63
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 5 days ago

In before this creates a safe space for transphobia and bigotry but does nothing to address shit like that one YouTuber that recently got permanently banned because she knocked over a lamp their automated systems flagged it as "child abuse content."

[-] djsoren19 43 points 5 days ago

My guess is that MAGA content was getting flagged, and Youtube believes that should be monetizable in modern America.

[-] KAtieTot 28 points 5 days ago

Their advertisers are prolly salivating about it, if not behind it.

Maga are great for advertisers, low information & highly susceptible.

[-] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Was rumble the alternative for that, did it start to do well

[-] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 33 points 5 days ago

If this means I no longer have to hear the word "unalive," great.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 33 points 5 days ago

I don't think that's affected. It sounds more like political propaganda which gets allowed. I bet this will still be censored and lead to demonetization just as it is today.

[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The example given in the article already seems concerning. It's just going to allow misinfo to spread worse than it already was

[-] leviathan@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago
[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 17 points 5 days ago

incorrect or misleading information

[-] leviathan@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

You think YouTube (the company) can shield you from that?

[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago

I think there's a moral obligation to at least make an attempt to reduce harm. Especially for topics that have very real life or death consequences (like vaccine denial). They have already shown they can do it to some extent with the info banners that pop up on videos.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 16 points 5 days ago

🤣 this will end well. Acceleration to the max!!!

[-] leetnewb@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I watch a sketch comedy group that gets abused by YouTube's moderation. Some of their stuff leans edgy, but the moderation and demonetization seems pretty arbitrary. There is no viable appeal process or viable alternative platform. Reminds me of how Google controls the Play store and removes open source projects for arbitrary or spurious reasons.

I take less issue with aggressive moderation and more issue with the lack of infrastructure to handle the concept that the first line ai decision might be wrong.

Adding to that - Google's effective monopolization of "amateur" video distribution, and coincidentally monopolization of app distribution and monetization on the 70% market share mobile platform, makes it more problematic that the company is unanswerable to moderation mistakes.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39201 readers
86 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS