35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

Could some hero remotely reprogram the sattelites to permanently ignore such commands—and future programming updates—while still sending us data?

And how horrible of an idea would that be?

[-] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Should be possible to send an update so future updates are only allowed if they're signed with a key cipher, then destroy the cipher. Basically put ransomware on it. Would need someone high up the chain to bypass whatever software checks are in place to keep someone from sending bad firmware up.

But the satellite orbits will eventually destabilize. If the satellite manages its own orbit, it could live out the rest of its planned lifespan, but de-orbiting then would be uncontrolled. Shouldn't cause too much risk, things happen already, but we try to set them down far away from civilization.

But if the satellite's orbit is managed from a central ground system, which I would assume is the case because that's the easiest way to reduce risk of collisions, then all the affected satellites would de-orbit at random in the upcoming months to years. Depending on how many are affected, could cause (probably) minor risk, but it would be in the news constantly for years, and the general public would probably lose favor of space operations, resulting in budget cuts and fewer satellites.

But IANARS, YMMV

Edit: oh cool, they're just abandoning them, so we get the mass unplanned deorbit route

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7136 readers
381 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS