Could some hero remotely reprogram the sattelites to permanently ignore such commands—and future programming updates—while still sending us data?
And how horrible of an idea would that be?
Could some hero remotely reprogram the sattelites to permanently ignore such commands—and future programming updates—while still sending us data?
And how horrible of an idea would that be?
Should be possible to send an update so future updates are only allowed if they're signed with a key cipher, then destroy the cipher. Basically put ransomware on it. Would need someone high up the chain to bypass whatever software checks are in place to keep someone from sending bad firmware up.
But the satellite orbits will eventually destabilize. If the satellite manages its own orbit, it could live out the rest of its planned lifespan, but de-orbiting then would be uncontrolled. Shouldn't cause too much risk, things happen already, but we try to set them down far away from civilization.
But if the satellite's orbit is managed from a central ground system, which I would assume is the case because that's the easiest way to reduce risk of collisions, then all the affected satellites would de-orbit at random in the upcoming months to years. Depending on how many are affected, could cause (probably) minor risk, but it would be in the news constantly for years, and the general public would probably lose favor of space operations, resulting in budget cuts and fewer satellites.
But IANARS, YMMV
I mean this very genuinely. When the next admin comes into office I hope they fire every single person who was involved in it and didn't stop it.
If you're the guy pressing the buttons to make the satellite de orbit quit your fucking job before doing this.
When the next admin comes into office
If there is a next admin.
That said, something has to be done with conservatives destroying infrastructure faster than can be rebuilt, same thing happened with the UK's high speed rail program.
The meek "left" in the US and the UK is not the intstrument to do that though.
"... That farmers depend on"
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.