Absolutely. The solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Until Congress passes it, we will continue to deport people due to our overcomplicated and flawed system.

It’s also important to note that more immigrants cross the border under Democratic presidents, and most deportations under those presidents are people caught at the border, versus the rounding up and deporting of working, tax-paying immigrants who have been here for years.

You mean like how Obama was doing the exact same thing and Trump simply expanded on it but liberal media shoved it under the rug when Obama did it?

https://www.aila.org/library/detention

There needs to be some kind of immigration enforcement just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

No there doesn't. We don't have anything similar like a dedicated anti-immigration police in Canada or in the EU. There are border protection agencies and there are immigration bureaucracies, but this special immigration police thing going on in the US, is not a thing.

just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) handles this. They and ICE were founded in 2002 along Customs and Border Patrol. ICE is the result of the merging of two separate enforcement agencies: part of the US Customs Services and the enforcement arm of the Immigration and Naturalization Services.

Illegal entries caught within 100 miles of the border weren't classified as deportations until the George W. Bush administration. Obama was colloquially known as Deporter in Chief for these high numbers.

for an anarchist perspective on this topic: https://crimethinc.com/books/no-wall-they-can-build.

I was just going to point out that deportations were higher under Biden.

Then I remembered who that guy in the picture is!

Hindenburg literally appointed Hitler chancellor, approved the Reichstag Fire Decree, and gave the Nazis emergency powers by singing the Enabling Act of 1933. Do you not even credit him slightly for the rise of Hitler and the Nazis?

.ml user specifically

Anyone who knows the guy on the left: "Hindenburg went out of his way to empower Hitler and the Nazis when it was clear that his coalition was failing. Instead of working with the Social Democrats, he empowered the Nazi. Without his choices, there's a chance that the Hitler wouldn't have come to power. He's an awful person."

You: "so you think there's no difference between the two?!"

The guy on the left appointed Hitler and then gave him power with the Enabling Act and aided in giving him unchecked powers.

So without Hindenburg, Hitler wouldn't have been put into power. So he's far from a good guy.

How does this post say there is no difference?

Instead your comments tend to be similar to how republicans always claim "It is fine when my team does it"

Do you have anything better than using an ad hominem?

I like how in this analogy, republicans are Hitler and democrats are the guy who brought Hitler to power. Very apt.

Lebensraum, and the implied means to achieve it, was a policy goal of WW1 as it happens.

You like the politician on the left because he appointed the politician on the right.

ICE is going to recruit guerilla fighters to resist a genocidal ethnostate?

why /s?

if you want anything to change, vote, if you don't agree with any candidate, vote third party

elections are usually very close, if a third party is polling at about a few percentage points, major parties will bend over backwards to get those votes.

that's how we got Brexit (a bad thing) but it was weaponised third parties.

No