106
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Key factions of the House Republican conference reached a tentative agreement Sunday to keep the government funded temporarily and avert a shutdown currently scheduled for the end of this month, pairing it with a conservative border security measure, multiple GOP sources with knowledge told NBC News.

House Republicans released a bill after a tentative agreement between the far-right Freedom Caucus and the center-right Main Street Caucus, the sources said. The deal, which keeps the government funded through Oct. 31 but includes cuts to domestic spending, is expected to pave the way to pass a defense spending bill this week that has been tied up in the standoff between Republican leadership and the far-right.

If the legislation passes the House, it would resolve one internal problem for Speaker Kevin McCarthy while creating a new one. The controversial immigration provisions and reduced spending levels make it all but guaranteed to die in the Democratic-led Senate, meaning it could do more to hasten a shutdown at the end of September than prevent one.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

SEC. 2010. OPERATION STONEGARDEN.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT .—There is established in the Department a program to be known as ‘Operation Stonegarden’, under which the Secretary, acting through the Administrator, shall make grants to eligible law enforcement agencies, through State administrative agencies, to enhance border security in accordance with this section.

Well that's escalating fast. This would allow local police to "enhance" border security, which is... Ungood. So this is obviously going to die in the Senate.

To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a law enforcement agency shall
...
a State or territory with a maritime border.

Ah shit, we're going to give a ton of money to Florida's State army. Boo!

Man, Division C of this just sucks giant donkey balls. Also, some of it doesn't even make math sense. Use the budget allocation pre-2021 for 900 miles of solid wall? There's not enough dinero amigo! And yes, even with the oh so clever item (3):

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall waive all legal requirements necessary to ensure the expeditious design, testing, construction, installation, deployment, integration, operation, and maintenance of the physical barriers, tactical infrastructure, and technology under this section

Just ignoring all the construction regulations isn't going to save that much money on nine followed by two zeros of miles of solid wall in a lot of the land that Congress is requiring. It's just a non-doable thing, even if we were building the wall out of papier-mâché. Also the whole "oh don't worry about documenting anything during the construction" that seemed to work "oh so well" with the PPP loans. Let's clearly do that again.

Oh also of note is the lack of any guidance on E-Verify. Clearly we cannot be going after "innocent" employers who "forgot" to check if the person was a legal immigrant or not.

All I have to say is that whole thing is a BIG ASK for just kicking the can to October.

SEC . 101. (a) Such amounts as may be necessary, at a rate for operations as provided in the applicable appropriations Acts for fiscal year 2023

Just FYI for anyone who doesn't know. The US fiscal year is from Oct. 1 to Sep. 30. So FY23 ends on September 30th and that's literally the first thing this bill covers. "We're just going with it until the end of FY23."

All I'm going to say is that I'm putting a shiny quarter on this being told to pound sand by the Senate. Just a hunch.

[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It has nothing to do with florida or a wall. It sounds like its all about letting Texas keep their murder bouys on the Rio Grande.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

True. But the bouy bullshit is hot news right now. Since last week they were ordered to take them down last week. Now, those laws are in direct opposition to the reason they were forced to take them down.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The government could be funded for the next century if they wanted to do it. They would rather kick the can down the road little by little.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It lets them scream and cry into a camera.

Favorite part of their job. American politics is just acting for ugly people.

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Amazing, how did two relatively right wing parties take this long to agree on something?

[-] raxer@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

They didn’t. It took this long for one of the parties to agree on something…

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lol what are you on about? if one group agrees with the other, then they’re agreeing on something.

Also, how about those downvotes right? Two party chuds sipping the copium

[-] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Hostage taker negotiates' favourable terms for himself - with himself.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

House Republicans sounds like a 90s techno band

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If only they were as cool as the 90s though.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
3090 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS