773
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 122 points 1 year ago

If you leak sensitive military documents just because you can't stand losing an online argument, your voting rights and driving licence should be revoked. You are simply too stupid to exist in normal society.

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

Treating people as sub-human - no longer with the same basic human rights, like the right to vote, as others - just for committing a crime, is an extremely dangerous fascist road to go down.

Criminals exist, they are people, and they have as much right to take part in the democratic process as anybody else. Equality is the cornerstone of democracy.

[-] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

The only exception I would make to this is cases of electoral fraud. If you are part of an attempt to manipulate the votes you should lose the right to vote.

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Some countries other than the USA that have criminal disenfranchisement laws have them ONLY for crimes targeting the state/democratic order. As of 2012, Germany, Norway and Portugal are doing this. Though most countries just let their criminals vote.

[-] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Didn't they voluntarily give up their equality when they committed a crime? If they didn't give that up by their actions, then they couldn't be locked up at all. Violent crime could then potentially only be punished by a stern warning or a fine. Why are felons not allowed to own firearms in the US?

[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

No, they did not. They aren't suddenly inhuman because of a crime. Crime is the effect not a cause. The fact is, it is well known that something as simple as a temperature increase leads to more crime. The taking away of rights for felons after they have done their time says that the government doesn't believe in Rehabilitation of criminals which is the reason prison was created instead of just killing them. The fact is that because felons lost the right to vote and such, the conditions they are in have become deplorable with no way to rectify it because assholes like you that have never seen the inside of a prison have more control over its condition than someone that was there for 10-20 years

[-] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ok, I don't mind being called a fascist, but I'll be danged if I'm an asshole. I identify as a lady woman and therefore, should be referred to as a cunt. You're jumping about and making an argument from emotion. You're moving too fast to explain my views to me. Explain my views, again? Bringing up Putin was a asinine and humorous attempt to stay somewhere near the thread topic , but I can see those days are past. Let's both take a deep breath. If we don't talk about Putin or F-117s, we're both going to be warned by the mods that we are BOTH acting like cunts. They're pretty tolerant of tangents, but not that tolerant.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Everyone has an asshole, it's a gender neutral term

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wait, when people call others body parts, some people are reducing that other person to just that part and don't mean it metaphorically? Does everyone else know that there's these two ways of interpreting those insults? Why wasn't I taught this in school?

It makes the interpretation of some of those as sexist make some sense, though I've always seen each of them going along with a vague set of behaviors/traits.

Like a dick is aggressively cocky.

A pussy is a coward.

An asshole makes things shitty.

A cunt is an aggressive asshole that goes out of their way to ruin things.

An ass makes a fool of themselves.

A bitch makes their problems everyone else's problem. Not a body part, I know, but another one that gets called sexist.

I've always seen all of these as something someone of either gender can be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

With that logic the fact that the government has criminalized an act makes everyone who does it "sub-human" or "voluntarily given up their equality to other people"?

I'm not sure that's a good road to go down. You don't give up anything when you commit a crime. The reason we can imprison/punish criminals is that the social contract includes being subject to the outcome of a fair trial.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

By the way, no one here is arguing that criminals aren't people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I agree with you. Did you know that criminal disenfranchisement is not an invention of the USA? We turned it into an artform, to be sure, but it has a long history and is still a thing in many other countries (old article, couldn't find anything more recent easily).

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

You're right. Instead, we should form suicide squads with them and send them to Ukraine to fight imperialism

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

No no you don't understand

They leak online documents because its usually Gaijin's braindead mods rambling about superior russian technology that gets implemented as invincible in game lol.

Also pretty much all these leaks are considered sensitive info, not top secret. It's not common on the internet, but really easy for many people in the military to access because its usually basic things like a flight manual.

Not to mention its also mostly retired or previous generation tech, so this material is probably coming from off service members anyway.

Hell even the China MBT "leak" wasn't illegal because it was already declassified.

It's not my fault that people are wrong on the internet

[-] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Voting rights should only be impacted in cases of electoral fraud. If you are part of a widespread campaign to illegally impact the vote then and only then should you lose voting rights

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 81 points 1 year ago
[-] Skua@kbin.social 102 points 1 year ago

Engine and sensor specs for the F-117

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 1 year ago

When I was in the Navy, during the mid 90's, I watched these things take off and do training tests or whatever they did. We watched them for hours. It occurred to me, watching them in perfect daylight and with a understanding of what I was watching, that if I didn't know what that was it could have easily been a UFO. And ever since then when someone tells me that they might have seen a UFO I tell them about watching that airplane and how UFO it looked taking off and doing maneuvers. Its shape and speed make it such a bizarre thing to see.

[-] 100@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I saw some jet in 2010 at an airshow in Spangdahlem, pretty sure it was an F-22, transition from flying normally to what can only be described as standing on it's engines and flying through the air, horizontally, belly first. Evidently this was easy enough to be performed directly over the base at a very low altitude. Mindblowing.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

"Easy enough"... but wasn't there a case where a pilot lost control doing that stunt, and the plane turned into a fireball just off-base?

[-] konalt@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago
[-] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

This is teaching and maintaining standards of NCD leadership, rightchyah

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

wasn't that retired from combat in 2008? I get that the technology might still be classified, but by modern stealth, it's ancient

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It was ITAR restricted and not sensitive. Every time I see this I just shake my head..

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's what I thought. It's been 8+ years since I had to do anything ITAR so I couldn't remember if it also applied to information. From what I remember it explicitly controls products that are purpose built or components of defense systems (and by that I mean 'Arms').

While I'm sure Warthunder thought the best idea was to say "fuck that, we aren't touching this live wire with a 20 foot long insulated fiber glass pole" and the manual itself is export controlled (as it aids in use of the F-117 system) there isn't a new national security threat because of it being shared publicly. Part of the reason ITAR exists, if you make it difficult or impossible to obtain all the parts of a system, that system is going to have a hard time working correctly.

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

NATO sells the docs online lmao

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Does anyone happen to have the specific persons handbook on how to operate a m1 Abrams?

[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

WHY ARE THEYRE SIX PEDALS!

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

If there are only four directions

[-] wasabi@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago
[-] vaalla@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 year ago

F-117 documents were leaked on War Thunder forums this week i think.

[-] PinkOwls@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a life-long fan of the F-117 (I played the F-19 and F-117 games by Microprose), was there anything of interest in those documents? Asking for a friend.

It's another flight manual like the Eurofighter DA.7 last week (iirc).

[-] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Oh man, you played too? There's dozens of us!

I remember having to learn how to use DOS commands to load the cd and start the game.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

So many times over the years. The devs had made multiple public statements that they will not use the information or implement it in game, so as not to encourage it, yet people keep doing it

[-] SiffaGroove 12 points 1 year ago

The information being used in the game is FAR less important than being right on a Internet forum, apparently

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

This time its not even to win an argument the comment is just "here's the flight manual, please implement the plane"

Which is even worse than what you'd think because the plane looks very cool but its purpose is nowhere near the type of gameplay that war thunder has.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tristar@lemmyfly.org 25 points 1 year ago

Classified information or $10 manual again?

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Other people have said it's a ten dollar manual but I never checked the sources 🤷

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/the-war-thunder-forum-has-once-again-been-used-to-share-restricted-plane-documentation-this-time-about-the-f-117-nighthawk/ar-AA1gAVs9

the user allegedly posted pages from a flight manual, which included information such as the location of the plane’s sensors, its engine specifications, and even its firing angles.

Probably nothing new to the people who would target an F-117 but still

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Such a strange time to be alive

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
773 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3493 readers
3 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS