658
submitted 1 year ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 237 points 1 year ago

It shows that "no rent control" basically means "your landlord can throw you out at any time without notice" by raising rent to a ludicrous amount. It completely undermines all other tenant protections. Even conservatives should be supporting at least modest rent controls to prevent cases like this.

[-] extant@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

Most conservatives are middle class small business owners and landlords, this is why they are always supportive of "small government" it's just a dog whistle for unregulated market.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago

I saw a documentary that spoke to some Twump (sic) supporters who lived in a shithole building that they didn't realize was owned by the Kushners. I can't recall anything else about it that might help identify it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 year ago

Modest is what we had before. Never vote Conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 223 points 1 year ago

Landlords are parasites on society.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

You can't afford to buy. If not for landlords who would you rent from? Where would you live?

The idea that if there were no landlords you'd be able to afford a house is absurd.
I agree corporations should be limited in how many single.family homes they are allowed to buy but this whole "all landlords are scum ". Schtick makes u look pathetic and ignorant of the facts.

[-] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 166 points 1 year ago

When people trying to purchase their first home are outbid constantly by investors (corporate or not) who later try to rent out that same space at more than the first time buyer would be paying on their mortgage then no, you daft idiot, they are not providing a service.

This whole lAnDlOrDs ArE oUr FrIeNd shtick makes you look pathetic.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 1 year ago

If not for landlords who would you rent from?

public housing is a thing, you know

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago

The reason so many can't afford to buy is because so many houses are bought purely to be rented back out again, if no landlords existed housing prices would drop and more people could afford to buy.

For those who still couldn't, as others have said - public housing

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] uis@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

If not for landlords who would you rent from?

If not for landlords who would suck all supply?

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] jcrm@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago

Public housing. That's where you rent it from. Landlords serve no purpose in society that can't be solved in better ways.

For example, I would gladly purchase my apartment. The rent that I pay would be roughly equal to mortgage payments on the approximate value of the unit. But instead I'm stuck paying that amount so someone else can own it. Just cut out the parasite in the middle.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] PaganDude@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago

Landlords provide housing the way scalpers "provide" tickets. The solution for people who need can't afford to buy or who only need short term accommodation is public housing.

The CMHC used to provide funds to the provinces which would then build big public housing units with affordable rent. This provide a check & balance to the free market, keeping rents and house prices from skyrocketing. But then in the 80s and 90s, both Conservative and Liberal PMs successively defunded that aspect of the CMHC to solve budget issues, and those properties were destroyed as they reached their "maturity" date, regardless of whether the building was still usable or not.

I lived near one of them, located here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/SG2kkXeVsp3Nia2RA Check out the street view and click "see more dates" for 2012, that's housing for 90+families. Then in 2014 it was closed for demolition. And today it's still an empty grass lot. Almost 10 years as a Govt-owned empty lot, instead of affordable housing, because those Govts kept promising "market solutions" to housing problems.

But it turns out the "problem" with housing was letting the "free market" turn it into another Tulip Bulb craze, instead of keeping it an affordable necessity

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] countflacula@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago

Please tell us more about how the types of people who decide to jack rent up to absurd levels when given the slightest push back are actually a good thing for society.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago

if not for landlords who would you rent from?

"We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Decomodify housing. Like tax owning a home past like the 3th one so high it would destitute someone as rich as Musk in a month. Watch everyone who uses property for investment panic sell and crash the market into oblivion. The people who want to own a home can now do so and the rest can be bought up by the government for cheap to convert into public housing. Ez affordable housing and renting in one swoop.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've NEVER met a landlord who had low prices, just government subsidized low income housing. Even large real-estate companies/ banks tend to offer better prices. Landlords fucking suck. Investing in a house, is like "investing" in water. You're just spending money to increase demand and make money, on SOMETHING PEOPLE NEED TO LIVE.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

You can’t afford to buy

Because landlords are buying all the properties?

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Found the landlord. If not for tenants, who would you and your estate agent squeeze for every possible cent, cutting every possible cost along the way so you can more horde wealth, buy more homes and get fat at other people's expense.

Nobody that wasn't bleeding renters would try and look reasonable by saying "corporations shouldn't be able to own too many houses".

The people complaining are not the ones who should be ashamed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 149 points 1 year ago

Same thing is happening to me right now (UK). LL inherited a portfolio of mortgage-free properties a few years back, immediately jacked the rent up on them all. I tried to haggle what imo was an egregious rent increase (notified middle of the year after asking for a minor repair), we agreed on a price then he served me notice to quit; via the letting agent, not a peep or thanks from the LL after I've put ~£90000 into his familys' accounts over 13 yrs.

Of course, I can pay someone elses mortgage, but when I apply to a bank for one myself, I can't afford it.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago

I can pay someone elses mortgage, but when I apply to a bank for one myself, I can’t afford it.

But when you can't afford it any longer, the landlord is free to replace you with someone who temporarily can. That's the difference!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] virku@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago

Here in Norway ut is illegal to raise rent more than once a year and maximum by the current consumer price index. If the rent isn't raised a year you don't get to raise for that years CPI.

[-] nikt@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago

There is a similar rule in Ontario, but it doesn’t apply to buildings built after 2018.

This exemption was put in place as an incentive for more rental units to be put on the market (or to enrich developers and landholders, depending on your political stance).

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 year ago
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Regardless of who is in the right or wrong here, please don't post personally identifiable information if the source is not public.

While it's important to push for justice and fairness, there's a distinction between advocating for fairness and doxxing / calling for mob justice. We don't have formal rules for this stuff yet, but use your best judgment and report any comments that veer into harmful territory.

I'll try to post a discussion thread on proposed rules sometime in the future, but this seems like a good one to bring up in the meantime. Feel free to share thoughts, and thank you :)

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago

Maybe not here, maybe not us. But that landlord's name ought to be made public by the media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Before mobbing the landlord, it would be a good idea to know what's the real story behind this. Maybe the sisters were assholes. We don't know that.

[-] Dezvous@beehaw.org 52 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

No landlord is a good person. The sisters, even if assholes, doesn't excuse the fact that the landlord is also an asshole simply by being a landlord.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 46 points 1 year ago

When escalation of this magnitude is your solution, you shouldn't be surprised when your clients respond with violence.

[-] leaf@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

This absolutely should not be legal

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

It doesn't really help the case that they show a picture a sky line dream apartment, but still that price is ridiculous and obviously there to drive them out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] graycube@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago

Does that mean the landlord has to charge the next tennant that rate, or was that a special rate just for them? Can they charge different rents fir different people based on whether they like the tennant?

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago

I was wondering thia too. Without control, they can probably just lower it again once the tenants leave.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Sounds like they're living in a high demand luxury apartment with a great view from the looks of it. Landlord just told em they fucked around and are going to find out now. The price is clearly because they don't want to deal with them anymore.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago

God damn, no sympathy at all eh? Yes they're yuppies, but you're going to bat for a punitive rent hike because "they probably deserved it" or something like that? That's cold.

These women are losing their home because they argued with a landlord over raising rent. That's some Dickensian shit right there.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They must have really pissed off the landlord. It doesn't say what they asked for in the lease agreement changes... Or what they said to him when they "complained" when he raised the rent initially by a smaller amount.

Still ridiculous that it's legal to raise rent by that much, but oof, if you're in one of those buildings, be nice to your landlord.

Edit: i think people are taking what I said the wrong way - I'm saying with the way things are, if landlords can get away with this, they hold all the power!

Edit2: I guess I'm the bad guy here, but I recommend you focus your rage on Ford who set this shit up in the first place.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

raised the rent initially by a smaller amount.

You write 'doubled' funny.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
658 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
390 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS