253
Trump vows to end ‘madness’ of EV push
(thehill.com)
Old man yells at sky
Old man urges investment in horses, buggys, and oats.
I don't know, all those liberal coffee shops are selling oat milk. Can't the horses eat something more Republican like corn?
Literally. He really should be mad at climate change for fueling the need for EVs.
But then that’s admitting that climate change exists, and then it’s a slippery slope to saying he was trying to start an insurrection and coup, and that’s a big no-no for Dolan Trumpet.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gas would have gotten away with it if it wasn’t for that pesky pollution.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Only the fucking Republicans would end up against innovation.
The anti-progress culture war bullshit is overdone and tired. Give it a rest and let everyone else move on without you.
anti-progress culture war
And anti-science across the board. War on education from elementary school to college. Very unfortunate.
Republicans hate change. They hate that they no longer run the show, though they're doing what they can to get that power back. They hate that the old white man doesn't have the strangling grip on society it once had. They hate that minorities and women have rights, though they're doing what they can to change that. They hate open boarders and people who feel more themselves as a member of the opposite sex. They hate what America was on the path of becoming, which was a place that truly welcomed any and all people.
The fascists don't want to let anyone else alone, though.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If we nuke the sun, we don’t have to worry about solar power. It would also combat global warming, which is totally not real. And if we just ban the sale and possession of Lithium, we can get rid of those polluting electric cars. It’s not regulation, it’s for the children.
I hate everything about this sentence and the very real line of thinking that Republicans use. Because who else uses it besides Republicans?
load more comments
(1 replies)
He's not gonna do shit.
He'll only do something if he can force some of the production line through a Trump subsidiary so he can get a cut.
Come down to the Trump™ Pump station and get some gasoline
He will yell, get media coverage, wait a few days, somehow declare victory and never speak of it again. Its the same playbook can we just ignore him until his court dates?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump is going to prison, he ain't doin' shit.
Might as well add this to the pile of lies.
I’m just going to leave this here. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/he-lied-ohio-voters-struggle-after-trump-promised-jobs
That's not even consistent with their donor's ideology.
EV's exist to save the auto industry, not the planet.
From MI here, I love my EV and despise anyone who hates on them.
What about those of us who think that EVs only prolong the issue, and that better public transportation for everyone isn't just a good idea, but the best idea for personal well-being, as well as climate change?
Sure, but while I wait for that to actually exist where I live, are you OK with me driving an EV or should I just not leave the house?
I think they should realize that those public transportation have to be powered somehow and that we have to keep developing the technology for EV one way or another because fossil fuel busses and trains are not the future.
I mean, they're already starting to move away from natural resources for busses. Granted, per person per mile, they're already drastically more efficient than than any gass guzzler on the road.
Not too mention that subways and light rail are already electric, and we're moving away from fossil fuel power generation, too.
If we built futures that didn't need cars, with more walkable locations, mixed zoning, safe bike lanes, etc. our current car-centric society could finally disappear.
You should be in favour of EVs. Just large, bus-shaped ones. However private transportation isn’t simply going to vanish. So it’s best to support a transition to EV cars as well
What about those of us who think that EVs only prolong the issue, and that better public transportation for everyone isn't just a good idea, but the best idea for personal well-being, as well as climate change?
I'd tell them to be realistic, and remind them that a large percent of the population doesn't live in dense areas where that type of thing is practical, and that personal vehicles, of some sort, will be required until those larger issues can be fixed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is Elon back from picking fights with Xitter bots yet?
How dare people want EVs! This desire for something Trump doesn't like must be quashed!
The anti-electric / pro-oil propaganda that "conservatives" pass around is really baffling. They have integrated this stuff into their core belief platform. It's nonsense because EVs seem to be a really great option to solve a lot of problems, and you'd think people that complain about gas prices all the time would want to not have to buy gas at all.
All the sense that I can make of it is that Russia is an oil-export economy, and they have been pushing the pro-oil propaganda into the "conservative" thought pipeline for so long that it just became part of their religion.
It’s performative opposition. No one really thinks there’s some kind of actually intellectually coherent views regarding incandescent bulbs, fuel efficiency, or solar power. It’s a conditioned reaction at this point. Sure, the oil lobby will oppose it, but it’s not like Big Bulb is trying to get rid of smart bulbs.
They’ve been conditioned to respond to the talking point of “the government is trying to tel you what to do” to such an extent that Biden could win the next election if he announced a government initiative to stop people from chaining themselves to rocks and jumping into the nearest lake.
It’s more than that. A lot of conservatives think of texas and Dakota when they think of oil. They think of Michigan and Ohio when they think of gas powered cars. They think of Appalachia when they think of coal. And they think of all of this as what energy independence is. Meanwhile they think of California and foreign countries when they think of batteries and renewables. To them a windmill is ugly chinese made crap that will leave them with rolling blackouts when they need electricity the most
More than all that though they think climate change is a lie to convince them to stop living the way they want and to take their jobs and make them subservient to the government. Because even if the democrats are right the new jobs aren’t going to someone who dropped out of high school to mine coal in a rural town in West Virginia. Sure Columbus might get more jobs, but zanesville wont.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Seems misguided as appeal to a big chunk of Michigan voters. The car companies are all retooling lines for EVs as demand continues to increase and they don't seem to be turning over tons of employees to do so. For auto industry workers electrification seems to be somewhere on the scale between an lateral move and a boon.
But I'd think it would still play in Alaska and the gulf states where all the oil drilling and refinement happen. Though I also suspect we'll see hydrogen economy jobs ramping in the gulf states since that's where Toyota has most of the US manufacturing.
Not only are the autos retooling factories to build ev’s they are investing billions in new battery plants. A big part of the UAW negotiations are making sure that future ev’s are made with union labor. EV’s are coming and dipshits like Trump won’t be able to stop it
What's the ten year forecast for fuel prices again? EV is the future, those not on board will get left behind like those in the 20s who refused to switch from the horse to a automobile.
Well he won't have to worry about EVs from his prison cell
Trump is likely trying to persuade Michigan voters
Why would this persuade Michigan voters? Are Detroit auto-makers forbidden from manufacturing electric vehicles?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Elon sat there with a pet leopard.
He seems to have missed doing an entire side of his head with orange makeup.
What a strange strange man.
Can we push some EVs off a cliff onto his head?
And then build functional public transit for everyone.
At this point, ranting against EVs is the equivalent of your crazy old Uncle ranting about how Satan is possessing your Commodore 64 in the 80s. That's how these people look to me now. Long over-the-hill fuckers with nothing better to do than yell at inevitability.
Remember nothing is going to change after all this. It's America and American systems and communities that are fucked, not just trump.
There won't be greener grass on the other side. It's all the same old bullshit.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
253 points (100.0% liked)
politics
20394 readers
2874 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS