77
submitted 2 days ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/sigh_fi@quokk.au
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 2 days ago

So, what does that make Quark? Quark from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

[-] Rawrosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Space Gollum.

I know very little about Star Trek. That was just the first thought that popped into my head.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I've always liked the definition that in SF, the rules are set by physics, and in fantasy the rules are set by the author.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's not quite right. In sci fi there are rules that remain logically consistent, based on known physics or not. In fantasy, they can make up the rules as they go along.

Compare Star Trek and Star Wars. Trek's subspace field theory is not any kind of known physics, but Trek is still sci fi. Because the subspace fields are fairly consistent about what they do. Star Wars' fan base damn near revolted when the series hinted that The Force might not be purely mystical.

Sci fi doesn't have to explain what the rules are to the reader. They just have to be be discoverable using the scientific method. Dragonriders of Pern is hard science fiction, originally published in Analog.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Stop pretending they didn't make shit up constantly in Star Trek

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think of scifi as being fantasy + explanation. Not necessarily a good explanation, but AN explanation.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Sigh-Fi

327 readers
435 users here now

A generalist Sci-Fi meme community.

founded 4 days ago
MODERATORS