1447
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 134 points 1 week ago

The world needs many more Luigi’s.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago

"be the change you want to see in the world"

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago
[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Luigi's Mansion.

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 99 points 1 week ago

It's a cost many of us are willing to pay, they are killing us anyways, only slowly.

[-] Novi@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

This is the realization that will require far more people to suffer before they will act.

[-] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 91 points 1 week ago

So they believe that a person should die for killing a CEO, one person, but the CEO who created an AI specifically to deny claims resulting in many painful deaths didn't? suuuure. this totally isn't a revealing kneejerk reaction from elites pissing their pants

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 week ago

Social murder is not illegal because the billionaires make the laws.

[-] theLetterJ 52 points 1 week ago

The NYP article was published December 19th, 2024, if anyone was wondering.

Also if anyone was wondering, here's page 1 of a list of NYP headlines regarding this guy. You might agree they've made up their mind on the matter, and maybe also that there are better and less fascist places to pick up gossip if the need arises.

Bryan Kohberger, Luigi Mangione may share same rare neurological condition: What to know

LA rioters join the Democrats' pantheon of honored criminals

Fellow jailbird dishes on Luigi Mangione's job, daily routine and demeanor inside Brooklyn jail

Liberals turn killers, racists, and haters into martyrs

UnitedHealthcare accuses the Guardian of trying to 'capitalize' on CEO's killing: defamation lawsuit

Luigi Mangione's 'manifesto' reveals reason for targeting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, failed plot for mass casualty event: court docs

'Model prisoner' Luigi Mangione whines about wearing handcuffs, bulletproof vest — makes request to judge

The Post honored by NY Press Club for coverage of Luigi Mangione, assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson

The left's assassination fixation only further normalizes political violence

Accused DC Jewish museum terrorist Elias Rodriguez reportedly posted 'death to America,' praised Luigi Mangione in unhinged posts

UnitedHealth stock drops 17% after report it is being probed by DOJ for alleged Medicare fraud

Crowdfunding alleged cold-blooded killers and racists — this is no way to fight a culture war

Luigi Mangione gets killer 27th birthday present as defense fund tops $1M

The 'Luigi effect' that has C-suite executives on edge across the country

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City and leading authorities on a five-day search is scheduled, appears in court for a hearing, Feb. 21, 2025, in New York.

Luigi Mangione wants state murder case dropped, arguing double jeopardy in UnitedHealthcare killing

‘Delulu for Lulu’ Mangione fans swarm court | Reporter Replay Luigi Mangione musical celebrating accused killer's 'pearly white' teeth and 'folk hero status' set for California stage billy-anna-luigi

Ex Fyre Fest designer says fraudster Billy McFarland, Anna Delvey, Luigi Mangione have one thing in common Kirsten Fleming

Inside the circus at Luigi Mangione's court hearing — where supporters want to be heard, but not seen

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago

Can anyone name a single other news story where the press’ take was so completely at odds with the general population?

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The press treatment of this admin

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I'm not so sure, the current admin was elected by a populace who knew what they'd be getting. Support for Luigi on the other hand was pretty universal.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 39 points 1 week ago

Okay but the line break made it seem like "Latinos" did something lol.

[-] reptar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah the post went a little off the rails after that so we just cropped it

[-] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

He's also eligible for Jury Nullification. Remember, if jury selection(or anyone really) asks you what Jury Nullification is, you do not.

[-] DiaDeLosMuertos@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

That's the clause whereby it takes just one person too.....ohhhhhhh. I uuurm, oh look a carrot.

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

I'm sure whoever killed that guy was aware that the death penalty was a possibility. They probably made their peace with that possibility a while back.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

And yet they seem to still be out there, having gotten away with it

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 28 points 1 week ago

Kind of a nitpick, but the CEO wasn't a billionaire. It's also kind of an important distinction, because it's not necessarily the wealth that's the main problem, but how the owner class/bourgeoisie obtain their wealth/income. A slumlord worth less than a million is arguably as morally wrong as a Blackstone CEO (one obviously has more wealth/power/impact though). The evidence of owner class solidarity and government capture/corruption is also important. Rashid, being a politician, is likely trying to not alienate is millionaire donors.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

He may not have been a Billionaire - YET - but at his age, he certainly saw himself on that track. He was already ordering horrific policies on behalf of increased profit, so he would look good to his bosses and move up the ladder. He was already an active corporate serial killer, murdering people to advance his career and net worth. Eventually, if he sacrificed enough customers on the altar of profit, he would be rewarded with a Billionaireship.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Kind of a nitpick, but the CEO wasn’t a billionaire.

When you're earning $26M/year, it's just a matter of time.

A slumlord worth less than a million is arguably as morally wrong as a Blackstone CEO

From a very black-and-white "Bad thing is bad" perspective, sure. But there's a hierarchy of incentives and profits you're overlooking. The slumlord very likely carries their properties on some amount of credit, which means they're collecting rents on behalf of their lender. This lender, in turn, borrows money to increase their leverage and pays rents to a wealthier and more central lending authority. Eventually, the debts for all these loans get traced back to the major banks and other credit brokers, insurers, and private equity firms.

In a feudal sense, the slumlord is merely a plantation overseer and enforcer. The Blackstone CEO is the High Lord, standing on the backs of dozens of lesser aristocrats, who are themselves extracting wealth from their own plantation holdings, which all run thanks to legions of these slumlords going door to door every month to pound the rent out of their tenants.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Truly regressive to the age of tyrants and kings. Piss off the wrong rich guy and off with your head.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

It has always been thus. It's just accelerating now.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

We briefly had an age where, with some effort, the masses could keep the powerful in check. As you say…it’s disappearing now.

[-] andxz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's more like a pendulum that has been picking up speed in accordance to the power individuals (or groups of elites) can own.

E.g. a Roman emperor might've had absolute power in his day, but he still couldn't fuck it up for the whole planet at once, for example. Now, not so much, although we've had better periods in between.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Oh, I'm sure he won't become a martyr. These idiots are so scared and certain this is the best way forward, they can't imagine the consequences.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would be a shame if his execution caused copycats.

[-] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 week ago

If Americans had the balls to copycat this, they would have done so months ago, healthcare would have been reformed as a result or at least health insurance companies would be unable to find anyone willing to be CEO for them.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I doubt it will happen. But still, it'd be a real shame if it did.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Oh, I’m sure he won’t become a martyr.

I mean, its not even clear if he was the guy who pulled the trigger. Less a martyr than a scapegoat, as far as we can tell.

they can’t imagine the consequences.

The bitter truth is that we've got one dead CEO in 2025 and tens of thousands of dead UHC customers. This is math that the shareholders can live with, so long as it guarantees them continued economic growth into the next decade. CEOs are, after all, a dime a dozen. Hell, we're nearing a point at which they can be replaced with AI.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

CEO class is a part of the club. I'd love to see the infighting that would come from that.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

you know if the parent of any one child that has died in a school shooting was a billionaire said school shooters would also be looking at the death penalty.

who am I kidding, Billionaires don't send their kids to public schools.

[-] Kaliax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

So, in the second example, I realise those people didn't get the death penalty, but were they also eligible for it?

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 41 points 1 week ago

The line seems to be drawn at choosing whether to charge the murder at a state or federal level. In Luigi's case, he is being tried federally.

Which asks the question as to why Luigi's case is being tried federally while mass casualty/terrorism crimes are only being charged at the state level.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 11 points 1 week ago

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the state of Florida. And based on the Wikipedia link, Parkland could have qualified based on: 3. The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to many persons.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Because he crossed state lines to escape I guess?

[-] kayohtie@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago

It's an excuse given that is a piss poor reasoning overall.

[-] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

I think texas has a death penalty for capital murder, which begins at two or more murders done at the same time. That means the el paso shooter could have gotten it. Xorollo pointed out the florida possibility.

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

So, they're comparing someone who could have gotten the death penalty but didn't, to someone who could get the death penalty but likely won't?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I can't help but think they're just making it worse.

[-] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Is it so bad a thing to die?

-Virgil

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sed omnis una manet nox et calcanda semel via leti.

-Horace

[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Lol yes make a martyr out of him

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1447 points (100.0% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2310 readers
1 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS