53

Here's a list of the best wireless headphones you can buy right now, as reviewed by Engadget editors..

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kukkurovaca 25 points 2 years ago

Audio gear with non-replaceable batteries bothers me so much

[-] pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org 3 points 2 years ago

My old Sony xm3, while not having officially yser-replaceable battery, is somewhat easy to open and replace batteries.

[-] tojikomori@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Anyone found any decent wireless ones with replaceable batteries? I was interested in the Fairbuds XL but it's not well reviewed.

For a while I had a pair of Sennheiser TV headphones that took AAAs, but they required a dedicated transmitter and weren't great for music anyway.

[-] kukkurovaca 4 points 2 years ago

One sort-of semi solution is to use a bluetooth dongle with wired headphones. Usually still not easily replaceable batteries, but at least when the thing dies or becomes outdated due to codecs changing, you're not wasting as much money and material as you are when you need to replace a whole headset.

There are a lot of decent dongles nowadays. When last I checked I think the Qudelix-5K was the one to beat.

[-] DoucheAsaurus@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

The qudelix is stupidly powerful for how tiny it is, especially if you run it with balanced cables.

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I love mine, and the battery management on the qudelix is phenomenal. Built in 80% mode, doesn't pull from battery while plugged in. And it looks like it could be opened with a screwdriver though I haven't tried.

[-] agegamon@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So these definitely aren't audiophile grade audio, but I have the Steelseries Nova Pro which comes with two hot-swappable and replaceable batteries. Always changing one while the other is in use, so I never have to worry.

Main reason I got it was the dual/simultaneous USB and Bluetooth. I'm on Discord or calls on my phone a lot for personal, but want to stay connected to PC via USB for audio (either Teams for the work pc or gaming on my desktop).

I've heard the newer version is slightly better, but probably still below audiophile standards. Either way my ears are pretty wrecked and I can't really pick up fine notes. They're fine by me!

[-] sweng@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

If I search for Fairbuds XL reviews most of them seem very positive and hardly point out any major flaws. What are some of the negative aspects?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Not a fan of AAAs. They just don't hold enough power.

My approach is just to get ones where the battery last far longer than you need. I'm not entirely happy with that, but my several year old pair has gone from about a week and a half to about a week as the battery has aged. I'm fine with that.

[-] adamthinks@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not a terrible list. But there are much better sources out there for audio reviews and opinions.

Crinacle.com
Head-fi.org
Soundguys.com
Soundstagehifi.com
Stereophile.com
Whathifi.com

I'm sure there's a few others.

[-] costa@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago

I always go to rtings if I wanna buy something. They make such detailed reviews!

[-] SandwichStan@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

i like wirecutter too!

[-] DoucheAsaurus@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

We need a new list every year because the fucking things don't have replaceable batteries :/

[-] costa@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Maybe EU will make a legislation about headphone batteries too…

[-] Weaselmaster@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They should focus on electric cars. Replacing tiny batteries in thin phones or thinner headphones is silly to legislate compared to gigantic batteries in big cars. The rest of the car could easily have a 20 year life with no internal combustion engine, but most get scrapped after 6-8 years.

If they want to pretend that they’re saving the planet with legislation, go for the real volume.

User replaceable batteries in earbuds would make them thicker and heavier - exactly what consumers say they don’t want.

[-] moonw0man@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Electric Cars have replaceable batteries? No one’s throwing away that much money in precious metals. Recycling companies are spinning up to handle EV batteries as they start to fail, which they haven’t in large numbers yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] joelthelion@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Are they really impossible to replace, though?

[-] TechnoBabble@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Probably not.

But most wireless headphones would be destroyed in the process of taking them apart.

I imagine some of the larger models above have (skilled) user replaceable batteries.

[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

They are not designed to be replaced

[-] Hammy@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

I've been rocking my Sony WH-1000XM3's for going on 5 years now and have had absolutely zero issues with battery life (or anything else for that matter). I wear them several hours a day, every work day for Zoom calls, etc. They've traveled with me and are great for flights.

I'd buy another pair (of the newer model) in a heartbeat.

[-] freebread@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Same here- best headphones I've ever owned!

[-] ojmcelderry@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

🙋🏻‍♂️ Sony WH-1000XM2 owner here, and I'm equally as happy. They're still going strong after years of heavy daily use.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 8 points 2 years ago

I'll stay wired for the foreseeable future. Headphones I have to charge just seem like an extra inconvenience to me.

[-] joelthelion@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

When you use them for work, not being tied to your computer is really nice.

[-] throwaway@monero.town 6 points 2 years ago

You should try some. I've got the Sony XM4s, the battery lasts for an eternity and I never want to faff about with wires again!

[-] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

But the latency for music games is the issue, since that's typically when I'm reaching for headphones.

[-] andyMFK@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Wireless headphones all have an expiration date, they are all future e-waste. A good pair of weird headphones Will last a lifetime if taken care of

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

Sony XM series have wired mode. Although the noice cancel feature still needs battery

[-] moonw0man@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I use my XM4’s wired with my PC every day because I don’t like Bluetooth latency but love these headphones. The flexibility of wireless when I need it occasionally is great though! (Like today I’ll use them on a flight later)

[-] supersonicstork@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Honestly the average user should probably go wireless. The convenience factor is huge, and most of these new headphones come with active noise cancelling.

The average pair of wireless headphones is also good enough for casual listening (depending on codec) and can come pretty close to wired solutions.

That said, I would never go for wireless on ear/over ear headphones again. The more features something has, the harder it is to fix when something breaks.

My wireless solution is a set of mmcx in ear monitors connected via Bluetooth adapter. Even without active noise cancellation, they block out sound well. For desktop my job requires critical listening, and I like neutral signatures, so I'd rather stick to desktop monitors and wired solutions.

[-] ArtificialLink@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

The convenience of wireless is great but it also means you'll need new headphones right around ever 5 years.

Wired is still the best option hands down imo. I can buy headphones that last for decades not years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Goronmon@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

You know you're getting old when even the "budget" item on a list like this seems expensive.

The idea that people are just dropping $300+ on a a headset is crazy to me.

[-] SVcross@feddit.cl 3 points 2 years ago

I use a Beyerdynamic Custom Studio One and a Bluetooth adapter, when the adapter dies, I just change the adapter, much cheaper and better sound.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Headsets and headphones are not the same thing and have very different market demographics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iuseit@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 2 years ago

Destpite how shitty apple is I fuck with the airpods pro so hard

[-] Towerism@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Even though I own a pair of nice noise cancelling Sony headphones, I've stopped using it completely. I now only use my airpods pro. I think it's because I hated Sony's app. The airpods pro are just so much easier to use.

[-] variants_of_concern@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

I forgot my sony earbuds have an app, I really enjoy the sony earbuds but the mic is completely useless, I tried to be cool like my coworker and use earbuds for meetings and I can hear him clearly through his apple earbuds but no one can understand me, I had to order a headset to use for meetings in order to participate

[-] ojmcelderry@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

I think the terrible microphone quality on Bluetooth headsets is down to limitations in the Bluetooth protocol itself.

For all the hype around wireless headphones, I really wish they'd fix the potato quality microphone audio. It seems so odd to me that it hasn't been fixed by somebody yet.

[-] Harlan_Cloverseed@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I would use the beats fit pro instead if the case wasn’t twice the size

[-] afunkysongaday@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Someone knows some <$100 over ear headphones with solid anc?

[-] ProtoDan@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

I find poorly implemented anc on cheap headphones to be painful. You'd be better off looking for good sound isolation.

[-] afunkysongaday@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I got no experience with ANC in over-ears. It's weird: with in-ears, you get pretty good ANC even in the cheaper <$50 ones. But it seems like you can't get decent quality anc in cheaper over-ears...

Slightly rephrasing my question: what's the least I have to spend for over-ears decent quality and?

[-] ProtoDan@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

Probably Anker soundcore Q20

[-] StoicLime@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I got the Sony WH-CH720N's. They're pretty great.

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have tried several, and been thoroughly unimpressed. My advice is to save up and spend the extra money on ANC that's actually good. Sony and Bose both make EXCELLENT cans with great battery life. QuietComfort from Bose, and the WH-1000XM series from Sony. Don't cheap out, you'll get an inferior product.

You can get them used if you want, usually for under $200. Just replace the ear pads if you're paranoid about germs. I got a used set of WH-1000XM3's from a friend and they've been amazing, for two years now.

You can find similar prices on eBay, or here: https://www.unclaimedbaggage.com/collections/headphones#/filter:vendor:Bose/filter:vendor:Sony/filter:ss_filter_type:On$2520Ear$252FOver$2520Ear

Unclaimed Baggage is a cool website, they sell stuff that people left on airplanes. Looks like there isn't much in stock at the moment, but check back periodically and you'll see a lot of good Bose deals.

[-] neardeaf@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

And here I am mourning the soon to be death of my Bose QuietComfort 35 WIRED earbuds with the insanely soft comfortable silicone ear tips with WINGS that fit super snug & comfy, never fall out.

I’ve yet to find a sub 120-150 dollar replacement for them. I’ve been using them daily for like 10+ years :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mcatis@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Something I whine about a lot is that the Bose QC45 is one of my least favourite device upgrades ever. I owned a pair of QC35 II's and I loved them, but I had an opportunity to get the QC45s through my work and figured it'd be nice to have USB-C, so why not. The QC45's are exactly the same in pretty much every way with the exception of USB-C — not an exciting upgrade, but whatever, boring is fine if they work well. But they inexplicably decided to remove the mid-level noise cancelling option that the QC35 II's had. That was an option that would essentially turn down the sensitivity a bit for windy conditions, which I need to wear the headphones outside. On the QC45's, there's only full noise cancelling or off, both of which result in enormous amounts of noise if there's any wind, making them completely unusable outdoors. I've reached out to Bose a few times just to try and understand the decision, but they've never even replied to me. It's a shame, because the QC series are the most comfortable headphones I've ever worn, but I can't justify buying anything from Bose again.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
91 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS