652
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 40 points 6 days ago
[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

South Park already showed Saddam Hussein’s penis in all its glory.

Think about it:

  • Saddam? Exposed.
  • Trump? Censored.

This is TOTAL DISCRIMINATION

The point is FAIRNESS. If one guy’s junk gets airtime, then THE DONALD’S deserves a prime-time show!

This isn’t just TV—it’s about AMERICAN VALUES.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

That was a movie, though. There are different standards on cable.

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

There are standards on cable?

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

They're largely self imposed. But yeah. For instance breaking bad a limit of 3 "fuck"smper season and sometimes they're still bleeped depending on what time of day you're watching it

[-] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Not if your studio can afford the fees

[-] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 169 points 1 week ago

Here are all of the Epstein Files that have either been leaked or released.

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80

Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac

Here's the flight logs https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165424-epstein-flight-logs-released-in-usa-vs-maxwell/

—————————other Epstein Information

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.

Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo

Epstein’s Ex Says He Boasted About Being a Mossad Agent https://share.google/jLMGahKlCzfV1RHZq Epstein and Israel both hired lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who says he's building 'legal dream team' to defend Israel in court and on internationally | The Times of Israel https://share.google/Lb9hDOduBWG4Elpid

Epstein Docs: https://ia600705.us.archive.org/21/items/epsteindocs/

Epstein Bribes/Payments: 1 BILLION+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7IrEi-ybzs

—————————other Trump information:

Here's trump admitting to peeping on 14-15 year old girls at around 1:40 on the Howard Stern Radio Show: https://youtu.be/iFaQL_kv_QY

Trump's promise to his daughter: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-dating-promise_n_57ee98cbe4b024a52d2ead02 “I have a deal with her. She’s 17 and doing great ― Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her,” Trump said. “So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited.”

Trump's modeling agency was probably part of Jeffreys pipeline: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/donald-trump-model-management-illegal-immigration/

A good summary of Trump-Epstein timeline: https://thepresidential.medium.com/we-have-been-gaslit-about-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-for-four-years-fbda67c20f75

• ⁠Much of this info can also be found on: https://theepsteindocs.com/

Feel free to do your part and spread this info around so it is never “lost”.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I will never not upvote this wherever I see it on Lemmy. Godspeed.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Wtf is that list, the white pages? So many numbers

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 148 points 1 week ago

If only our elected leaders had the balls of these comedy writers

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 96 points 1 week ago

Clearly it’s “child sized”

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Ooph, that is both an incredibly subtle but also amazingly scathing burn. Some real murdered by words content there. I love how this works in multiple contexts at once.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 83 points 1 week ago

You Democrats are SO DISGUSTING people PENISES on TV!

-People calling Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell HEROES!

[-] BossDj@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago

Also from the article:

Earlier on Thursday, the FCC approved Skydance’s acquisition of Paramount Global, clearing the way for that merger after Skydance agreed to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and install a watchdog over CBS News. That was on top of the $16 million Paramount paid Trump over the CBS News lawsuit, and the additional $16 million that Trump has said Skydance agreed to pay via those “public service announcements.”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago

This was the best part of my week, other than that miso wild rice soup I made. I also got to try my 🏴‍☠️ 🎩 back on.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

I also got to try my 🏴‍☠️ 🎩 back on.

It’s higher moral ground than giving money to Paramount

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago

Yup. The creators just made a $1.5 billion deal for streaming rights. I wouldn't worry about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] quinkin@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

Pixelating it would have made it bigger...

[-] bigbabybilly@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Good news: they didn’t show a penis. It’s animation. None of it is real.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s gonna be a long list on what they sue them for, snicker. It’s baaaaad.

[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago

You can watch the end of the episode on HeTrumpedUs.com, I don't think the article gives it enough credit for the thing they pulled.

I would have never guessed they get this aired, they are really not giving any fucks.

[-] Barberserk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I will admit they give no fucks when they criticise Israel's genocide. Until then, they are playing it safe. Trump doesn't care what the left says about him, this won't reach enough of his voting base to matter. They control their narrative.

[-] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I forsee a "school shootings" style acknowledgement where throughout the season they will just have a constant stream of children being bombed in the background while the episodes are going and finally do an episode where someone is actually acknowledging the genocide and thinks they're overreacting about it because nobody else cares about the children being exploded in town

[-] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Good. Free speech has no meaning unless actually put into practice.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Relax, guy!

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

I wonder if every episode will just be shitting on Trump?

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

It would be nice if they hit Schumer and the rest of the useless, elderly democrats too. If there ever is another free and fair election, the democrats aren't going to win if they're represented by spineless, status quo reps who never want to try anything new, and insist on playing by the rules. So, a little humiliation would be good to encourage people to primary them.

[-] AlecSadler 30 points 1 week ago

I kind of hope so. Just grind his gears and chip away at his fragile fucking ego.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago

I doubt it, they set up a bunch of storylines. The episode is barely about Trump, most of it is how we're responding to this new reality

Parker and Stone have always been counter culture centrists... But from global warming to increasingly obvious political shifts, they just had nothing to say and seemed to realize maybe they're not as smart as they thought

They didn't talk about Trump 45 or MAGA much because they want to cynically sit back and make fun of wokeness and caricature bigots. They want Cartman to be a source of shock value, and they want Stan to be their honest take of an honest person trying their best to make sense of the world

But now people are identifying with Cartman openly. The episode was not subtle about that. Things have gotten out of control... Stan's arc was about Jesus being forced down his throat, he doesn't really have a problem with Jesus, he's just really weirded out.

The Trump bait was supposedly added late in production based on Paramount firing Colbert, they signed a $1.5 billion deal with paramount two days before airing and they want to blow up the merger. They didn't like how skydance leadership was already pressuring them, and they don't like the idea of censorship in general... That all was a fuck you, I dare you to cancel us now that real money is on the line

Trump will definitely be a backdrop, but they've finally found something they want to say. And there's just not much to say about Trump...What, are you going to call him a pedo? Are you going to say he smells? Are you going to say he's cheating at golf while his handlers do an ethnic cleansing?

There's just no room for satire with Trump, and I don't think they can bait a reaction much harder than they did this episode

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

So far the only thing they haven't been allowed to show is an image of the prophet Muhammad.

[-] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 41 points 1 week ago

They did that in "super best friends"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

What even ARE the products in these ads??? (Clicking just sends me to Temu)

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Why are you using a Lemmy client with ads?

Take this, it's open source and platform agnostic https://getvoyager.app/

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

What the fuck is an ad doing in open source software?

[-] eRac@lemmings.world 10 points 6 days ago

Why are you getting adds on Lemmy?!

1/3 appears to be an eyeliner stencil. 4 and 6 are clothing. 5 is glass orbs full of low-freezing-point liquid so they stay liquid in a freezer but have high thermal mass. They are used in some woowoo skincare routines to cool skin.

2 is very weird. It's an index finger that appears to be covered in glitter and tiny orbs.

[-] Localhorst86@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why are you getting ads on Lemmy

Because they are using a client that injects ads into its feed.

I believe Boost does that

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I have the opinion that the asshole who chose the images, intentionally chose 6 even if it's "unrelated" because it has a X and at a first glance people might click it thinking it's a button to close the ad

And they cropped the finger to make it look an erect penis, to get clicks

[-] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

2 looks like a finger with a "fresh" tattoo to me. That's what they look like immediately after they are done. Kind of swollen, and they are usually covered something. Probably to make sure it heals properly. I'm not an expert though.

[-] eRac@lemmings.world 3 points 6 days ago

It did to me too until I zoomed in.

My wife thinks it is beads using a finger for scale. The glitter effect on the finger is likely fresh adhesive sticking them there.

[-] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Yall mfs got ads on your lemmy?

[-] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Left to right:

  1. Eyeliner/False lash glue stencil
  2. Rhinestones for eyelash decoration
  3. Same as #1
  4. Fake high-quality (as in low quality designed to look high quality) sweater/pant combo
  5. I think these are some kind of facial serum, or health/mana potion minis. Either way do not consume, and probs don't spread it on your skin
  6. A hoodie
[-] SCmSTR 13 points 1 week ago

It's so teeny tiny though, it should be fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
652 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25046 readers
1847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS