183
Woman takes 10x dose of turmeric, gets hospitalized for liver damage
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
183 points (100.0% liked)
Public Health
977 readers
52 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
๐ฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (๐)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is why I want AI available to everyone. I want for people like this to ask AI if it's safe and for AI to tell her no. There's not enough doctors to go around, so we need something to fill the gap and provide common sense advice.
You think that a woman who took 10x the recommended dose of something would listen to an AI instead of a label designed explicitly for this supplement?
Or are you saying that we should encourage folks to get advice from an AI and respect it as they would a medical professional?
Also, what do you mean, "available to everyone?"?? Its baked into google???
Also.. Gemini seems to recommend 2000 mg at the top end of the range.... Idk man, that's real close to what she was taking daily. Seems bad!
Gemini probably sucks for this but I don't think AI is a great idea for this anyway.
I'm not talking about a general commercial AI, I'm talking about a vetted, specifically trained AI that would be able to escalate queries to tele-operators.
Again, we don't have the doctors to go around, we need to figure how to fill the gap in medical care. Especially with aging populations. We can turn up our nose at AI, but it can save lives, even if it's just freeing up doctors to work on more urgent tasks.
We still have pamphlets and texts vetted by professionals.
Ai is not needed when people can just consult health care providers websites. In fact I doubt people will trust AI over their "own research".
The problem is quacks trying to sell snake oil.
who the hell can we trust to make a babysitter life coach AI for vulnerable people
Honestly, the government. I was speaking to a GP and they were saying so much of their time is lost doing basic commonsense consultancy with patients. If we can free them up for more important things like chasing up care that patients need and providing support, it's a win for everyone.
Is it probable? Likely not. But it's definitely something we should aspire towards. Everyone deserves the best possible care and figuring out how to do that with dwindling resources is imperative.
By government, you mean RFK?
I'm not American ๐๐พโโ๏ธ
Sir this is Lemmy. I'm gonna need you to start hate-antromorphizing AI and refuse to even engage with it.
You're right, my bad! ๐