511
submitted 1 week ago by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I know there are plenty of software missing from here. This is just a fun infographic I made, no need to take it seriously :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lock@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

How is iCloud not secure or privacy focused? You make no sense with this list. iOS is insanely secure compared to stock android.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pretty sure banks have a pretty good track record of "keeping your money safe". Why the fork would anybody trust banks to keep their money safe if they can't keep your money safe?

I don't really understand why that statement is even on there?

Unless you mean to argue some anonimity point, which I could agree with considering e.g. Monero would be more anonymous than a bank.

But safe? I'd say the bank is quite safe to store money.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago

Money in the bank can be seized and frozen for all sorts of reasons. If you're in the USA, then police can charge your money with a crime even if you haven't broken any laws. It's safe until it's not.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can confirm. about 15 years ago, my bank account was frozen for 3 weeks for child-support enforcement. Only they weren't talking about my kid or even me. Some dude in Florida with my same first and last name was a deadbeat dad. So they froze my account because apparently, he didn't have a bank account or something.

What's super annoying about it is that we had different middle names, not even close to the same social security number, and not one person even contacted me before my bank account was frozen. I only found out because a check I wrote or something bounced. And I was like, WTF?

I was finally able to talk to enough bank people to clear it up. But it took 3 weeks. I never got an apology for it either. And the fuckers did not refund my insufficient funds fee. I mean, it was only $15 bucks, and it would have cost me more than that in my time to get a refund, but still...

So yeah, even here in the US, banks can suck.

[-] Semester3383@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Doesn't have to be in the bank either; if you're traveling with your life savings in cash, then if you get pulled over cops are likely to seize that money. Just because fuck you, that's why.

[-] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

Banks keeping your money safe depends on what country you live in and how much its government has regulated them and/or provided some sort of backup in the case of a run or the bank going out of business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] not_IO 65 points 1 week ago
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 45 points 1 week ago

Well, unlike Bitcoin, Monero is actually anonymous, and sometimes you gotta make payments online.

You can't do it privately with your card.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

This is the correct initial reaction but given the extent to which the US monitors every single transaction everyone makes, it's getting awful hard to manage the influx of feral hogs without having them streaming through your door.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago

Security isn’t the size of the app, it’s how you use it :)

[-] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Security isn’t the size of the app

This could have two meanings, one of which I figure I should address:

  1. If you mean "size of the userbase for an app," then yes, even projects that fly under the radar are much more secure than "mainstream" options. That's the main purpose of this infographic.
  2. If you mean "physical size of the app on the infographic," the reason they're different sizes is simply because they were hard to fit on one page, and this made it look nice ;)
[-] starman@programming.dev 31 points 1 week ago

What anubis has to do with privacy or security?

[-] RiQuY@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

Nothing, op confused anti AI with anti tracking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

I have this bad gut feeling about Signal and Proton, I have no evidence tho.

[-] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's because the current administration uses signal to plan acts of war and proton's ceo is supportive of said administration.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 week ago

They don’t use Signal though. They use a clone called TeleMessage Signal which logs and archives all their messages on an Israeli server, and which a hacker was able to access before the service was suspended.

You can’t really help if someone forks and misuses software.

[-] edel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Some of those mentioned likely are compromised, but cannot figured out which. The thing, is to diversify our risk and the privacy minded to use different platforms (Proton VPN and Mullvad VPN for instance).

The good news, is that if an agency is compromising something, they will likely won't use the intel gathered in court cases in order to leave it open to future prey, so that is good for vast majority of users. The very few that are relevant enough should not trust even the genuine privacy tools and resort to enhanced methods and combining methodologies.

My impression, and just impression, is that I would trust **Tuta **more than Proton (and not because Proton's CEO that many interpreted wrong anyways) On VPN... a tad more trust on Mullvad. Signal, I would not use it for high stakes communication but OK for most people. GrapheneOS seems okay and we know for sure it does not leak info on a daily basics, but we have to be careful, it could have an obscure code dormant waiting for a trigger or could easily send data to an unsuspected server, Ironically, if I were Snoden, I would feel more comfortable using a Huawei Mate with HarmonyOS than a Pixel 9 with GrapheneOS... of course China spies too massively, but it has far less beef with Snoden than the US does, therefore not of much interest to Beijing.

Remember that overwhelming majority of FOSS goes without any audit, let alone a comprehensive one. This is what some trusted party should put AI checking ASAP all the FOSS out there!

[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Very interesting insights. Funnily I use all of the services you cautiously recommend, including GrapheneOS, but not HarmonyOS, hard pass on that one. As a German I am also legally required to prefer Tuta. :) I still have that OG 1€/Month contract.

Edit: Your last point is a good idea, although I think the more popular an open source app is, the less likely it is to be malicious. A lot more eyes on it and the xz backdoor was caught pretty much immediately.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] spv@lemmy.spv.sh 23 points 1 week ago

where's the shovel and double-ziplocs to bury your cash, silver, gold, platinum, and palladium? or the zippo to burn your prints off? get on my level, ho

[-] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

You may be interested in this infographic instead ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The post is about security /privacy, the non American ceos political opinions don't impact that. Proton is still a good VPN/mail provider

[-] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago
[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

VPN services aren't for security they're for getting around regional blocks. If you want privacy build your own. But even then youll still be tracked

[-] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

They are multipurpose. You can't deny using a VPN over no VPN increases anonymity

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

But you do know that Tor/VPN is not really privacy, nor security? It hides your IP, but that's about it. If you still login, and give any information, and that could just be your "fingerprint" you are not anonymous...

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 12 points 1 week ago

I'll go further than this and say that true security is where everybody has support enough to not want to steal your shit, hack you etc.

Yeah corporations and governments are still a problem, for now, but both of the above parties would be far more secure if they did mutual aid, supported progrms to help the impoverished etc etc.

Basically having a collective approach to security and not such a myopic individualistic one.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

math is always stronger than marketing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vzqq 11 points 1 week ago

OP would not recognize a threat model if it bit him in the ass.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

It's not about what you use, but how you use it. PEBCAK Almost 100% privacy and security is offline at home, reading a book, if you bought the book with cash and not online and/or with credit card.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _AutumnMoon_ 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think anyone thinks WhatsApp is secure

[-] Undertaker@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, they do.
'But it's end to end encrypred' 🙄

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

proton VPN

lol. lmao, even.

[-] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

What's with the diss on Malwarebytes?

[-] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mainly because it's proprietary, privacy invasive by nature, and invasive on computers.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

It’s also a shit product riding on marketing laurels from its past glory days, like Norton. It leaves pieces behind that can cause malware to come roaring back.

It isn’t hard to just nuke a system or restore a backup people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
511 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

40028 readers
390 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS