347
Protestation (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 weeks ago

Stop couping yourself.
Stop couping yourself.
Stop couping yourself.

Anyone who says they don't like socialism I just tell to stop using public roads moving forward.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 weeks ago

socialism is when the government pays for things, and the more things it pays for, the more socialister it gets

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 18 points 3 weeks ago

socialism is where the government socialisms for things, the more they socialism for, the more socialismier it is.

- Cunk on socialism

[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Then a dictatorship spending 80% of GDP to prepare for war would be a socialist country.

Even if all the money is spend on social issues, only utopian socialism equals this. It's what got Karl Marx so fussy about because he knew the capitalists/monarchs/oligarchs will never allow it to happen for as long as they live. So a next social revolution à la the French revolution he predicted.

Since Marx, socialism is when the means of production is in the hands of the workers and one's income is comparable to one's contribution.

And since Marx didn't have a good idea as to how a socialist government would function as his version did not get off the ground, we now have standard vanguard (SU) and capilliary vanguard (PRC '78) democracies as examples of socialist societies.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

A few corrections:

  1. For Marx, worker ownership is not Socialist. Cooperatives are petite bourgeois structures, the form of ownership must be public ownership, ie equal ownership across all of society, not just the working unit. Countries like Cuba, the PRC, and former USSR all have public ownership as the principle basis of society.

  2. Marx had a decent idea of how Socialism would function, you can read a bit about it in Critique of the Gotha Programme. Lenin and other Marxists took the basis created by Marx and implemented the first major steps towards Communism in real life.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just to clarify, the post you reponded to is definitely paraphrasing famous prof. Wolff joke about exact same topic.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Why do you need to redefine a world that ot's creator defined?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

They are sarcastically pointing out that public roads aren't Socialist.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago

Publicly funded infrastructure and utilities within a Capitalist system isn't an example of Socialism. Socialism is an organization of society where public ownership is principle, ie at least over the large firms and key industries. The US Army is not "socialist," it's an arm of the state within a Capitalist system. Same with roads.

I get what you're trying to say, but I think this line of thinking backfires more often than it helps. Anti-socialists can easily point out that it's the broader system that needs to be viewed, not the discrete element.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Technically lemmy and the fediverse implement socialiam principles

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Open source is inherently socialist

[-] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

The amount of Americans who were trained to misunderstand and hate socialism based on reaganomics but yet want to be Russian is heavily astounding. Americans are the weirdest bullies of the world.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

What does modern Russia have to do with anything?

[-] Partisan@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Cuba being so based, that it did not work.

[-] beveradb@lemm.ee 19 points 3 weeks ago

Hasn't Cuba been crippled by US sanctions and libel for decades?

[-] Partisan@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Sadly yes, but it is still way ahead of most other (in some cases even imperial core) countries in certain metrics.

[-] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, but they've had a lot of success despite that.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Irrelevant, if they didn't want to be embargoed so hard maybe they should have done a capitalism.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Given the fact that the strongest economic power in the world has been fucking with them for decades, and they still manage to keep up on things like life expectancy and education (at times even surpassing the US on the life expectancy), I'd say they're doing pretty well. And looking at neighboring countries with similar histories that aren't getting fucked by the US, but chose capitalism (or had it chosen for them in case of countries like Chile), I'd say Cuba's a pretty good argument in favor of socialism.

[-] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

We do our best to ignore the countries that do have good social policy, or manufacture reasons that social policy doesn't work while ignoring the exact same problems mirrored in our capitalist system exacerbated by disparity.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

The US definitely doesn't ignore countries like the PRC, Cuba, Vietnam, etc that are more rapidly and equitably developing than their peers, it wages active economic warfare if these countries don't play ball. The US Empire needs subjects, after all, so if countries don't bend the knee the US either saber rattles or sanctions them to oblivion.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I know it's a meme, but if it doesn't work because of the USA, then that is one of the reasons it doesn't work.

Edit: and you being angry at me just shows your inability to imagine a way forward. "If the USA hadn't stopped us then it would have worked!" Is as smart as saying pigs could fly only if they had wings.

Edit2: I can't imagine why people would think communists are hateful beings.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago

"The world police is always right, it's their fault for being commies"

[-] ferret@fedi.workersofthe.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

@protestation @Valmond Bet you think black people must be inferior because they were enslaved by Europeans, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The USA had better fossil fuels and by better fossil fuels I mean more coal.
The Soviet Union fell because it mostly had to rely on oil and had no solution against the US petrodollar scheme.. China is already doing better with just half as much coal.

Even cultist theocracies could win against communism with enough energy/electricity sources packed in a small area that can't be easily transported.

This coal advantage is quickly disappearing as solar power and to a lesser extend, wind power, is making inroads. By 2030, coal will be a curse like oil as it's easier to transport than solar and wind, which aren't transportable at all.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You say it like the fall of the USSR regime was a bad thing.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago

Undeniably it was a bad thing that the Soviet Union fell. 7 million people died because of it falling, and we lost one of the most progressive countries from an international perspective. Never has a country been so firmly dedicated to anti-Imperialism and decolonization with the actual real power that the Soviet Union had to back that up, it not only came with huge victories for the working class internally, but also supported Cuba, Palestine, Algeria, Korea, China, defeated the Nazis (90% of Nazis killed during WWII were from the Soviets), and more.

So yes, the USSR falling was a bad thing.

[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It was a bad thing.
Not only because of the things REEEEvolution said. Child prostitution, bread lines (which came AFTER the fall), wars and a fall of life expectency, but I live in Western Europe and the dismantling of the Soviet Union also triggered the dismantling of social democracy and rise of both fascism and rainbow capitalism in my own country and I sometimes don't know which one to be more disgusted by.
Well fascism of course, but like religious people I consider their ideas to be so outdated that I'm often more amused and amazed by their stupidity and backwardness than I am frustrated by them during an age where China currently is undeniably the largest superpower in the world.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

it was a good thing - what came after it was a bad thing.

ultimately what happened is that, confronted with either advancing the revolution or burocratizing the party cadres, the ussr chose the last one. the result could be no other than the restoration of capitalism. so far just cuba seems to be resisting this trend, but for how long?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago

"Advancing the revolution" of course being a shorthand for "spending all resources on exporting it like Trotsky wanted, only to end up failing externally and internally" rather than building up production so that it could actually afford to support revolution around the world, which it did in cases like Cuba, Palestine, Algeria, and more.

The dissolution of the Soviet Union was a complicated factor, but it was by no means because they chose to develop, rather than get themselves wiped out immediately like Trotsky wanted. There are many Socialist nations today, the PRC is by far the biggest and most relevant example on the global stage, it isn't just Cuba.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Good thing the US empire is dying then.

And without any other country "liberating" it either. That's just how well fascism works.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The USA have for sure went full crazy/wannabe-fascists, but I doubt they are "dying" just yet.

[-] Nikki 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

rome didn't fall in a day :shrug:

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
347 points (100.0% liked)

Communism

2209 readers
57 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS