1131
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 352 points 6 days ago

Don't just move to Codeberg; donate to them too.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 90 points 6 days ago

Codeberg has a lot of restrictions regarding private repositories and... complicated verbiage regarding what licenses they want for public repositories.

For public repositories... do you think that MS et al can't already scrape all of that?

I am all for telling MS to go fuck themselves. But it is important people actually understand what they are and aren't getting in terms of privacy and the like. It is like how people still sometimes pretend that the completely open site where just about anyone can run an instance has LESS ai scraping than a reddit.

[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 77 points 6 days ago

The key point about codeberg as I understand it is it’s meant for foss projects. It’s not really much more complex than that. Want to host non-free software, or want to use it for your company’s private code repository? They don’t want that on their servers, so either find an alternative or self-host forgejo, which is the same code (derived from gitea) that powers codeberg itself.

[-] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

i just wanted to drop my personal favorite self-hosted git alternative, Gogs (gogs.io). i have very modest git needs (i just need a place to host code and interact with the git client), and i think it fits the bill well.

i am not associated with it at all, i just want folks to know that self-hosting your own git service has really never been easier or better; there are so many good options, like a similar project, gitea.

if you are uncomfortable with exposing your home network to the internet, you can use tools like tailscale funnel or a reverse proxy server like caddy and a $5 VPS from any cloud host of your choosing to obscure your home IP, while still keeping the storage and the brains somewhere closeby.

imo, the only way forward for all of us to stay safe is to keep repeating a simple mantra: “let’s go back to making websites.”

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 146 points 6 days ago

It blows my mind that so many devs did not see this coming the moment Microsoft bought it. I was waiting for this to happen the moment I found out about the acquisition.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago

I’m only surprised it took this long.

[-] Squiddork@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

Pretty sure I had Embrace Extend Extinguish as my 'status' when microsoft inevitably introduced that linkedin style social media bullshit to a git server.

Plenty of good alternatives out there, or roll your own!

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

I fully saw it when I heard but alas. I still need the green squares on my github page to get hired. Nobody looks at projects as much as the green squares.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 216 points 6 days ago
[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 175 points 6 days ago

It was dead when MS bought it. Software developers aren't immune to denial.

[-] medem@lemmy.wtf 75 points 6 days ago

People not realising (or not caring enough about) the irony that more than 80% of open source projects are hosted in a platform which is a) not open source and b) owned by M$ has always been a mistery to me.

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

b) is a recent(*) change. GitHub was independent when it became big

a) GitHub was never open-source, but by combing git and great UI/UX, it was a good choice.

Git is open-source and the distributed nature of git reduces the vendor-lock-in. You need to understand where we came from (svn or git to some ssh server). Coming from self-hosted git, embracing github did not take away your power over your own source code; you still had a copy of all branches on multiple machines. The world is different now, where github has become a single-point of failure.

(*) Update: Okay, maybe 2018 was not recently, but my point stands. GitHub existed long before the Microsoft purchase.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

i am old in terms of internet years, and Bill Gates really is living proof that billionaires can essentially destroy the lives of thousands and thousands of people to gather their wealth, and then spend the autumn of their years choosing which countries or causes get a splash-out of the unfathomable excess, like a little kinglet.

i am happy his money helped fix stuff in the world. but that’s called “catching up to what has been expected of you for 60 years.” he does not get a cookie for working out of the Andrew Carnegie playbook.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Long live Microsoft 365 Copilot CodeShare Professional

[-] iii@mander.xyz 42 points 6 days ago

Finally we can do collaborative coding in powerpoint, put it on sharepoint, and have copilot link it to issues in teams.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phirdowak@programming.dev 171 points 6 days ago

Are we moving to Codeberg now?

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 84 points 6 days ago

Or your own server. But yeah this is not so good for the rest of us. They are doubling down on AI.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

Self hosting for your own needs is great but you won't get the "drive by" contributions you get from shared platforms. On GitHub, Gitlab, and Codeberg, if I even see as little as a typo in the readme file, I open a pull request. I will not sign up on a hundred different git hosters for stuff like that.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

So what you're saying is that we need federated git.

[-] kybean@pawb.social 31 points 6 days ago

Forgejo, the software project powering Codeberg, is working on adding federation but it's got a long way to go before it's a usable feature

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 31 points 6 days ago

There's plenty alternatives.

  • Sourcehut sr.ht (possibly other instances)
  • Various gitlab instances, e.g. framagit.org
  • not to mention git's own web ui which runs under so many domains; some of them might even be open to signups.
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] marlowe221@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago

The real question is…. WHY DOES AZURE DEVOPS STILL EXIST?!?!?

Our company runs everything on Azure. We use windows PCs, Visual Studio Professional, C# .Net, outlook, teams, etc.

We make enterprise software and I am happy really. I wasn’t at the start but as time goes on I don’t care, I do my job and go home.

[-] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 15 points 5 days ago

Username checks out :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Master167@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Because businesses that use .NET are already paying for it with their visual studio subscription or higher Microsoft support. It’s a bare minimum product that has no incentive to improve because no one pays for it. But businesses force the use of it because “we’re already paying for it”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 76 points 6 days ago

Everything M$ touches dies. What a fucking shocker.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Now if only they could work that magic on ICE and IDF. (Microsoft is in bed with both.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 68 points 6 days ago

So they're just going to use GitHub as a code training dataset? Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

load more comments (3 replies)

shit, whats this going to mean for repos like massgrave? will microsoft enforce shitty policies against DIY software that's published there if it violates somebody's terms of use?

[-] finix_the_psyker@sopuli.xyz 28 points 5 days ago

Just move to codeberg or a similar site.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

Monopolies becoming more of a monopolies while the US is weaponized to protect them.

[-] josefo@leminal.space 51 points 6 days ago

This is the most infuriating, heartbreaking and lame thing ever. AI bros are just a bunch of losers ruining stuff for everyone.

[-] lime360@kbin.earth 77 points 6 days ago

i don't think being owned by a shitty billionare company counts as independent

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 44 points 6 days ago

I believe that's probably why they specify in the headline "at Microsoft" rather than just "independent."

You can have an independent division within a company that doesn't get orders from the company's main CEO, or you can have it be fully under that person's oversight. It used to be a separate division with its own management, now it's not, thus it's no longer internally independent.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Huge différence when you have an executive team that can say no.

Now that the No guys are out, MS CoreAI team can do whatever the fuck they want.

I should have deleted my data earlier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago

Self-hosting is the future.

[-] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm just waiting for Forgejo federation to be a thing, and some sort of definitive website for discovering projects. Right now, even though I do have my slefhosted forgejo instance, I still need to keep my code on GitHub, or no-one else will ever know about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 42 points 6 days ago

and so begins the enshitification

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago
[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 35 points 6 days ago

and so the enshitification continues

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

Didn't this clown literally say like lastweek that if you're a dev and you're not using AI to get out? well...he's out and look what happens.

Move to Codeberg, donate to them, or self host your git repos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 days ago

The ensh*tification continues. Time for community git to somehow be federated like lemmy.

Some sort of encrypted collective sharing of the whole through BitTorrent style shared hosting.

I would seriously consider donating a few TB space and half my bandwidth to that.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago

Git has always been decentralized. That was one of its purposes. Sites like GitHub, Gitlab, etc actually went against the grain and centralized them; I personally believe this helped popularize git back in the days of CVS and Subversion being the two most popular version control systems.

Git patches were made to be email friendly as a means of distributing code between developers — it’s how the Linux kernel does it (or did, I’m not up to date on their current practices).

[-] Pamasich@kbin.earth 31 points 6 days ago

Time for community git to somehow be federated like lemmy.

Already being worked on for a while. It's called ForgeFed and being developed by Forgejo (the software powering codeberg). It's an extension to the ActivityPub protocol, which is also powering the fediverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] iglou@programming.dev 24 points 6 days ago

... Was it ever since they got bought?

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 days ago

So long and thanks for all the fish indeed

And, which is the real Copilot now? Fuck MS and their terrible terrible naming.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
1131 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74130 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS