443
Applied retroactively and recursively, it would strip citizenship from effectively all Americans
That’s the point. They have a weapon that can be used against anyone, and it’s already shown they don’t care about due process. The courts gave him everything he needs.
I think this is a great point. If they dispute the immigration status of your great grandpappy, oh looks like you're an illegal based on this purely unconstitutional "inherited status" doctrine.
Edit: The 14th amendment specifically mentions "born" in the US to prevent the use of the law to do things like this aimed at former slaves. Its no surprise that this kind of thing is being attempted by maga nazis.
It's going to suck to have to carry in depth genealogical records everywhere
Right?
I'm wondering if there's a way I can use this to get deported to the lands of my great great great great grandparents (Germany or the Netherlands or somewhere idk)
They wouldn't take my stupid ass otherwise
No they’ll send you to CECOT or just make you stateless and dump you somewhere random with nothing
Nah, they'll send you to CECOT or fucking South Sudan in stead
Don't worry they're already floating the idea of slavery so illegals can work farms
My DNA is such a fucking mashup that I could theoretically go to almost any European country.
Take me back.
Well, do you have any marketable skills?
I’m an HVAC technician with 5 years of experience in commercial refrigeration.
You know someone that would sponsor an immigrant?
Me personally, no.
But honestly with how on fire the world currently is, a lot of places will be in need of air con soon that didn't before, if your skills also transfer to heat pumps I think you can take your pick of where you'd like to go. Just start sending applications. Also if you have any European ancestors, check if that country doesn't grant descended citizenship (like ireland, greece, italy etc).
I'm wondering about this also except my lawful parents have been here only about 30 years. I don't know if their legal status when I was born is 'legal enough' for me to remain even when birthright was perfectly intact at the time. I'd probably have three options of countries to go to. But only if they will accept 'stateless U.S. citizens' is another matter because the Global North is gungho about anti-immigration and that includes asylum.
How will this impact the people in the Epstein Files?
Donald J Trump
All Republicans
Half of Democrats
Wow. I Didn't Know That. You're Telling Me Now for the First Time
That is a great question. Thanks for bringing it up.
This
Does this include Marco Rubio, whose grandfather was an illegal immigrant?
Or Trump's wife who he bought from Epstein?
Wouldn't this mean that Trump's father who's parents were German and his mother who was born in Scotland weren't citizens when he was born on American soil, hence he himself isn't?
Of course they will never let it apply to themselves.
Fascist regimes delight in and depend on arbitrary enforcement of rules.
So, recursively and retroactively. So who is a citizen then? People who pay the $5m? People who are naturalized? Party loyalists? Does servitude guarantee citizenship? I would like to know more.
The more of these boxes you can check, the “safer” you are….
White.
Wealthy.
Straight.
Male.
Christian.
And well-connected and have rightthink. Those are more important than the others. You can check all your boxes, but too much wrongthink and you'll be against the wall before you know what's happening.
Party > Wealth > orientation > race/gender > religion (Just keep it quiet.)
Not even service guarantees citizenship as multiple veterans have been deported
service hasn't guaranteed citizenship since Trump scrapped the program in his first term
It's not a nation anymore it is more a club. Do they have membership discounts? /s
I'm doing my part!
Fucking fascists. We should still be accepting immigrants through Ellis Island (in my humble opinion)
No! Don't be humble about that, that's just simply how this country was founded.. and I don't mean the exploiters, I mean the countless immigrants who form the working class since then. That is more than something to take pride in.
I had a little "debate" where it was being argued the US was never a melting pot, and if it was ever, it isn't anymore. How defeatist is that? To let the undeniable presence of so many cultures wither just as these ethnonationalists intend.. You have to be bold, else you lose what you once had, or worse, never achieve anything greater.
To that end, USCIS declared flatly that the children of immigrants who are “unlawfully present” will “no longer be U.S. citizens at birth.” They will, instead, inherit the status of their parents, rendering them detainable and deportable as infants and throughout their lives. There is no indication that the government will provide some grace period before snatching up and imprisoning this new underclass of noncitizen babies; they are apparently subject to arrest from the moment of birth.
it’s not much of a stretch to assume they’ll do the same to people born here three generations down. or six. or twenty.
fucking pieces of garbage worthless nazis these admins and anyone who supports them are.
Yeah that's smart, expel themselves
if we’re lucky they’ll follow their leader.
load more comments
(3 replies)
@xylol Is one of those who brought it up.
One of the steps that will lead to mass corporate slavery.
"Former" Americans will be bought and sold, or "disposed of", to pay off their "debt" for being allowed to stay on American soil.
Isn't birthright citizenship a human right or UN right or something?
The world is pretty divided in giving citizenship based on the person's parents or on place of birth: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_sanguinis
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
443 points (100.0% liked)
News
32565 readers
2708 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS