my mcchicken on the kiosk. I demand humans back!
Touchscreen kiosks are hard to reach through car windows.
Of course, the real solution is banning drive-throughs because they're fucking terrible urbanism to begin with:
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2020/9/21/no-we-still-dont-need-drive-throughs
https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/24/business/drive-thru-fast-food-chick-fil-a-urban-planning
People use touchscreens for accessing ATMs in the States.
Don't see why this couldn't be possible for fast food. There's proven technology that already exists
Edit: Just to add, fuck cars. And fuck anti-urban infrastructure. Maybe we should do away with touchscreens for fast food, as well as other pro car infrastructure. At least not incentivize it
People use touchscreens for accessing ATMs in the States.
Have you ever noticed how frequently they end up partially opening the car door and leaning out in order to reach (either because of a mismatch between screen height and car window height, or because they didn't have the precision driving skills to pull in close to the machine without hitting it)? It's pretty often, just sayin'. But yes, it could be done the same way for fast food.
On a related note, I kinda miss the old pneumatic tube systems banks used to use, despite them being car-centric.
Have you ever noticed how frequently they end up partially opening the car door and leaning out in order to reach (either because of a mismatch between screen height and car window height, or because they didn’t have the precision driving skills to pull in close to the machine without hitting it)?
No, because I burn 6 calories and walk into the bank.
Man, I never used fast food, or drive throughs as much as I have since I developed a mobility disorder. Last week I put a pickup order in at my local coffee shop out of habit, and couldn't carry both my coffee and the breakfast sandwich to my car at the same time. Which sounds so stupid, but it took so much extra energy for both trips into the store that I was ready to go home and call it a day after that lol
I know the answer is "don't get fast food and just eat at home", but I've also been so tired after work/school that I'm not eating, and I dunno what the answer to that is either. My state isn't a place where people think about how to care for their communities, and most of it has hours of highway between "cities"
I know the answer is “don’t get fast food and just eat at home”
No it's not. Well, at least not in terms of urbanism/mobility, anyway; YMMV on your household budgeting.
The answer is that you shouldn't have to get in a car at all between your home and your local coffee shop to begin with. It should be no more than a short walk (or wheelchair ride or whatever), door to door.
It's a mile, and across an interstate exit, to my nearest bus stop. And I live in the only city in the enormous state that takes public transportation seriously.
I think I feel bad when I read articles like the ones you posted, before this I'd cross the distances and not think much of it because my last two cities didn't have public transportation. Now I can't cross fast enough to beat the crossing light, and it's so incredibly unsafe if I fall. I feel like the problem, I guess
It's a mile, and across an interstate exit, to my nearest bus stop. And I live in the only city in the enormous state that takes public transportation seriously.
Your first sentence contradicts your second. Clearly, there are zero cities in your enormous state that take public transportation seriously.
It's crazy how most Americans have absolutely zero concept of just how bad even "good" infrastructure and city design in the US is, or how much better it could be.
God damn. I was just about to invite you to the fuck cars community. In doing so, I needed the like with the !.
In trying to find it on the sidebar, I see you've found that community. As a mod.
Which means the whole basis for my comment is void before I even typed it!
On a similiar note....can you put the ! link in the sidebar?
LOL, guilty as charged!
On a similiar note…can you put the ! link in the sidebar?
If it's the best solution to your problem, sure! But is it?
There's nothing specific to !fuckcars about your request, so I'm not sure individual action by me is the right answer. Do you know of any examples of other communities that do the same? Have you made a thread somewhere like !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml or !fediverse@lemmy.world proposing it as a standard convention? Have you filed a feature request suggesting that the built-in community link at the top of the sidebar be changed to display the fully-qualified name with exclamation point, or that a button be added next to it to copy the correct text to your clipboard, or something like that?
I forgot that US cars are so massive that this is a problem.
Agree on the urban planning part.
You could basically get around this with 4 programmers and an expectation around word choice. Voice to text has improved massively, you could just require them to say menu items with modifiers
Not that I disagree about drive throughs in concept, but this is just another problem easily solved by anything but raw LLMs
Completely right. People forget technology like Amazon's Alexa (not an endorsenent) existed before LLMs. Speech recognotion just got better.
I actually don't know why entering your own order hasn't taken off more, come to think of it.
Chick-fil-A even went the other way, putting 4 high schoolers out in the weather for it. Cold, hot, raining, doesn't matter.
With them I'm willing to just put it down to general crazyness.
Also software voice recognition and using this for a shopping cart/order placement system (via phone line) has been a thing since the early 2000s, i know some mail order shops in Germany who used this.
This is not AI failing to do an easy job. This is "unskilled" labor doing complex and demanding work that cannot be duplicated by trillion dollar software.
I mean, unskilled just means minimal extra training is needed, not that it's not complicated. Actual non-complicated jobs were automated last century in the West.
Tbh this is an incredibly easy fix, either cap the number of waters someone can order in software or have an override where a human takes over if an order is suspicious, there's not an infinite number of ways to fuck with this.
The point is that loopholes in software will always exist that lead to unexpected outcomes.
that's what happens 99% of the time. It's kinda been a trend on the anti clanker side of TikTok, just order a large amount of stuff so a human takes over and actually helps you
Computer can't understand voices good enough so they think you say something different. For example standard voice to text has failed me for years. Voice control for years and years has still failed me. Using gps? fail every time because the computer or phone in this case thinks i say other words that sound nowhere the same. This is before and after AI. The biggest problem is voice recognition of words. Humans can separate sound and frequency better. Ear drums are better than microphones. Even in quite environments i have a voice that doesn't get translated properly and fails more often than it doesn't. So AI is going to glitch on a lot of voices too because the voice recognition part still works the same flawed way with flawed microphone technology.
"That's a 'you' problem." -- Tech bros, probably
Ear drums are better than microphones
What do you mean about this part? A quality microphone is basically the same thing, although the impedance matching is achieved different ways.
At least i want to believe ear drums being flesh vibrate differently than non organic materials, cells squeeze and contract. The shape of the ear drum is different and the electric signal in the human body is different than electronic devices. It's just a tiny tiny amount in a human. higher voltages like outside the body change and shape the sound a bit or cause distortions of certain wavelengths of the sound. Just my general idea. I had an ex girlfriend who had a wind up shortwave radio and if using it wound up instead of plugged in to AC or battery she could hold a signal on to a weak station. And no matter the power of the other stations there was less static and distortions on easy to get broadcast or hard to get broadcast. This was just a pocket radio. The flow of electricity is different between those method ac vs dc. Was the kind that winded down as you use it. Power is more stable during wind up or something. I could be a little bit wrong on the radio part because i would have to have my ex girlfriend show me again and no way am i going to go talk to her after over 15 years.
You know what would reduce mistakes and speed up orders? Replacing the god-awful audio equipment that every drive thru seems to use. It wouldn't cost much to install good audio equipment and it would quickly pay for itself in time savings since people could hear each other more clearly.
I can’t imagine what it is reliable enough for.
Apparently it's good with knots.
it's not 'ai', it's just a poorly trained voice recognition system that's trying to decipher any random person's voice. voice rec has a difficult-enough time when trained on a single person in a professional setting (lawyer, doctor, etc)--which is work we used to do here. it's going to absolutely fail in a 'drive thru' environment.
it's not 'ai', it's just a poorly trained voice recognition system that's trying to decipher any random person's voice.
I’m baffled that you can say “It’s not ‘AI,’ it’s a machine learning powered speech to text system” with a straight face.
Even if we were to agree that ML-powered speech to text isn’t AI (and I don’t agree to that premise, for the record), there’s still the matter of processing the transcription to transform it into something that can be understood by the point of sale system - aka natural language processing. And while that NLP could be implemented without use of an LLM, given LLM’s current level of hype and the ease with which they can be shoved into any given product, I wouldn’t bet on Taco Bell execs approving such an approach, much less asking for it.
And none of that is AI, if we use the term in a way that's useful and stop speaking in salesspeak. Machine learning algorythms, LLMs, all of that isn't AI in any meaningful sense of the word. It's all semantics of course, but the more sam altmans of the world are trying to blurry the line between intelligence and an algorythm that can identify a picture of hotdog, the more we kinda need to be stickers for the proper terminology. It was kinda cute at the beginning of this crazy cycle, but now when megacorpos are demanding all your data and putting their half-baked chatbots into everything, it's not cute anymore.
Please, enlighten me - how do you propose we use the term “AI” in a way that’s more useful than a definition that includes machine learning, large language models, and computer vision?
I doubt I’ll agree with your definition, but I’m curious to see how you would exclude machine learning, computer vision, LLMs, etc., from your definition. My assumption is that your definition is going to be either a derivative of “AI is anything computers can’t do yet” or based on pop culture / sci fi, but maybe you’ll surprise me.
To be clear, I’m a software engineer; I’m not speaking in sales speak. I’ve derived my understanding of the term from a combination of its historical context and how it’s used in both professional and academic contexts, not from marketing propaganda or from sci fi and pop culture. I’m certainly aware of the hype machine that’s ongoing, but there are also tons of fascinating advancements happening on a regular basis, and the term “AI” is at minimum a useful term to refer to technologies that leverage similar techniques.
"It's not AI, it's just <multiple things that all fall under the category of Artificial Intelligence>".
AI is a huge field of computer science. It's not the one tiny narrow definition of artificial general intelligence like HAL 9000 or Skynet or Detroit Become Human.
Years ago, I was ripped to shreds for saying AI would be a disaster.
Years ago, I was ripped to shreds for saying Elon Musk will be a disaster.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/