633
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Elliott@lemmy.world 153 points 2 years ago

Lauren Boebert needed 4 tries to pass a GED. She's the perfect representation of the Republican party now.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Lol what a fucking idiot

[-] nao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I was reading another thread and wondering who she was

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 95 points 2 years ago

Hilarious. You could do better than Biden, America, but I respect this reaction more than the incessant screaming of the toddler you had before.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago

Biden was the concession. Few really wanted him. The rest just knew he was white and vanilla enough to alienate as few swing voters as possible.

Anything to get trump out of office.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

And now we're gonna fuckin do it again.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Do we have a real choice?

I don't think we do.

If the choice is between a precariously old octogenarian and a completely unhinged authoritarian octogenarian who doesn't believe in democracy, I guess I know which way I'll vote every time.

[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

And now we have to do it again

FTFY

[-] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Harder this time TBH

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

To be honest, neither Biden nor any other politician should receive praise or respect for behaving this way, for it is the bare minimum that's expected from them.

We're just used to the craziness of the other side. Anyone behaving like the Republicans during the GW Bush era or earlier would have been ostracized from the political landscape.

So, don't feel respect for the expected decency of a politician. Feel rage for the indecent one, and show it with your votes!

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I would, but I’m Canadian.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't get you're trying to imply by you being Canadian... are your politicians better or worse than the American ones?

Edit: I get it now.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’m implying that I can’t vote in America; I have no disagreements with your comment otherwise.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh hehe I had a brainfart. Understood.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You sure about that? Did you see the numbers in the last election?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Yeah I’m pretty sure I respect a man that brushes off unfounded allegations more than one that cries like a toddler when caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

Election numbers have no bearing on my respect for a person.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

My comment wasn't about the respect. It was about Americans ability to do better.

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

he hugs too much 😂

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

Clearly Bidens son Hunter has issues and has done some clearly shady, if not outright illegal things, but this does not immediately make Biden complicit in his son's actions. Anyone who can read or has eyes will realize this all theater and will go nowhere just like the Clinton investigations.

[-] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago

I think the entire point is to smokescreen and deligitimize Trump's legal situation by trying to show people "look, we're doing the same thing they are doing to us!" Doesn't matter if it's completely different, or if it even goes anywhere legally. A lot of people will either not take the time to follow both cases or they'll be disenfranchised enough to tune out altogether, which is exactly what they're hoping for.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Look what they did to Hillary. They created so much smoke about Benghazi people still think there was a fire.

Truly the fall of civilization is when a critical mass of people don't know how to think critically and believe only what the angry people tell them.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

...which managed to peel just enough voters off to make donnie's bid for office in 2016 a possibility that actually happened.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 46 points 2 years ago

I do love his approach but it would also be neat to see him talk the same shit trump did and blame the republikkkans for a witch hunt. Which is exactly what they are doing. I also really wish he would have the trump children investigated as thoroughly as his son and Hillary have been.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

I feel that would validate the republican clown show too much.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep. They go out of their way to make words lose meaning. Notice after Jan 6 they've been labeling anything dems do as an "insurrection." It's so their base sees anything horrendous that Republicans do as tit for tat, and the dumbass enlightened centrists can say "bOtH sIdEs" as they do.

Saying "OK go for it you got nothing" is much better optically.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Reflexively downvoting anyone conflating "both sides", "enlightened centrists" etc. Whole system is a disaster and sick of people acting like the "oppression lite" party is off limits for criticism. Anyone who doesn't just compromise their principles to go with the flow politically knows better.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

If people who disapprove of fascism don't vote, well then, we get fascism.

Doesn't matter if you think it's not your fault; we still get fascism.

Doesn't matter if you say the whole system is a disaster; we still get fascism.

Doesn't matter if you pinky-swear to go punch a Nazi instead of voting; we still get fascism and you go to prison.

I promise you, the fascists will show up and vote for fascism.

Personally, my principles say "fascism is bad, let's not have one of those" and I don't believe in compromising on that.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, the classic "lesser of two evils" stance to justify an arbitrary formation of social support behind "literally anything better than the worst possible thing". And in this context right now, actually being used to shut down all criticism of anything besides the "worst possible thing". No awareness at all about all the other better alternatives. You could actually prove that this mentality drives the status quo further towards "fascism" or any other negative totalitarian outcome, because you're specifically forbidding criticism of what's going wrong with who you support.

It is not a well thought-out stance.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yes but also every accusation is a confession with them, they’re screaming about a laptop while handing out security clearances to their kids and quietly funneling Saudi money all over. Let’s look at that more publicly

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago

Honestly he spends his time better than all of that.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 2 years ago

Special good luck to those Republican Reps who come from districts Biden won. You are those that will get attention.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 20 points 2 years ago

Impeachment is an empty threat at this point. He might not even show up if it goes to trial.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I'm glad he responded to this. But I wish he would've hit harder. Shame doesn't work with the current GOP.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago

I disagree. I think he's better off doing his job competently than engaging in GOP tabloid headline generators.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's also a fair point.

[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If the Republicans held Trump to the same standards as they're trying to hold Biden to, Donald would have been ousted from office and not cleared of two attempted impeachments.

Because on a scale of 1 to the Trump dynasty, Hunter's wrongdoing is about a 3.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

"Good luck with that fellas, let me know how that goes for ya!"

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
633 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24814 readers
2048 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS