104
submitted 4 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org

The survey found that 32% of eligible voters believe Germany has worsened since Merz took office in May, while just 22% say the country has improved. A further 37% perceive no change at all.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] brot@feddit.org 57 points 4 months ago

Merz really, really did a large scale election campaign fraud: Campaigned on a platform of "no new debts, no new taxes", promised a lot and, well, they are now taking on new large scale debts, are talking about increasing taxes and abolishing holidays while moving to the right. Yeah, it's worse.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 4 months ago

Who would've known (besides those who know some basics about politics)?

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I've got it! Let's elect another neoliberal/conservative. That'll cure what ails ya!

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago

Anyone who is surprised by this should have their head examined.

[-] macke49@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Yes many the guys who said the old traffic light coalition failed, succeed in a larger fail. The CxU lobbyists in the cabinet go from clusterfuck to clusterfuck daily. The try a kafkaesk German version of MAGA. You don't want to hear more about this.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

The 37% that experienced no change will not feel the pain for several years as these policies take time to hollow out the country.

The CDU have implemented policies and taken actions that will result in a lower quality of life for the people of Germany. We must tax billionaires out of existence and protect our countries people and assets. 100 millionaires should not exist, and people like Merz should not be insulated from the pain and suffering they are all too willing to inflict on others.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago

Neoliberal «moderates» paving the road to the fascist right again. Happened in the US. Next up is UK, France, Germany, maybe Canada... Meanwhile, the Left everywhere, the only actual alternative, is derided as «delusional».

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A good part of the left is delusional. The left worldwide largely forgot about its core issue, wealth and income distribution, in favour of ridiculous and highly divisive identity politics, throwing the working class, its former core clientele, to the fascists.

Unless the left finally realise that it's a class war, not a culture war, they'll only ever be able to appeal to a small privileged elite dwelling in the social sciences faculties of institutes of higher education that contents itself in cosplaying as the proletariat in their spare time.

On top of that, the German Left also is full of Putin bootlickers and hopelessly naive "pacifists" who confuse pacifism with passive submission to force.

[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

While I agree the German left has too many Putin fans and vulgar pacifists. Your point on identity politics is a pretty reactionary point. Left politics means social justice. Class reductionism with social conservativism is not leftist politics. This is why you were compared to Wagenknecht in the past.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Had to look it up. Cui bono? One party seems to be played without understanding how they are used and suppressed.

Class reductionism is disparagingly used to describe theoretical and political frameworks that prioritize the significance of class relations over all other societal hierarchies. The term is used to criticize theories, policies or strategies that neglect to directly address racism, sexism or other social oppressions in favor of broad economic policies that are targeted at addressing the working class as a whole. Critics of class reductionism claim that this approach sidelines people, particularly working-class people, who want to take up the fight against other oppressions more directly, and fragments political movements on the Left as a consequence.[2] Class reductionism has been described as being opposed to identity politics and postmodernism.[3] The term has also been used to describe Marxist theory as a whole.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_reductionism

[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Basically class reductionism is used to promote the idea that equality of equity/elimination of class will solve all social inequality, but it is most often used against minorities such as queer people. You can't have social justice while ignoring the discrimination of minorities. It also goes for focussing on "identity politics" without fighting inequality of equity. You need to fight for all who are disadvantaged and not just some.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

I don't understand what you mean with equality of equity.

It'a a losing strategy to fight with limited resources every possible battle. Targets have to be prioritised. That the demand to fight each battle at the same time is even considered speaks for the deep influence of the elite on the left discourse.

Why can't the class war be fought first? Shouldn't that resolve all other inequalities? Who would suppress queer people under communism?

[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Limited resources is a shitty excuse to not fight racism, sexism and queerphobia.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

There is that Wikipedia page for this debate. This is a big debate. Arguments don't seem to lead to a result or a result would have been mentioned. I only know that it's bad strategy to spread resources thin. If winning is not important then an endless series of skirmishes that considers all topics equally is an option.

I would still love to know

Why can’t the class war be fought first? Shouldn’t that resolve all other inequalities? Who would suppress queer people under communism?

[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Again. What hinders you from fighting for queer rights and an end to class inequality simultaneously? The resources are there. If you don't think it is possible, then you have no desire to end real existing discrimination such as the ones I face as a queer person who has an ethnically diverse family.

I experience plenty of socialists who fight for both and make the fight intersectional. Why do you not want that?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Where do you experience discrimination? Who controls the situation? Do you think the discrimination would continue under communism?

E.g. it would be a waste of resources to fight for equal opportunities in work environments because a communist society would make that a requirement.

[-] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

As if any "real existing socialist" countries are beacons of queer rights. And queer people don't automatically don't get discriminated when the capitalist class doesn't exist. There are plenty of socialists and communists out there who actively call queer politics a product of capitalism.

Why do you think class equality, which communists are still is far as ever are from achieving, automatically creates equality for queer people and defeats queerphobia? As far as we could know, queer people could be labelled as counterrevolutionary as they have in the past.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

who actively call queer politics a product of capitalism.

That's disheartening. Are there reasons? E.g. if most queer people demand to fight all battles and not class war first then that is to be expected.

Why do you think class equality automatically creates equality for queer people

Because equality is the consensus among left politics. Who should establish inequality in a classless society?

I think we are past the point where people on the left would see queer people as enemies. Which arguments were used in the past?

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago

Thank you for this in-depth analysis (/s, just to be safe. The article consists of three sentences and doesn't even say who made the polling.)

[-] remon@ani.social 8 points 4 months ago

You have to scroll down past the birth-rate and migrant article to get to the main body (I don't know why).

Third of German voters say situation is worse since Merz took power

Chancellor Friedrich Merz has entered the summer break with lukewarm public support, a new YouGov poll for German news agency DPA shows.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is scary. The AfD might come to power.

[-] oyzmo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

So 68% are satisfied- that's quite ok in today's political climate 🙃

[-] Padit@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

That link brings me to an article called

Germany updates: Merz hails 'new chapter' in German-UK ties

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7992 readers
1864 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS