1851
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 151 points 1 week ago

The thing is just that its not that one woman, but hundreds of millions if not billions of people that follow trash separation rules.
This would actually have a pretty large effect, however sadly the recycling system is broken and often just a complete lie in many places in the world.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

This is why I recycle.

But it still sucks to see so much work undone by a few greedy fucks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago

the recycling system is broken and often just a complete lie in many places in the world.

In many places in the world, or mainly the US? I keep seeing this claim repeated but usually any proof is just about the US

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 25 points 1 week ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've ranted in various places over the years but it's 100% true in my city in Canada.

Decades ago we built a massive publicly-funded recycling system because the City could actually draw profit from the collection and sale of materials.

But about 15 years ago China stopped buying the waste, and it became a new shell-game of collecting the material but literally unable to do anything with it or sell it, so any that does get sold mostly ends up in the down-stream recycling economy, where the bulk of it ends up being burned. The rest goes into the regular old landfill. Even waste cardboard has no value anymore.

People who separate recycling in our city now, are just pre-sorting it for the waste management company and keeping it out of their regular waste (profit) stream.

We do have our ewaste centers but knowing people that work there, I can say anecdotally I've been informed that the metal and rare metal waste is collected and sent for processing in Ontario, the rest of the bits (all the plastic which is 90% of eWaste) goes into the regular waste stream where it's buried or burned, but never recycled.

Notice how Pepsi and Coke don't use recycled plastic? If that doesn't condemn the whole recycling "meme" as a sham, I don't know what would.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Recycling (edit: besides metal) does literally nothing, like it's actually 0% helpful, as long as we're producing more plastic than ever before every single year. We're closing in on 500 million tonnes of plastic produced—not total, produced—annually. Every single person can put every single piece of plastic in the recycling bin, and we'll still have more plastic than existed 50 years ago. There are many things that individual action can accomplish, and this is not one of them. We need legislation for this.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

IIRC plastic recycling is basically bullshit (except maybe PET bottles?) but aluminum is actually effective. Makes you wonder why we don't use more aluminum packaging in general.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I'm going to update my comment. Metal recycling is genuinely good, and recycling makes an enormous impact on the production of new metal

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Isn't it somewhere like only 1% of the recycling stuff actually getting recycled? The rest goes to some kind of landfill to a poor country that decides to take it. I saw this in some documentary

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

For plastics, pretty much. The thing about plastic recycling is that it's more expensive that making new plastic, and the recycled stuff is lower quality and unsuitable for many uses.

Metal.recycling, especially aluminum, makes economic sense and does better.

[-] match@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

about 21% of recyclables across the us: https://recyclingpartnership.org/residential-recycling-report/

as low as 9% in some states and as high as 34% in one of them

[-] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago

Like it’s been said that differs vastly by location. Afaik here in Germany it works quite okay … and European countries tend to have a higher incineration rate than the US. Burning the trash certainly isn’t the best solution, but at least it converts them into energy instead of just burying it somewhere.

But that aside, I like these "new" cups. It replaces part of the plastic with cardboard. That allows the plastic to be thinner, focusing on sealing it up and the cardboard handle the stability or even light protection. Though it can definitely be that there are some which are still as thick as they were, but that wouldn’t make sense for the producer. Here in Germany the plastic is often see-through and the cardboard printed on both sides. That’s usually used as advertising space, infos for waste disposal, but I’ve even seen it being used for cup noodles to mark the fill level.

Afaik paper is the thing where reycling works best currently, so it should be a win to replace plastic with paper.

The recycling rate increased in 2023. 79.3% of all paper and board consumed in Europe was recycled

- https://austropapier.at/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/23-00-EPRC-Recycling-Report.pdf

[-] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

The latter half of your comment is why I dont even bother. The "recycling" here is picked up and dumped into the same truck, there is no separation facility, just a landfill/incinerator.

Im not paying extra to lie to myself.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i lost faith in recycling the more I read about it.

especially when most recycling is sent to poor countries to be burned, and if it is actually recycled it is then shipped back again as a single use spoon, then sent back... all the way to less quality materials, and some uses are for fleece that produces a shit ton of microplastics.

real solutions is to ban single use plastics (maybe exceptions for medical uses).

now I'm in the States and I have no idea how to recycle where I am anyways.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Siresly 115 points 1 week ago

It's a fair observation and very agreeable when the intent is to focus deserved ire on the primary element responsible for the wretched state of the world. But this could also be used to absolve oneself of inaction, deny any personal responsibility, to justify exhibiting similar selfish behavior oneself, or to feel smug about demoralizing or shitting on people who seek to improve society somewhat.

As the meme itself implies, the exploitation class is the problem that needs to be addressed. No need for anyone else to catch strays.

[-] ericatty@infosec.pub 57 points 1 week ago

I don't see it as a way to justify inaction. I see it as a way to be forgiving of myself if I mess up sometimes.

Example: in the worst of my grief, I threw away some recyclables because I just couldn't wash them out properly. It took everything just to eat.

I didn't pile guilt on myself over it. I recycle 99% of the time, I never litter. I have to check my pockets for random trash before doing laundry.

Utility companies, corporations, and rich people are not cleaning up after themselves and their inaction almost negates everything me and everyone I personally know can possibly do.

Knowing they are dumping faster than I can shovel doesn't mean I stop shoveling. I still want and actively work to leave this place better than I found it.

Those 91 jets just mean I don't feel overwhelming guilt when I fail. I just try to do better next time.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do you think they feel “overwhelming guilt” about those jets?

The idea is to blame you for all the plastic shit they have forced you to buy because you need to eat and wipe your ass and clean your floor.

They don’t care what bin you put that shit in. It all goes to the same place anyway since they have admitted recycling is a scam and has been for the last 40 years.

It’s like conserving water. In the 80s, when there were “droughts” in California, they told people not to flush their toilets. 98% of water is used by commercial agriculture. THEY should be more efficient about their water use. We are subsidizing them. And they export a ton of this shit. Like almonds. Which take a ton of water to grow. (Spoiler alert on where they export that to…)

You ever see those public trash cans with like different holes for landfill and recycle, and then see underneath that it all goes into the same bag?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Utility companies, corporations, and rich people are not cleaning up after themselves and their inaction ~~almost~~ negates everything me and everyone I personally know can possibly do.

There's no almost about it. On an individual level, anything you and I do to recycle is dwarfed by the callous usage of resources by corporations.

You and I are out here doing our best to recycle the vast majority of our plastic waste when one of the local factories throws away more than a month's worth of your plastic refuse every shift when they throw away the plastic wrapping on just supply pallets. They may recycle the cardboard, but so much pallet shrink wrap would get thrown away at receiving and a shit ton more applied at shipping.

I fucking hated working for one of the local places and just watched all the plastic waste build up every shift. I still recycle because something is better than nothing, but it's still infuriating to have corpos guilt us about this shit while they do fuck all about it themselves.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 points 1 week ago

Well put. Don't insult the person doing what they can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not attacking the girl or suggesting she should stop. She's doing the right thing. It's attacking the rich psychopaths ruining the environment in ways that are orders or magnitude greater than my life will ever do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Robin@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Eat the rich, but not with plastic cutlery!

[-] jojo@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Even better: compost the rich!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Slightly off topic, but I find it goddamn funny that someone like MrBeast made a bootleg copy of squid game on his YouTube channel, considering the entire point of the programme was to show that billionaires will do whatever evil they please and get away without any single negative consequence. Not that the premise was too subtle, considering that the villains use humans as literal footrests. How someone can be this tone deaf or uncaring is beyond my understanding.

Edit: I just remembered it's the guy selling kids highly processed food with rotten cheese on top. So, considering that, I'm not too surprised. Just slightly.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

He wasn't allowed to kill them, though, so he's not quite on that level yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ougie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Wait till you hear how much pollution the army creates when they decide to mobilize an entire camp for no reason

[-] bigfondue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wow, I'm starting to think the military might be a net negative on this earth.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Navy just dumping jets in the ocean, like fuck it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

It may have changed now but when I was in the Navy in the late 80s we just tossed all our trash into the ocean twice a day. Everything: paint cans, medical waste, regular trash. It was disgusting

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago

What’s the point here? Shitting on a good deed because someone else has done something bad? Arguing that small contributions don’t matter because others cancel that out? Great, now everbody feels entitled to shitty behaviour because they’re not the most rotten apple in the barrel. I’m sure many good things will come from that line of thought.

The rule is “Don’t be a jerk”, not “Don’t be a jerk if you’re the only one”

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago

The post is not an indictment of recycling per se. Rather, it points to the absurdity of promoting individual contributions while ignoring the carbon footprint of corporations and the obscenely wealthy.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago

More like, we have to be perfect but billionaires get to be unethical.

[-] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

Even if most every day people would lower their carbon footprint as much as possible, corporations would simply say "Neat, we can pollute more, we're within target emissions", and they would

[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Bingo! Well said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So, this 'personal responsibility' recycling thing was pushed by corporations to excuse their wasteful bullshit.

Except the situation really is bad enough we need to be pinching fucking pennies ecologically. So we should be doing stuff like this (and actually recycling things rather than just dumping them, as happens now)

But none of that matters while billionaires are fucking around; you're just ordering cheap drinks at the craps table so maybe you can play a few more rounds. Your gains will be harvested to fuel the degenerate tendencies of the wealthy. They would matter in another world, be necessary in another world, but don't in this one, where they are necessary but wasted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago

I get the feeling this is somehow also criticizing this particular woman. Someone did a small good thing, while others do bad things on a very large scale. What a naive idiot! Not a very helpful sentiment. One needs to look up for moral guidance, not down.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not the woman that's being criticized, it's the people claiming that the ones not doing that bear all the blame for damaging the environment.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

except it reads as if its all useless and dumb. I don't understand how people don't see this as that?

It's not created to get people to be more on board with climate change policy. It's meant to point out that we just shouldn't do any of it.

[-] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

It does read useless but not necessarily dumb, just in vain. For me it acknowledges that we should put a lot more responsibility for the rich and powerful undermining our collective effort.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn 10 points 1 week ago

I think it's more like a response to the way one of these things is given a disproportionate amount of time and attention. We're all expected to micromanage every aspect of our lives to diminish our comparatively miniscule impact of personal choice while the state and the ruling class just do whatever the fuck they want actively slaughtering the environment for fun.

You know what would help me minimize my carbon footprint a lot? Public transportation. A renewable energy grid. Affordable food created along sustainable and environmentally conscious supply chains. Electronics and clothing that is manufactured with long term use, maintenance, and recyclability in mind.

Those things are all out of my reach to implement. Me properly sorting my recyclables (which i do) is such a minor impact compared with those other things. Any offsetting done by proper recycling is immediately undone the moment i step into a grocery store, having driven there in my car for lack of public transportation, and buy food that was wastefully produced and transported to my grocery store via fossil fuel based energy.

The majority of our time and energy should be going into fighting back against the state and the ruling class who refuse to structure society around environmental impact, not on almost the almost irrelevant impact of individual workers. We can and should promote recycling, but we can hammer home that point when our whole society isn't top down engineered with total indifference to the environment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tino@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Benefits of trying to go zero plastic is: you can eat healthier. No highly processed food, sodas and all this industrial shit. It's mostly fresh fruits, veggies, cereals, and once in a while, a bit of meat straight from the butcher or local market. And ok, you can't be sure it wasn't wrapped in plastic until it arrived in your kitchen, but at least, you have less garbage to throw out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago

Being ecologically friendly is its own reward.

If your neighbor's house and lawn is cluttered with garbage and rotting food, do you also let your house gather the same?

Or do you wish they did a better job and kept your house clean all the same?

What if you had 95 neighbors all full of garbage and rotted food? Is there any number that would make you do the same?

[-] adidev@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Not quite a compare - you can move house, you can't move planet. It's not that I would stop looking after my own garden if my neighbours weren't looking after theirs. It just feels pointless. Using your analogy, if all surrounding neighbours had rotten rubbish in their garden, no matter what you would do, it would still stink in your garden.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is exactly why I don't beat myself up over any of this shit... I will do what I can within my own power, but I don't go out of my way to stop using plastic forks or anything like that. It's pointless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

so what's the verdict on hot sauce and yogurt

edit i think i meant that for elsewhere but fuck this, that's a good headline in the image, and fuck this again

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

how hard is it to recycle, seriously? the way people complain about it you'd think it causes rashes..

In the US it's nearly impossible since the pandemic. Most waste collection firms are dumping both cans in the same truck and not recycling anything. Plastic recycling in particular turned out to be much more expensive than waste management was prepared to keep doing so they stopped.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
1851 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33502 readers
3106 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS