628

The intrigue: The "Rule of Five" law allows any five members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to request federal agencies to provide information about "any matter within the jurisdiction of the committee."

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 204 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Going nowhere in 3... 2...

Schumer said the files could be released with redactions because keeping the information of the victims private "must be of top importance."

Sure, keep the victims private, but don't give them free license to redact shit.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 97 points 2 weeks ago

The list is released with all names redacted. Because the right would consider anyone on the list as a victim, even those who committed crimes.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is obviously the answer to why the victim count went up and the perpetrator count went down to 2, soon to be 1. They're interpreting Trump as a victim and trying to figure out how to argue that he is a victim, but Clinton isn't to throw meat to the wolves.

There are not 1000s of women at a brothel, but there may be 1000s of johns.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago

And Democrats will fall for it again. They'll go after Clinton, because that is the high road. Everyone on the list needs to be brought to whatever justice is due.

Just like the Panama papers... sigh.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

There's actually been a guy to go to prison over the Panama Papers. Sorry, he went to jail over paying to have a journalist murdered.

They still haven't had the trial yet, but the jackass spent 6 years in jail before they granted him bail.

His henchmen in the murder are all some form of sentence with one of them having turned state's witness.

The coverup is often worse than the crime. I say often because Trump is try to cover up an extremely serious crime. Or rather a bunch of them.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ding ding ding. Nixon tapes pt 2 pedophile boogaloo

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

We wouldn't want to hurt their reputation, would we/s

[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Good news they'll just use black highlight instead of actually redacting anything.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 2 weeks ago

Seeing at how incompetent DOGE was. This is totally plausible.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 weeks ago

Trumpie truly does surround himself with the best.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not 100% sure he means from their redactions? I think the law only allows senators access to the files, so he might be meaning senators / senator staff releasing it after getting it then redacting victim names?

In either case, doing this still keeps it in the news which hurts Trump. Senate Dems can and should keep doing everything like this instead of Schumer's previous strategy of stuff like caving on the CR for no reason. This is notable improvement from senate dems even compared to recently

Especially because house dems have shown more fight. They were far more aggressive in trying to force votes on releasing the files which lead to Republicans just shutting down the house instead of voting on it. Which both works to show Republicans are complicit and stops them from pushing through worse bills for an extra few weeks. Senate dems tried a couple of unanimous consent votes, but didn't see it quite to the level of house dems forcing amendment votes in every committee on damn near everything

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

What he means vs. what he said. The GOP can twist it so that they follow the letter of his words, not the spirit of his intent.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Schumer's on the list.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I’m imagining a ridiculous scenario where the victims get protection and their names are accidentally outed in the Epstein files. Imagine all the Trumpers going off to threaten these victims and being shot dead for it. Solves so many problems all at once.

Sigh.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What's the plan if the files contain damming evidence against Trump? Will he be impeached? Will he be arrested like anybody else? Will there just be no consequences whatsoever? What is the protocol when the president is revealed to have committed heinous crimes? I want to know NOW!

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yea, he will definitely be impeached for the third time. One more impeachment and he'll get a Writ of Reprimand. 4 of those and a Supreme Court judge literally slaps him on the wrist. That'll show him.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Will they slap him with this?

[-] turdburglar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

no, those were recalled for slicing up people’s wrists

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

If someone slapped me with that I'd prefer it sliced my wrists. I don't want to live knowing I've worn one.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's what happens when more than 33 senators are willing to stand by the president no matter what they do I suppose. When it came to honor/shame, no one ever thought someone so wretched wouldn't just be forcibly removed by the people around them.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

33 lmao, judging by the senate confirmation votes, there's at least 50.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

33+ is the requirement to not be removed when impeached. At that point we can basically stop counting

57 voted he was guilty on the last one (the insurrection)

[-] askryan@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago

They would 100% never let files with Trump's name in it out. This is going to absolutely backfire on the Democrats when the Republicans inevitably release a doctored list with all their political enemies on it. This is so much better for the Dems when the files are a big MacGuffin. Even if by some miracle they did release the actual list and Trump was on it, they would say it was a witch hunt by the corrupt Biden administration and MAGA would eat it up. There will never be legal consequences for any of them, ever. If they ever do get consequences it will be because of some brave Luigi.

[-] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

An immediate admission of an active alien invasion and the activation of the new patriot II act.

[-] NotForYourStereo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Weird how they want it released now, but didn't do shit about it under Biden...

Almost like it's all theatrics for them.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

The finance committee requested the files, got them, wrote up subpoenas based on those files and were blocked by republiQans.

All under Biden. Still ready to go, just get the GQP to do anything at all.

[-] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Too little was done out of fear Trump would capitalize on it.

And look how that turned out.

[-] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

what are you talking about?

[-] Gerblat@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

They’re saying that the Biden administration didn’t want to release the info and stir the pot. They were afraid that the ~~fascists~~ republicans would do something shitty in retaliation.

Which of course, the GOP was always gonna do anyway, because they have always tried to get away with whatever they could. So now we get the fallout without the payoff of actually getting the files released

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It will never get released. The Democrats get to act like they want to release it while the Republicans are blocking it now. This is very bad theater.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I can imagine it like a scene in a sitcom. They are both yanking on the documents in a tug of war in front of an audience of citizens. Only for someone to slip and the documents fly into the air and rain down on the citizens by accident, fucking them both over.

We can only hope.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. What would make that sitcom even better is if it ended with a surprise guillotine

[-] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why would they release the files when it could put active investigations at risk? John Q Public doesn't need to know who's name is on the list if the justice department is doing it's job properly. Now that it's not we might as well know how trump prefers 14yo's that look like his daughter.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

lol 14 status-quo democrats downvoted the truth

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's weird that the Senate had a special centuries old rule requiring everyone produce at least once piece of child pornography before a vote can continue, but I guess the 1830s was just a different time.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Someone posted this up on here a couple of weeks ago. I'll do my part to repost it:

From reddit… https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/s/eBjDX0zt07

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80

Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac

—————————other Epstein Information

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson/_TrumpEpstein/_Calif/_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.

Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

No fucking way

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Dude, now do UAP.

(By the way, I’m basically quoting Chuck here. He said the same in a tweet earlier this year. Fucking ineffectual clown.)

[-] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fuck yes, man! We cannot let up here. Okay, call me looney, because I totally am and rather manic right now. I been digging into this shit. The "Epstein Sex Scandal" was a honeypot operation. Hear me out. So we can't tell which fucking way is up, because we are under a multi-prong attack. The 2016 Russian interference investigation showed misinformation campaigning (i.e. psychological warfare). The DEA confirmed that fentanyl precursors are mostly Chinese. The Opium Wars clearly show that China knows a thing or two about narcotic warfare. I've spent a lot of time with theoretical physics - I even have a TOE formalized, and I'm working on my 1D relativistic simulator. I think it's clear that certain sciences have been stunted, but I have no links for that. Maxwell's father worked for several intelligence agencies, including the Mossad. The Sex trafficking originated in Soviet Russia as a child-run child-prostitution ring, in response to famine. Intelligence agencies link to the DARE program, amplifying the effect of narcotic warfare. Our "special relationship" with Israel is a perfect strategic position to fight the oil wars, beating up on Iran with protecting Jerusalem providing a cover story. Israel is buddies with everyone and all of these intelligence communities work together. Our pact with Israel is the heart of the war machine. Add the financial sector in with its private, debt-based currency, and you get a picture of the deep state war machine. But, look at motivation. Look at the nature of the Epstein honeypot. Could have been personal blackmail, threats to family, whatever to get leverage over these powerful people. But, no. They went for the desecration of the innocent on an industrial scale. We're not hunting pedophiles. We are hunting the apocalypse cult, and we found their fucking temple.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

Dude, ease up on the narcotics my man.

Yeah we found their temple. Their pedophile temple. Because they're pedophiles. Yes evangelicals are often accelerationists, because they want Jesus to hurry up so they can get raptured or whatever.

Things generally have simple explanations. No need to connect things that aren't connected.

[-] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not narcotics. Just bipolar. And yeah, I get ahead of myself. Thank you.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
628 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25260 readers
1832 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS