558
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

The End of Airbnb in New York::Thousands of Airbnbs and other short-term rentals are expected to disappear from rental platforms as New York City begins enforcing tight restrictions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 212 points 1 year ago

A blessing, really, for cities experiencing housing shortage.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A bummer though for anyone visiting as hotels become the only option, and prices go way up, beholden to moneyed corporate interests who lobby politicians in their favor and pockets.

Ed: just wow on the downvote brigading. Upvote/downvote is supposed to reflect whether or not the comment contributes to the conversation. Not killing the messenger when it's some info someone doesn't want to hear.

This is just very standard macroeconomics supply and demand, plus regular institutionalized political corruption.

Yes, Abnb sucks shit, and their prices are stoopid high, but that's the free market.

Ban them and watch hotel prices go up. Simple as that.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 172 points 1 year ago

AirBnB is just as corporate and lobbyist bullshit as any other company. Arguably worse, in that AirBNB breaks the laws and then tries to get laws changed.

Hotel chains at least try to lobby to change the laws before breaking the rules.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 117 points 1 year ago

Also, hotels are regulated in what fees they can tack on, and ensuring a basic standard of cleanliness and safety.

[-] GreyDalcenti@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago

In my experience over the last two years hotels are either same price OR less expensive due to AirBnBs bait and switch pricing. The taxes, cleaning fees, and random add ons are absurd.

In a recent example, staying at some Yurt for three days was $248. After taxes and fees it was around $515. Like wtf?!

I’m at the point where even if the pricing was flat, a hotel is 10X less hassle to deal with than AirBnB.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

Airbnb was nice when it was just a way to rent someone's extra bedroom for the night. I've met some amazing people this way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gyrolemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Gotta wonder if the competition from airbnb kept hotel prices lower. I do agree with you though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

The last few times I've tried to book an AirBnB the price difference from a standard hotel room was almost nothing. AirBnB has been trash for awhile.

I find AirBnB to be cheaper when renting an entire house vs 3 or 4 hotel rooms. But an apartment vs a hotel room is even or the hotel is cheaper

[-] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I agree. Family of 5 many hotels require us get 2 rooms. Plus no option to cook meals makes for a much more expensive stay usually. At least until a few years ago when airbnb went insane with the cleaning fees plus cleaning requirements and all that nonsense.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

I think it's been too long since you've looked at Airbnb. Prices are no longer a deal in contrast to hotels. It's all inflated trash and no longer accessible for regular people.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but you get charged cleaning fees, but you need to clean the fucking place after. AirBnB is a scam pure and simple

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no people forced to use the same highly regulated service as millions of forebears. Tragic.

People downvoting either aren't old enough to remember how bad hotels were, or are wearing rose colored glasses.

When airbnbs came to my city, after a few years, hotels finally lowered prices and made a effort to give a shit. I hope it doesn't fall back to that.

But then again, the past few years, Airbnb rentals seem to be run by shady companies instead of by homeowners with an extra room.

[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Airbnb has basically become "hotel prices, but the cost is hidden behind cleaning fees". Also, hotels basically stopped giving a shit after the pandemic. No loss here.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

Rather hotels be inaccessible than housing. You only need one of those to live.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

Then what are you lamenting exactly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Have you considered building more housing?

[-] finnie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

True! Getting rid of these AirBnBs probably doesn't hurt things though. Now they might actually get a long-term resident.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It probably doesn't but you have to wonder why that company was so successful to begin with. I feel like we are celebrating a weight loss company getting banned.

There is a housing shortage, there is a hotel room shortage. Someone took advantage of that. Getting rid of that someone doesn't stop the next person.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I was successful because it's skirting (pretty blatantly breaking actually) rental laws and thus gains an advantage over the competition.

[-] finnie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well I think it was successful for the same reason so many unicorn startups are. They were bankrolled by promising angel investors marketshare so they were able to run artificially brutally low prices to dry out the rest of the market for years. But now investors are asking for those profits back and we're here dealing with horrible Airbnb prices AND it made the housing crisis worse. Double whammy, bb!!

[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 152 points 1 year ago

Good. That was kinda the whole fucking point of Airbnb in the first place. If you want to own property for the sole purpose of short term rentals buy a hotel.

[-] Motavader@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Yep. Just like Uber it morphed, from people sharing a ride or their place while on vacation, into full time drivers and landlords. Not the philosophical intebt of the original service, and it ruined it for everyone.

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I mean Uber started as a black car service and wanted it to be possible for drivers to do it full time if they wanted. Neither Uber nor Lyft were ever billed as “make some money sharing a ride to where you are already driving”, the platform doesn’t even account/allow for that.

I fully agree on Airbnb but I don’t think the Uber example works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bye@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago

Smart. People can still rent out an extra room, but can’t squat on an apartment solely for Airbnb.

That’s how airbnbs were when I’ve used them in the past, things like a place where you can sleep on someone’s couch, or a house with a spare room you can crash in. Those kinds of arrangements were way cheaper than hotels and very appealing.

[-] yaycupcake 67 points 1 year ago

The rent for regular apartments has basically doubled in the past couple years. You see studios go for $3000/mo, and 1 bedrooms for $4500+ quite often. I really hope this will have a helpful effect on lowering for the people who already live here, who can't make ends meet because of absurd rental prices and hikes lately. There needs to be more housing and reasonable prices for people who live here. Compared to the median income here (and not the mean, because it's not representative to count the billionaires), it's literally not affordable for the people who grew up here and started their lives here, to afford to have a roof over their head. That's why you see shit like 5 unrelated adults in a 1 bedroom apartment together, or a big extended family of multiple generations, partners, etc., all living under the same roof. Nobody can afford anything better here.

[-] Changetheview@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

It is a serious crisis in many places throughout the world. Especially considering the income stagnation. I have lived in many cities and have heard this cry across multiple continents, from coast to coast, and at most income levels (except the ultra wealthy).

What I’m hoping becomes more popular are ways to make the short term rentals not as profitable. I really like the idea what other cities are doing by limiting the number of days they can rent it out.

Sure, rent it out for 45 days a year and get $10k total revenue and try to scrape out a profit. Or rent out the unit as your primary residence for the entire year for a similar cost.

It’s not absolutely perfect, but it will greatly reduce those willing to buy places to use as an investment for short term rentals. And that should put negative pressure on housing prices, while also opening up more units for primary residence housing.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Generally speaking, housing costs don't decrease without a major economic event. Positive economic circumstances that raise housing costs set the benchmark, and negative events reset those.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Isn't this quite a major event? More empty homes -> more places to choose from -> more competition -> lower prices

[-] Changetheview@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huge. The short term rental housing boom is unlike almost anything we’ve seen before. Estimates put short term rentals as about 20% of the global real estate market.

If that demand drops rapidly, it will mark a major shift. Tons of buyers and capital will be wiped off the table.

I agree with the usual perspective that housing prices almost always rise over time. But this is an unprecedented event in scale, and if reversed, it will have unprecedented ramifications.

[-] LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

This doesn't need to immediately lower housing costs to have a positive impact.

Hypothetical numbers... If housing was going to go up 5% in the next year and this change causes that to go down to a 1% increase, it will have made things better. Of course, we'd all like to just go straight to lowered housing costs. But individual changes can still do good and bring us towards that goal without strictly accomplishing it.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago

I hope that these type of easily exploitable services just absolutely die. New York is the last place I would have expected to hear these type of services turned scummy to start to disappear, but I welcome it and hope it spreads across the country.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Downtown service businesses looking at empty offices due to WFH. "Well, at least people still come downtown for its hotels. Tourists still have lots of money to prop us up!" AirBnB gets banned, hotels start jacking up prices. "Well, #$%#."

I think offices into hotels would solve both problems, right?

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 34 points 1 year ago

Hotels require a vastly more dense plumbing structure, I don't think it's easy or cheap to retrofit onto an office building.

[-] Gyrolemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hotels with dorm like shower systens maybe could work. I think something like a hostel.

That being said you cant charge much when you are forcing customers to share bathrooms.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Well, shared bathroom means zero stars so yeah, you basically can't call it a hotel anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With enshittification and being one of the worlds top tourist cities of course you can! Just look what they charge for rent. Then LA and Chicago will follow suit ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

99% invisible just did an episode on skyscraper conversion. Its farily complicated.

[-] iegod@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Toronto desperately needs this.

[-] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

~~Toronto~~ Everywhere desperately needs this.

[-] nix@merv.news 21 points 1 year ago

I feel like this approach to Airbnb is the wrong way. They should pass laws to prevent anyone from owning more than 2 homes and one of the homes should be one they live in. Corporations shouldn’t be able to buy multiple homes to rent out.

Airbnb makes it way easier for people to find places to rent, instead of focusing on making the housing crises better by preventing landlords and corporations from buying all the homes to rent out they’re just making it harder to rent places… fix the system don’t just focus your efforts on making one tech harder to use

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This move was entirely brought about by the corporate hotels in the area.

AirBnBs are not the cause of the housing crisis. Corporations, and especially those from overseas, buying up properties so that they can be rented out (again, not through AirBnB), are the issue. That goes for NYC and across the country.

This is a hit to my family, but we’ll carry on. We put my grandmother’s house in Queens on AirBnB three years ago. No stupid cleaning fees or asinine rules. It’s literally a family home open to people wanting to stay a few days. We only had it on AirBnB to cover the taxes for the house that’s been in our family 70 years. We’re not suddenly going to sell the house, so now it goes to 30+ day rentals or sits empty. I guess it will be easier for me to block out days now, but whatever…

[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Congrats on being the minority. You're not the problem, but many others are not in your position.

[-] DestinyGrey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

Who is having trouble finding a hotel room in New York City? It's expensive, but everything is expensive there.

[-] talos_the_true_god@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

ELI5: why is having airbnb’s a bad thing? ( not local, not in the loop )

[-] Changetheview@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

It applies to anywhere. The problem isn’t one situation. It’s this same story, repeated thousands of times in every city across the globe.

Bobby wants to live in a house. Monthly rent prices are usually around $1,000 per month in his home town.

Joe wants to make money by renting out a house on AirBnb. Hotel prices are usually around $200 per night in the same location. If Joe rents out his house for just 10 nights a month, he can make $2,000. This easily covers Joe’s expenses and puts the extra cash in his bank account. If he rents it out for 25 nights, he’s putting away a lot of cash.

When houses are up for sale, Bobby can only spend a similar cost as his rent. Joe has been watching his bank account climb and is ready to spend a lot on another house to put on AirBnb. Joe can make a profit even if the house is double the price.

Bobby’s landlord sees housing prices rise. Decides to either (1) increase Bobby’s rent to $2,000 - which he can’t afford or (2) sell the house to someone like Joe for a major markup.

Bobby has to move in with roommates and will never be able to afford to buy a home when competing against all the Joes out there.

[-] talos_the_true_god@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Got it, thanks!

[-] pgp@lemmy.pt 21 points 1 year ago

Raises rent prices, overall cost of living and takes apartments from long term rental market.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
558 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
2737 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS