539
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 223 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't encouraging cession mean MTG is now encouraging active rebellion against the United States? And wouldn't that make her ineligible to hold office under the 14th amendment?

Let's get that lawsuit roll'in.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

You would think, but this is the second time she's suggested secession (admittedly she wasn't as blatant the first time) and nothing was done. I doubt anything will be done this time either. It wasn't even a major headline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

Voicing an opinion, especially a political one, is pretty heavily protected. I think there would need to be some other crime being committed (e.g. actually taking up arms).

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Good question No, if she only advocates for amending the constitution. Yes, if she tells people to take up arns

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 127 points 1 year ago

Alternative title: Margarine Trailer Queen endorses treason.

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Margarine Failure Gangrene got a face like leathery treason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago

The Union should have scorched earth the South when it had the chance. Tear up their train tracks, block the harbors, nationalize all the farm lands, dissolve the rebel states borders into Federal Territories, hang all rebel political leaders and put all military officers above Lt. in front of the firing squad. Instead, you let them live and fester, even naming military bases, ships and tanks after them.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

If we had done to the south after the civil war what the world did to Germany after world war 2, I firmly believe we would be in a much better place.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

Let's do a quick thought experiment and say there was an actual legal framework for states to leave the union. How do Republicans think that would go? Under no circumstances would any major city in the south go along with leaving. Republicans states are far more purple than elections would suggest due to voter suppression, election fraud, and gerrymandering. So in reality the confederate areas would just be poor rural areas. Add in the fact that the US holds the keys to all the military equipment and weapons, the confederate areas would turn into a lawless hell scape over night. And without nuclear weapons and no international agreements for defense, I'm sure Mexico and Cuba would love to reclaim some of their lost territory.

I can go on. But the main reason these idiots keep bringing this up is to suggest violence into getting their way. It's not even a viable option to even consider for them. The situation I made is a best case scenario for them to. If they tried to violently leave the union it would be couple million good old boys in trucks up against jets and tanks.

load more comments (38 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 86 points 1 year ago

And then blue states can stop funding red states and the red states will crumble even further.

Nine of the ten states that get the most federal fucking dollars and pay the least... can you guess? Go on, guess. That’s right, motherfucker, they're red states. And eight of the ten states that receive the least and pay the most? It’s too easy, asshole, they’re blue states. It’s not your money, assholes, it’s fucking our money.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140304131138/http://fuckthesouth.com/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 71 points 1 year ago

The 14th amendment prohibits her from serving in congress. Period. Unequivocally. Are we going to start enforcing laws or not?

[-] SevFTW@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

PaRtY oF LaW anD oRDeR

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

I might be in the minority, but I say let 'em go: provided they take a proportional amount of the US debt with them, and give back all the military assets that the rest of the country bought. They can re-staff all those military bases they named after Confederates on their own dime, while paying back debt and funding their own Social Security.

I bet once they actually get presented the budget for their ideas, all of a sudden they decide they like the Blue states (and their tax base) a lot more than they used to.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I fully agree, fuck em. What do they contribute, cotton? I'm willing to pay higher prices for imported goods to get rid of those racist pricks once and for all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Bwaz@kbin.social 67 points 1 year ago

Oh, wow. Texas, Missouri, Alabama, etc. become not our problem anymore? Gimme a petition to sign!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

This woman needs to secede from my internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Sounds like she should be removed from Congress.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 48 points 1 year ago

The only reason I'm not an advocate for this is because this would mean abandoning LGBT people, minorities, and women in red states.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

She's a traitor. Traitors get death penalty. --MGT

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago

Breaking News: MTG says controversial shit to stay in the news cycle.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Sure, but at what point do we say "this is treason" and do something about it?

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

We look at the definition of treason in the Constitution, conclude that unless we can prove she’s acting on behalf of a foreign power, it isn’t treason, call it sedition, which it clearly IS, and go from there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] darctones@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

America’s power is that we are one nation with access to two oceans and friendly neighbors. Our greatest threat is from within.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide.

--Abraham Lincoln

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

She should still be raving and slurring her words relatively harmlessly in some dive bar, but nooooooo...Georgia had to go and get her elected.

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

Ahh. Another Republican advocating sedition.

Lock her up!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elrik@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

It's almost as if she has no interest in preserving the strength of our union. I wonder who that really benefits...

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Cut off from the federal teat that they suck on, they wouldn't last a month.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mkhopper@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I wish she would secede from the planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PlatypusXray@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago

Russian asset doing russian asset things

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

No, you traitorous shit hag, you can't. You already lost one war and one SCOTUS case saying so.

[-] notatoad@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

yessss. do it. pleeeeease peel off some republican senate seats

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Is this not sedition?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Who cares what this dumbass wants? She should be getting asked why she was for the coup.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 23 points 1 year ago

"please do anything that helps my russian bosses!! im desperate!"

  • mtg
[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

A statement like this should get you instantly booted out of Congress

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

She should consider fucking herself in the ass with a cactus.

[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Well since seceding from the union worked out so great the last time....

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

She will say anything to stay in the news. Her big mouth, and the media's reporting on it, is the only way she remains relevant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

PLEASE DO! And say goodbye to all your federal benefits. Good riddance.

[-] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She's right. Blue states should consider it. I don't think blue staters in these comments realize how close abortion is to being illegal nationwide.

"Roe v. Wade will never be overturned, that'll turn the country into a warzone!!"

"States will never actually ban abortion, that'll turn states into warzones!!"

Yet here we are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago

You know, for claiming to be patriots they sure seem to hate the US.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

Stupid woman says stupid stuff, news at 11

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Go for it. A pretty big portion of the red states can't manage to balance their budgets. It would be funny to see them collapse under the weight of corporate greed and political ineptitude.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
539 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19239 readers
1845 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS