1454
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago

So, in the second example, I realise those people didn't get the death penalty, but were they also eligible for it?

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 41 points 3 weeks ago

The line seems to be drawn at choosing whether to charge the murder at a state or federal level. In Luigi's case, he is being tried federally.

Which asks the question as to why Luigi's case is being tried federally while mass casualty/terrorism crimes are only being charged at the state level.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 11 points 3 weeks ago

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the state of Florida. And based on the Wikipedia link, Parkland could have qualified based on: 3. The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to many persons.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Because he crossed state lines to escape I guess?

[-] kayohtie@pawb.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

It's an excuse given that is a piss poor reasoning overall.

[-] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think texas has a death penalty for capital murder, which begins at two or more murders done at the same time. That means the el paso shooter could have gotten it. Xorollo pointed out the florida possibility.

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

So, they're comparing someone who could have gotten the death penalty but didn't, to someone who could get the death penalty but likely won't?

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1454 points (100.0% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2349 readers
216 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS