79

Apparently data centers routinely burn through water at a rate of about 1.9 liters per KWh of energy spent computing. Yet I can 🎮 HARDCORE GAME 🎮 on my hundreds-of-watts GPU for several hours, without pouring any of my Mountain Dew into the computer? Even if the PC is water cooled, the water cooling water stays in the computer, except for exceptional circumstances.

Meanwhile, water comes out of my A/C unit and makes the ground around it all muddy.

How am I running circles around the water efficiency of a huge AI data center, with an overall negative water consumption?

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 days ago

It's used like sweating. We lose heat by havibg water evaporate off our skin. Right now get warm water and put it on your arm, then blow on it. It gets cold until it is fully evaporated. For water to change from the liquid to the gaseeous phase it needs energy. Think like water molecules are holding hands in a liquid. If one of them wants to come free and fly through the air it needs to somehow get the energy to break free from the grip of the others first. When water evaporates from your arm it tales this energy in the form of heat. It turns heat and uses it to get to the gaseous phase. As long as there is water on your arm it can be cooled that way.

That's what data centers do as well. They take water to cool their processors and the let part of it evaporate into the air. That way the parts of the water that remain are like your arm - the get cool quickly.

It's very effective. But if you live in a small town and next door there's a massive datacenter that takes out all the groundwater and basically just boils it until it disappears, you might get angry after a while.

[-] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 17 points 4 days ago

They use evaporative cooling for a chiller plant most likely.

[-] planish@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Why would they design around evaporative cooling when water consumption is a problem?

[-] kassiopaea 34 points 4 days ago

Because evaporative cooling is much cheaper and easier to accomplish at scale, and megacorps don't care about long-term resource constraints until it begins to affect their wallets.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

also places in red states allow for free or cheap polluting, and waste.

[-] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 18 points 4 days ago

Because it's cheap and easy.

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago

because it's cheap, easy, compact, well understood, and makes numbers look good. number in question is ratio of energy used by entire facility to energy used by silicon only (i forgor how it's called). alternative is dissipating heat from radiators, but this makes this number like 3. evaporative cooling makes this number closer to 1.2

[-] qupada@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

number in question is ratio of energy used by entire facility to energy used by silicon only (i forgor how it's called)

PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness).

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

sounds like we need to charge them more for water

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Instead, WE are paying more for water and power to subsidize them.

[-] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 5 points 4 days ago

most effective form of heat transfer

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago

it wasn't a problem before they started doing this

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Because line must go up

[-] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago

What I don't get is how the water is "consumed", it's not like it's gone right? It evaporates and then just comes back down as rain surely?

Same with water consumption of a sweater or a steak.

There probably is some good reason for measuring it like that but conceptually I don't get it.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Even though there is loads and loads of water on the planet, the amount of fresh/drinkable/usable/accessible water is tiny. This water evaporates and rains back down, but this will most likely fall over the ocean, or on land and go into the ground, or into some other unusable area/form.

Water suitable for human use is a scarce commodity and needs to be preserved. Of all the water lost to the atmosphere from server cooling systems, almost none of it can be recaptured again.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Hadley cells bring them inland does it not where it condenses and rains flowing back towards the ocean where it again evaporates and travels inland rains and goes back to the ocean.

Just cause you use water in one place doesn't mean it'll come back in the same place.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

I mean eventually yeah, but not fast enough for you to keep using it that way.

Especially now that air holds more moisture since rising temperatures keep the atmosphere warmer and rain is less frequent.

[-] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 5 points 3 days ago

This is the complicated part with water consumption, saving water in the Netherlands won't make rain in Morroco.

However, there is only so many rain water stored in the ground at a given time and brought by the rivers. This water need to be used mostly for agriculture, then human consumption, and finally industry. Once it's back in the cloud we don't fully know where it will fall again, let alone if it's polluted.

Sure it's a renewable ressource, the problem start when you the water faster than the rate at which it renews, especially during summer. In Europe the problem will be even worse with the global warming. The alpine glacier are disappearing meaning that we'll loose a major water reserve for summer

[-] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Most people are not directly collecting rain to drink.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To add to what others said, it’s a tradeoff.

Your gaming PC not only runs up your electric bill from the wall, but the AC as well. It has to work to get all that heat out.

This is the equivalent of water cooling your PC, and piping it to a hot tub outside. It would heat it and evaporate water faster, but it’s basically free and uses basically no electricity.

That’s the tradeoff. It’s water evaporation instead of heat pumps. It’s trading water usage for lots of electricity usage, which in some cases, is well worth it.

And what if you live in a cold climate, you say? Well, evaporative cooling is most cost efficient in hot and (ironically) dry climates.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Server farms use water to cool computers, it's like water called computers but on a bigger scale

Aircons condense water from the atmosphere the same way water on your shower mirror happens because the mirror is colder than the fog

If you're familiar with condensation and the rain cycle it should help you understand further

[-] Thoath@leminal.space 3 points 4 days ago

taps the fact that electricity is a steam reaction and even if you don't see it, the electricity you're using is made by decompressing water into vapor, whether by burning coal through turbines/boiled wind from water sources creating wind power/ even nuclear reactors are often a boiling water reaction going through turbines, creating a net loss of 'water' if we don't have natural condensation utilities to convert 'air'

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

that water usually goes through a heat exchanger in a closed loop. there's a reason most power plants are built by lakes.

also, explain "boiled wind"?

[-] Thoath@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If it's truly a closed loop, why do you need a lake, a true closed loop has zero need for local water sources, else there's some sort of negative that they're compensating for which, in case of local water sources, there's not enough infrastructure if any of that water OR HEAT leaves the system faster than it enters

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago

to be the other end of the heat exchanger?

[-] Thoath@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago

Water exchange above large bodies of water causes thermal dynamic exchanges deliberating speeds of wind currents

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago

that's not really a big factor.

[-] Thoath@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah because you've measured the water intake and export of every large body of water I forgot you're obviously an expert who knows how to read when a data center takes more water than a town, love your stern optimism, maybe like, wander off somewhere else so you feel important in your views, because it ain't with me here bud

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 3 days ago

no, you obviously don't want people to talk to you. that's fair.

[-] Thoath@leminal.space 1 points 4 days ago

The water is for sure going up there with help, it won't come back down without help in equal measure, it's dynamics are completely spun out

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out that they're destroying the environment on purpose for some nefarious purpose. e.g. maybe they think it's easier to rule the masses if natural ressources are very scarce.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I think it's more likely that yellow journalism is making an issue out of something that isn't as big a deal as it is.

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

Since when does yellow journalism care about the environment?

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When haven't they?

Fear and anger sell.

This AI shit is the leftist version of "illegal immigrants are stealing yur jobs"

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

To be fair, the “infinite scaling” vision Altman and such are selling is quite a dystopia. And they are the ones pushing it.

It’s not reality at all. But it’s kinda reasonable for people to hate that specifically.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Isn't everything infinitely scaling?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No.

The path I see forward for ML is small, task specific models running on your smartphone or PC, with some kind of bitnet architecture so it uses basically no power.

That’s the hope, anyway, but all the pieces already exist. Bitnet works, extreme task specific training works with a paper that just came out, NPU frameworks are starting to come together.

If that sounds incompatible with corporate AI, that’s because it is.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42746 readers
330 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS