183

A 57-year-old woman spent six days in the hospital for severe liver damage after taking daily megadoses of the popular herbal supplement, turmeric, which she had seen touted on social media, according to NBC News.

The woman, Katie Mohan, told the outlet that she had seen a doctor on Instagram suggesting it was useful against inflammation and joint pain. So, she began taking turmeric capsules at a dose of 2,250 mg per day. According to the World Health Organization, an acceptable daily dose is up to 3 mg per kilogram of weight per day—for a 150-pound (68 kg) adult, that would be about 204 mg per day. Mohan was taking more than 10 times that amount.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is what happens when people can’t get the healthcare that they need, and when Congress deregulates supplements.

[-] Remmiaz12324567@piefed.social 27 points 3 weeks ago

i dont think thats the only reason, some people believe in pseudoscience more readily than actual medicine. supplements have always been unregulated for decades.

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

People wouldn't believe in pseudoscience so much if they could just go to the hospital without hesitation or worry about the costs.

[-] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

In Germany this isn't true. The pseudoscience is thriving and in part supplemented by public health care. Homeopathy was a part of the anti-science campaign of the nazis and is still practised.

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

You can probably check this by looking at how often this kind of thing happens in:
a) Countries with a normal free-to-use national health system
b) America

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

As someone that has lived in both, I am sad to report that there isn't much difference.

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Please don't dismiss supplement users as pseudoscience fanatics.

You have no idea what it's like to live with a chronic illness, with no cure, and no treatment to eliminate the pain and suffering.

People like you harbor misconceptions about modern medicine as an infallible cure-all that isn't riddled with systemic neglect for women, PoC, the uninsured, and chronically ill people.

I take 8 supplements and 7 prescription medications a day. It fucking sucks to have to down 15 pills at night and another 7 in the morning. The only reason why I do is because those supplements are one of very few things that give a modicum of relief to the unending nightmare of pain.

And please don't start with the 'well ahktually studies shows that it doesn't work and it's just placebo.' Please don't decide for us how our own body feels. You cannot disprove our own symptoms to us, not especially when modern medicine has neglected chronic and autoimmune conditions for so long. Because these conditions primarily affect women, and women have not been treated as reliable witnesses to their own bodies, many chronic illnesses haven't even been accepted as 'real' conditions until the last few decades.

So please stop with the psuedoscience accusations. Doctors and researchers have no fucks to give about chronically ill patients, and we are left to trial and error every over the counter supplement we can do we don't kill ourselves from going insane with untreated pain and suffering.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you, I wish more people would get this. Access to healthcare is privilege, and full of it's own problems. Also, everyone crying pseudoscience in this thread is just flat out wrong in this case - turmeric is one of the most heavily studied supplements these days, and has been shown to be an effective anti-inflammatory and beneficial for autoimmune diseases, which is exactly what was claimed by the Instagram doctor referenced in the article.

I left a comment elsewhere in this post, full of studies on the subject.

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Damn you really felt called out, huh?

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

If you're not disabled or chronically ill, please sit down and listen to people who are. Lack of 'medical evidence' does not constitute a lack of medical effectiveness. The same way that a lack of diagnosis due to medical neglect does not constitute a lack of symptoms.

THC and CBD has always been used by chronically ill people, who were dismissed as drug addicts for using 'medically unsubstantiated' herbs to treat their pain. Just because research on marijuana is finally being conducted in recent times and it is being validated as a form of treatment, it doesn't mean that it only suddenly became effective. It always has been. The only thing that has changed is public perception of it.

It's easy for able bodied people to point at chronically ill people and claim that everything they do is a hoax or just placebo when they know nothing about how chronic illness works. Listen to them, and treat them as reliable witnesses to their own body.

A medical paper doesn't dictate the reality of how supplement affects each patient individually. Every person's biochemistry is unique. It's especially problematic when modern medicine is rife with systemic bias against certain groups of people. Ask doctors over the age of 60 and ask doctors who recently graduated if they think fibromyalgia is a real disease. It's disgusting how older doctors don't even think it's a real condition and that patients are just 'faking it'.

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Pseudoscience is correct, as they are replicating the look of something scientific without the substance.

Feel free to try whatever you think helps you. Don't complain when people correctly point out that there is no evidence to suggest it will, or that it's even safe for you.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Are you sure about that? You should really do some fact-checking before boldly claiming something is pseudoscience.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago

To add another layer to that, even if you believe in pseudoscience you should also have the basic understanding that absolutely anything and everything can be harmful if you exceed the appropriate dose. I can't understand why most people don't understand this

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

But you are still using "logic" there, while she was using "trust", in the perceived authority source of a combination of "doctor" + "government" (they wouldn't allow selling of something that could be dangerous).

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

People can die of drinking too much water, I see your point but I die on my hill

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

As too did she.

Misinformation is dangerous. Disinformation even more so.

Capitalism sometimes kill, literally.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And we have “wellness” influencers convincing you all you need is random supplements and to eat healthy and “brain retraining” and you’ll feel great TM.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

No, in this case it's literally just an overdose of something that is otherwise very beneficial. Even if we had better access to healthcare, things like systemic inflammation have a lot to do with lifestyle, and that's not something doctors can give people.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 weeks ago

daily megadoses [...] Mohan was taking more than 10 times that

that's a decadose at best

[-] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

Also microdoses are usually decidoses, but that's irrelevant because in this use mega means large and micro means small. Microcar. Microcomputer.

But what size are microplastics when also mentioning nanoplastics? Are they still "5mm and smaller"?

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

all very valid questions! also kilograms but never mega- or gigagrams?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 21 points 3 weeks ago

Stop following Dr Oz, he's a quack!

[-] treefrog@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago

The Instagram Doctor didn't bother to read the Wikipedia article on tumeric. I did yesterday because my mom has been taking it and heard about this.

It's not an anti-inflammatory and is a mild allergen. Some folks have immune systems that don't like it in other words. And liver failure is what happens to those folks when they take to many tumeric supplements.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

I have to have taken that dose in the form of curry before

[-] mriswith@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh yeah, it's basically a big teaspoon. Which isn't uncommon in a recipe of turmeric curry for two.

The issue here is that she took it straight in capsule form, every day, for several weeks.

[-] wraithcoop@programming.dev 11 points 3 weeks ago

Can't wait for the chubbyemu video to explain the science of what happens here

[-] foggianism@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

He's probably in the emergency room now, writing down all that is happening. "Hyperturmeremia - hyper- for high, turmer for turmeric, and -emia for presence in blood."

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

In my bathroom cabinet I have 6250mg tumeric gummies, which I take in the morning with my multivitamin for inflammation. I bought this well known brand (Jamieson) from a reputable source.

Am I not supposed to be able to trust that a basic suppliment from Shoppers is safe? This isn't "magic sleep improvement concoction" or some underground fad wellness brand selling mushroom infusions.... This is a large and old company that makes half the shit in my cabinet....

[-] dangrousperson@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago

googling for 3 seconds I found that Jamieson Tumeric Gummies only have 250mg Tumeric per Gummy, which is apparently equivalent to 6250mg of dried Tumeric. That is basically the recommended maximum daily dosage.

In general, no you can't trust 'basic' supplements, since they are poorly regulated. I'd also recommend getting supplements only for things that you actually need supplemented, i.e. a blood test shows you are deficient.

https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1143270524?ft=nprml&amp%3Bf=1143270524

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you for doing that. I found this out first thing in the morning and am now on my first work break, I hope I would have figured this out eventually but it was bothering me already today. My workmate had the rational thought "it's got to be a factor of 10 difference or something, you should reread the label when you get home."

But again, thanks, now I have a little peace in my head until I can do some more research. I poison my liver with alcohol. I don't need extra help....

As for why I take it, I was instructed to by my family doctor as well as my (far more trusted and who I've known far longer) Massage therapist, who explicitly said "I can't legally tell you to take supplements because laws and such, but go ask your doctor about x,y,z." Which I did.

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Massage therapists aren't licensed. Do not take medical advice from them. They know exactly as much about medicine as your plumber.

[-] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Massage therapists are fully licenced where I live (Canada) They are not, however, licenced to give advice about supplements. Which is why she told me to go to my doctor. But since she went to school for years and takes annual courses to keep up to date on human bodies and how they function, and she spends every day of her life literally hands on hundreds of different human bodies for the past 25 years so far, I'd say she has a much better grasp on how supplements affect people than my plumber, if I had a plumber.

[-] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

So you're saying I shouldn't take one of those supplements then go have a curry?

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

NO, you cannot, because they are NOT regulated in any way. 'Supplements' are not FDA approved. They are not tested to ensure safety. They basically do whatever they want until someone else proves it's unsafe.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

You should read the article in full, and keep an eye on the listed symptoms. Your dose does sound pretty high, but it also sounds like some people conditionally react to turmeric worse than others do.

I've read elsewhere that turmeric also reduces the absorption of some minerals. So I have it with my tea, as opposed to in my food.

[-] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

As a random internet person who knows not much about anything, you should definitely take them.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 6 points 3 weeks ago

This is why I want AI available to everyone. I want for people like this to ask AI if it's safe and for AI to tell her no. There's not enough doctors to go around, so we need something to fill the gap and provide common sense advice.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You think that a woman who took 10x the recommended dose of something would listen to an AI instead of a label designed explicitly for this supplement?

Or are you saying that we should encourage folks to get advice from an AI and respect it as they would a medical professional?

Also, what do you mean, "available to everyone?"?? Its baked into google???

Also.. Gemini seems to recommend 2000 mg at the top end of the range.... Idk man, that's real close to what she was taking daily. Seems bad!

Gemini probably sucks for this but I don't think AI is a great idea for this anyway.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not talking about a general commercial AI, I'm talking about a vetted, specifically trained AI that would be able to escalate queries to tele-operators.

Again, we don't have the doctors to go around, we need to figure how to fill the gap in medical care. Especially with aging populations. We can turn up our nose at AI, but it can save lives, even if it's just freeing up doctors to work on more urgent tasks.

[-] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

We still have pamphlets and texts vetted by professionals.

Ai is not needed when people can just consult health care providers websites. In fact I doubt people will trust AI over their "own research".

The problem is quacks trying to sell snake oil.

[-] match@pawb.social 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

who the hell can we trust to make a babysitter life coach AI for vulnerable people

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly, the government. I was speaking to a GP and they were saying so much of their time is lost doing basic commonsense consultancy with patients. If we can free them up for more important things like chasing up care that patients need and providing support, it's a win for everyone.

Is it probable? Likely not. But it's definitely something we should aspire towards. Everyone deserves the best possible care and figuring out how to do that with dwindling resources is imperative.

[-] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

By government, you mean RFK?

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not American 💁🏾‍♂️

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Sir this is Lemmy. I'm gonna need you to start hate-antromorphizing AI and refuse to even engage with it.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, my bad! 😅

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Commenters making blanket statements about quackery, and the dangers of the unregulated supplement industry - okay, yes, those are issues. But in this context, c'mon, Pubmed is right there. Turmeric is effective for exactly the things this social media doctor claimed it is, and a little more at that. I take half a teaspoon of the powder in my morning tea, and along with other lifestyle interventions I made a handful of years ago, the fairly significant chronic joint pain I used to experience has been a thing of the past.

This is an overdose story, nothing more.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30970601/

"The current study aimed to provide a comprehensive bibliometric overview of the literature on curcumin, complementing the previous reviews and meta-analyses on its potential health benefits. (...) The literature mainly focused on curcumin's effects against cancer, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Cancer types most frequently investigated were breast, colon, colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32075287/

"The use of curcumin reduces the subjective perception of the intensity of muscle pain; reduces muscle damage through the decrease of creatine kinase (CK); increases muscle performance; has an anti-inflammatory effect by modulating the pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8; and may have a slight antioxidant effect. In summary, the administration of curcumin at a dose between 150-1500 mg/day before and during exercise, and up until 72 h' post-exercise, improved performance by reducing EIMD and modulating the inflammation caused by physical activity. In addition, humans appear to be able to tolerate high doses of curcumin without significant side-effects."

Not so sure about the above line though, lol.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36898635/

"Curcumin supplementation significantly reduces anthropometric indices, and bioavailability-enhanced formulas are preferred. Augmenting curcumin supplement with lifestyle modification should be an option for weight reduction."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35979355/

"Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract had good clinical efficacy in the treatment of Psoriasis, UC and RA, so Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract could be used in the treatment of the above diseases in the future. The results of Meta-analysis showed that Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract did not show efficacy in the treatment of oral lichen planus, while Takayasu arteritis, SLE, MS, AS, BD and CD did not report sufficient clinical data for meta-analysis. Therefore, large-sample, multi-center clinical trials are still needed for revision or validation."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36804260/

"We observed that turmeric/curcumin supplementation significantly reduces levels of inflammatory markers (...) Also, turmeric/curcumin supplementation significantly improved anti-oxidant activity (...) It seems that turmeric/curcumin supplementation might be used as a viable intervention for improving inflammatory/oxidative status of individuals."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37325651/

"Curcumin is beneficial for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Inflammation levels and clinical symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can be improved by curcumin supplementation. Large sample randomized controlled trials on the effects of curcumin on patients with rheumatoid arthritis are needed in the future."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34012421/

"The results showed that curcumin's anti-diabetic activity might be due to its capacity to suppress oxidative stress and inflammatory process. Also, it significantly reduces fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and body mass index. Nanocurcumin is also associated with a significant reduction in triglycerides, VLDL-c, total cholesterol, LDL-c, HDL-c, serum C reactive protein, and plasma malonaldehyde. Therefore, it can be considered in the therapeutic approach of patients with DM."

[-] peteyestee@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Did she get it from onnit?

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
183 points (100.0% liked)

Public Health

969 readers
3 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS