186
White racists only for the new and improved Murica!
remember the afrikaans he imported over, they were abandoned as soon as they landed on us soil.
Im pretty certain that the civil rights act prevents them from only offering it to white people, as coincidentally the 1960s was when our racist and eugenics based immigration system from the early twentieth century was finally overturned
They don't only offer it to white people, they offer it to people who fall under a specific combination of criteria that happens to coincidentally exclude all but white people.
You think legislation is going to stop them? It hasn’t yet. Buckle up
It is cute that some people still think the US is a nation of laws!
Pretty sure that program is no longer in place after Musk got shafted.
Oh but it is. As is all the other things that benefit Musk. Because his departure is theater. There's a reason none of his contracts have been canceled. There's a reason he just got a huge fat new contract a few weeks ago.
Why do well more than half the news links in this community have pay walls?
This also has a paywall 🙃
I see the whole article?
Then there is your answer:
You see the whole article, others don't. Publishers sometimes decide by your IP, your location etc. if you are allowed to read it freely (also putting rate limits up, so if enough people in your vicinity already saw it you will hit the paywall reasoning that you are already interested and more willing to pay). Or they simply put up the paywall later based on how popular an article is.
Or in short: a lot of new links have paywalls because the people posting something didn't even know there was one.
PS: many people regularly clicking news from all over the world also often have addons, plugins and filters running that circumvent a lot of those paywalls automatically, so we sometimes tend to forget about them...
Fair enough.
I believe that saying you are explicitly providing a way to get around a paywall is technically against the rules of this community or instance because the mods/admins don't want to be taken down for copyright stuff
However, if the above article doesn't seem to be loading correctly for you for some mysterious reason (e.g. who knows, perhaps there's some networking problem or a server outage somewhere), then it's perfectly fine for me to offer you an archive mirror to help you workaround this purely technical issue - https://archive.is/s0EUX
Weird since they were only focused on taking white farm owners land. So when did diversity become part of the conversation?
White farm owners who's families y'know, showed up, killed the natives, and took the land for themselves.
So early 1900’s the land was stolen. Then farmers produced product for locals and possible exports. Then said okay we are taking your land without compensation because your great grand parents stole this land?
So I'm curious about something. At what point is something that is stolen become not stolen?
Crime has existed for as long as man has walked earth. Some things are stolen and never get returned. This is a strange concept. Due to early 1900s your great ancestors stealing land. We are stealing the land back from you without giving you compensation.
They are doing the exact action that happened over 100 years ago. So nothing was learned?
Ok, but that didn't answer my question. I'm thinking of going on a crime spree and stealing a bunch of things. When is it no longer considered stolen?
Until the government steals it back apparently.
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
186 points (100.0% liked)
News
31269 readers
2617 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS