133
submitted 2 months ago by thallamabond@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LuckingFurker 76 points 2 months ago

If I get ID'd to watch youtube that would just encourage me to not use youtube anymore

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Yup, that's the point where I switch. Already got rid of Chrome a long time ago.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago

Time to learn about Invidious, Freetube, and alt frontends.

[-] LuckingFurker 10 points 2 months ago

Nah, I think I'll use the opportunity to get away from it outright. And really if more people did do that youtube would roll it back pretty quickly

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also, what's stopping Google from killing alt front-ends altogether by either completely login-walling YT, including for G-rated and PG-rated content and not just the age-gated stuff, implementing DRM platform-wide on YT and not just on paid commercial content ala movies or TV produced by one of the media conglomerates like they already implement DRM on, or both, at some point in the future?

Alt front-ends still work for now, but Google could kill them outright at any time, and I just mentioned two ways they could do that: hard login-walling or platform-wide DRM, or both.

[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

If the system has inaccurately called out a viewer as a minor, the mistake can be corrected by showing YouTube a government-issued identification card, a credit card or a selfie.

YouTube, "Oops, we made a mistake, please give us ID to correct our mistake"

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

I've used a debit card to verify being 18+ when I was 15. My own debit card.

Does it just assume that you're 18+ if you have one?

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago
[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You misspelled "deez"

[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago

Backup YouTube now. Be sure to embed chapters, metadata and sub titles.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Sure I’ll just put that on my 10 Exabyte drive. On my 100Gbps connection.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Obviously only the channels/specific videos of importance to you. No one is realistically proposing backing up all of YT.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I dream of the day we don’t rely on one host for user content like YouTube. I worry for the history of the content there.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I always secretly hoped one of the big porn companies would step up and start a competing service, since they're probably the only ones with the necessary infrastructure already in place.

[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I backed up a few dozen channels on a spare 3TB drive. Planning on making torrents to add to a seedbox later.

[-] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

What’s the best method for maintaining quality when backing up a YT vid?

[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

yt-dlp usually picks the best flags by default but may need your browser cookies. I usually manually set <=1080p

[-] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Does it dependent on connection speed, or does it fully buffer before capturing? I find sometimes there’s some sections that will refuse to improve even if going back and replaying sometimes. Though I also wonder if sponsorblock can cut out sponsor segments from the finished product. Guessing it’s either/or?

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

I'm working on my music playlist. It's 1200 videos long and yt-DPP only gets Patr of the list. How can I download the full list?

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

You mean it's skipping some of the entries in the actual playlist, or it's just only getting the first x entries and then stopping?

I haven't personally found a solution to random skipping to that other than allowing yt-dlp to use your account credentials/cookie to act as though it's a signed-in user. YouTube is randomly deciding to block either some or all download attempts from non-signed-in clients, like yt-dlp.

If it's just stopping after x number of videos, I have absolutely no clue.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

The first 98/1200 vids, something about api page 1

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

Aren't there already basically projects for this? Seems like there's a local download leftover on a newpipe server when someone plays a video through it?

I know very little about this, but seems like if was a reason for "why running your own newpipe server could be troublesome"

[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Nothing unified I'm aware of. I figured the YouTube ID thing would push pirate sites to add sections though.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Are you confusing NewPipe for Piped?

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds like something I'd do.

Was thinking "was new pipe the right project to reference in that comment" and I don't think it was.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 22 points 2 months ago

Oh, no thanks. I had fascism yesterday.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Can we complain and get that off the menu, please?

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

PeerTube, here i come

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why does YouTube verify age at all? Isn't their content censored in the first place?

So it's all about data harvesting and nothing more.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sometimes there may be mention of dangerous words like "gun" instead of "pew-pew" or "killed" instead of "unalived".

Have to keep the kids safe.
/s

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Shocked, yes shocked I am to find enshittification going on in this Google establishment.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 months ago

YouTube can go fuck itself

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

You ever see some woman on the street and think "god damn!" ? Then you look closer and realize theyre probably 16? Lets skip that and just assume theyre all 18 or over I guess. Thanks AI!

/s

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I was doing some research this morning and this is also happening with porn sites. VPN works, but these are dark times.

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Right after they fucking neutered yt-dlp

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago
[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There’s an issue where dlp is forced to download a shitty 360p version of the vid you want because it needs cookies or something. There’s a fix on GitHub but you can’t just yt-dlp your link anymore without doing that fix

[-] krunklom@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

i never liked yourube. i have barely ever watched it. and it has been a huge driver pf the enshitifcation of the internet since its debut, as more and more content became bideo content, and accessing useful information in text form became more and kore difficult.

it is kind of hard for me to have strong feelings about something that, in my opinion, has always sucked ass, sucking more ass

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

News

32818 readers
1932 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS