77
submitted 3 days ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/sigh_fi@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I've always liked the definition that in SF, the rules are set by physics, and in fantasy the rules are set by the author.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's not quite right. In sci fi there are rules that remain logically consistent, based on known physics or not. In fantasy, they can make up the rules as they go along.

Compare Star Trek and Star Wars. Trek's subspace field theory is not any kind of known physics, but Trek is still sci fi. Because the subspace fields are fairly consistent about what they do. Star Wars' fan base damn near revolted when the series hinted that The Force might not be purely mystical.

Sci fi doesn't have to explain what the rules are to the reader. They just have to be be discoverable using the scientific method. Dragonriders of Pern is hard science fiction, originally published in Analog.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Stop pretending they didn't make shit up constantly in Star Trek

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I think of scifi as being fantasy + explanation. Not necessarily a good explanation, but AN explanation.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Sigh-Fi

352 readers
437 users here now

A generalist Sci-Fi meme community.

founded 5 days ago
MODERATORS