583
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Under the new restrictions, short-term renters will need to register with the city and must be present in the home for the duration of the rental

Home-sharing company Airbnb said it had to stop accepting some reservations in New York City after new regulations on short-term rentals went into effect.

The new rules are intended to effectively end a free-for-all in which landlords and residents have been renting out their apartments by the week or the night to tourists or others in the city for short stays. Advocates say the practice has driven a rise in demand for housing in already scarce neighbourhoods in the city.

Under the new system, rentals shorter than 30 days are only allowed if hosts register with the city. Hosts must also commit to being physically present in the home for the duration of the rental, sharing living quarters with their guest. More than two guests at a time are not allowed, either, meaning families are effectively barred.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ares35@kbin.social 174 points 1 year ago

the early days of airbnb was basically this concept.

they didn't start out as a marketplace for unregulated hotels that destroy housing markets. that didn't happen until after they started cashing checks ~~venture~~ vulture capitalists.

[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 89 points 1 year ago

So many people forget this origin. Air mattress in your spare room (in SF), iirc.

As much as I, personally, prefer a house when away - either with the family or as a couple - this is one of the drivers behind the crunch in housing. People can’t possibly afford to by a place to live when the competition is a wanna-be property “entrepreneur” who is going to get 2-4x market rent by doing short term rentals.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

Originally my mum moved my brother and I into the same room and rented out the empty room for $40 a night. The cleaning fee was $20 and we still cleared $2,000 in one summer.

My brother and I each got a 5% cut and we bought ice creams from Safeway every day for a week until we got wicked stomach aches

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dystop@lemmy.world 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I took a trip out to the Rockies earlier this year, and booked an AirBnB. The listing was for the basement of a house where a lovely old retired couple lived. The basement was decorated and furnished beautifully, and we got to chat with the couple every now and then. They gave us recommendations to a farmer's market which was pretty cool.

It was the first time I've ever booked an Airbnb that was true to its original mission. This is what AirBnb should be - renting out spare rooms - and not a turn-an-apartment-unit-into-a-hotel thing.

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 146 points 1 year ago

NY is killing it. More of this, please.

Airbnb has fought the rules in court, arguing they were essentially a ban, and that they would hurt visitors looking for affordable accommodation.

They're called hotels. A ban is appropriate. Fuck you.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

Not to mention legitimate bed and breakfasts are still legal and well regulated businesses.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Hotels are not an end all be all solution. They are significantly more expensive when dealing with large family's or groups of travelers. Most do not allow pets.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago

That doesn't outweigh the problems being created. A bnb isn't supposed to be the same as renting a cabin for the week.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] ninjirate@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago

Damn this seems like a hot take given the comments but I think these rules are dumb. If I go on a two week vacation somewhere else I should be able to rent out my place for those two weeks. The issue isn't AirBnB as a whole, it's people buying up places for the express intention of only using it for AirBnB,

There should be some cap on often a place can be used for short term rentals like 4 weeks out of the year, enough that people who vacation somewhere else can use AirBnb and low enough that it makes more financial sense for people to rent it out long term instead of short.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago

The issue is how to enforce granular rules like that. You'll end up with people buying time shares of airbnbs or some other wacky workaround. The issue ultimately is, if you leave any wiggle room, grifters will ruin it for the people using that wiggle room as intended. You can't put in a law and expect everyone to adhere to the spirit of said law. I think with the litany of other property value issues that NY has, this hard line in the sand makes sense. It sucks that the grifters ruined it for people like you and I but the fact of the matter is that they did.

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There should be a cap to how many buildings a person or a company can own. Why a person can have more than 3 homes? In the current world, this does not make any sense.

[-] ninjirate@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

100% agree and while at it I don't think any single family homes or rowhouse/townhouses should be owned by corporations. Apartments and such I can understand the building owned by a management company that only does long term rentals but otherwise homes should be owned by people.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] RagnarokOnline@reddthat.com 42 points 1 year ago

I don’t know how I feel about this. On one hand: I dislike the trend of commercial companies buying up living space to turn around and rent it out to disruptive short-term tenants.

On the other hand: I don’t want to have anyone else present in my rental with me because that’s creepy.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

That's the point.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago

If you and I stay in hotels, people who work there will be able to afford to live near there.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

They want you back in a hotel

[-] krellor@kbin.social 89 points 1 year ago

They are trying to address housing shortages. The hotels might benefit, but so does everyone else because it effectively bars commercial operation of AirBnB. No landlords with 50 units etc.

load more comments (44 replies)
[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

I want them back in a hotel too.

[-] li10@feddit.uk 31 points 1 year ago

Yes, where they should be.

If you’re travelling somewhere then stay in a hotel, it’s what they’re for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

And why is that a bad thing?

It's the same as ride-sharing ... which, when it started, was advertised as a cheaper alternative to taxis/cabs but that's no longer the case.

I use taxis instead od ride-share because taxis are regulated and they have to buy licenses. Does this make them better? Not really, but they are contributing to the local economy through the tax base ... and that alone does make them better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

So basically they decided to ban Airbnb. I wouldn't be surprised if hotels lobbied for this

[-] li10@feddit.uk 125 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t be surprised if people living next to Airbnb’s pushed for this as well.

It’s horrible having holidaymakers show up to an otherwise residential building/area.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

NIMBYism is the reason the housing market is fucked.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 28 points 1 year ago

While you're not wrong about that sentiment, it's misplaced in this context. Partyers and holidayers make for awful neighbours.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] merridew@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago

Zoning laws exist for a reason.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 year ago

airbnb has a lot of hate from a lot of directions in NYC. Hotels, yes, but also from renters and homeowners.

Airbnb units remove long term rentals from the market, in a city which is desparately short on affordable, middle, and even luxury housing units.

Airbnb units in condos and coops (which usually violata the bylaws) create noise and safety conditions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mdotaut801@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago
[-] Throwaway4669332255@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I think these aren't thought out.

One way to improve them might be to make them only apply to hosts with more than one property. Like if I own a home I should be able to rent it out.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

the issue is that it's not individuals renting out their homes, it's corporations that rent or purchase many apartments and then put them on air bnb. additionally, landlords leave apartments vacant for many months. both of these factors make renting harder and more expensive in nyc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
583 points (100.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS