293
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 81 points 1 year ago

“Do you know who I am?” has to be the saddest flex there is.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"We know, and you should be the example of the people you claim to represent. Shame on you." is the correct response.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Poor her, she had finally found 2 babysitters. One for her children and one for her children's children.

[-] demonquark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Her behavior fits what I would expect of the people who voted for her.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

yeah, my whole premise is flawed because she probably is the perfect example of the people who voted for her...

[-] starbreaker@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This asshole's problem isn't that people don't know who she is.

Her problem is that too many people do, and aren't as impressed with her as she is with herself.

I wish Larry Flynt were still around. I bet he'd do a parody porno targeting this asshole and MTG that would make Who's Nailin' Paylin?0 seem as tame as Howard Stern's old broadcast TV show.

[-] remus989@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Alright, I'm gonna need you to cast this porno parody. For science...

[-] starbreaker@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There aren't any performers I hate enough to cast in this. They'd be likely to get shot by LB and MTG's fans.

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

No amount of health-risk sharing is able to get me to think twice about quitting vaping, this shit tho.. wow I might actually quit so I don't get grouped up with this twat.

[-] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Vape cause u like it, not cause how it makes u look

[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meh. Switch to weed instead and don't vape distillate/vegetable glycerine. More fun and less hazardous to your health, imo.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Then you've got nothing to worry about. Keep on chiefing.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

In the lobby, the report said they were told to leave the property and they said, “do you know who I am, “I am on the board” and “I will be contacting the mayor.”

They were escorted out of the building with security and DPD.

I love those two sentences back to back.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

"Do you know who I am?!"

"oh sorry senator, let me fix this for you." starts playing clown music as they continue to escort her out. "ahhhh much better."

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love her wagging her finger at the usher at 2:07. Those who voted her in twice should be embarrassed, but who am I kidding, their hatred of "the other" is way stronger than embarrassment could ever be.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Fascinating. I’ve never seen a bag of trash take a selfie.

[-] foiledAgain@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago
[-] threeduck@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago
[-] foiledAgain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Do what the kid said

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Lol. “Escorted”

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Mad karen energy right here.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Boebert escorted out of 'Beetlejuice' show

Ah yes, the obnoxious ghoul.

[-] Doolbs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

She needs to go back to being an escort. Do something she might be good at.

[-] starbreaker@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't fuck her with Zeus' dick.

[-] Theskyisgrey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Where did this whole thing about her once being an escort come from? Are people just saying that because of the way she looks?

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

This would be right at home on this old twitter account I used to follow before Musk's takeover "crazy moments in american politics" or something.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Even detesting Boebert's politics as I do, this is nothing that would cause me to think differently about her.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

First thing my wife said when I told her about this was, "Was she vaping weed?"

[-] vind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

anyone have a mirror?

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

C U Next Thursday

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Anyone have a non-paywall link to the video?

I run the NoScript addon. It's not something most people would want to leave enabled all the time (because it's a PITA) but it disables many paywalls.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
293 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18917 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS