98

What is the explanation for high technology in Star Wars?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago

I absolutely love Star Wars - I saw the first movie four times in the theatre back in 1977/78 as a kid.

But let's be clear: Star Wars is "cowboys and indians in space." (Yes, that's a dated and culturally inappropriate comparison - it is also perfectly appropriate for the era.)

Technology has never played a significant part in it - light sabres are magic swords, FTL travel is a well-worn convenient trope that 'just happens' (unless it doesn't). Droids are servants.

Basically, tech has never been a core aspect of the SW world, mostly because the show has never been science fiction.

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

* Star Wars is "cowboys and indians and samurai in space."

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you ever end up watching Andor, they explain more of how the empire mines entire planets to collapse acquiring minerals they need, destabilizes galactic views of planets to ensure resistance would be minimalized. It also goes into how the weakness in the DeathStar was created and how some engineers were essentially enslaved/forced into to building it. Believe they gun down most of the lead engineers in Rogue One.

Edit: light speed is really one of the only non-defined technologys I find. But they have tractors everywhere, so I assume the point is with mass amounts of energy... You can do near anything

(I meant reactors, but tractors are pretty funny so I'm leaving it)

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

show

*movies

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I love this eye opening take. Thank you.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Star Wars is a nice movie but it's a pretty mediocre SF. They mix very low and very high technology in mostly absurd ways. You have FTL and lasers but robots are mostly shit, AI is very basic and its use weirdly limited, warfare looks pretty much like today, only in space. I know they did it like this because of cinematography but as a SF it's just not that good. So I really wouldn't bother trying to rationalize the tech. It's mostly like this because "it looked nice".

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

warfare looks pretty much like today, only in space

not even that. Star wars warfare looks like what someone from the boomer generation thought warfare looked like in WW2. But really it's what movie warfare from WW2 looked like, because showing actual war would confuse and bore people. lucas was enamored with serials.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 days ago

I meant "today" in SF sense, like current century vs some time 1000 years from now :) Of course your right, the battle scenes were inspired by WW2 movies.

My favorite SF warfare descriptions come from Banks. Battleships firing at each other from light years away or hiding inside suns, everything controlled by AI, microsecond long battles. Absolutely not adaptable to screen.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

banks / culture series offers a lot of fascinating insights. but yeah, hard to adapt for movie audiences... similar to the constraints of storytelling and level of nerdistry you can cram into a film frame... I felt the same way about Tom Clancy's mil-fantasy level of intense inspection about the hardware and users motivations... but he rarely went full silly like Dale Brown with the execution, but very little of clancy's obsession with detail gets into the films made from his IP.

thinking about these tropes has led me to think I need to make some games exploring them heh

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 3 days ago

Yeah, Star Wars isn't science fiction at all. It's fantasy.

We have just come to associate spaceships with science fiction. But in Star Wars there isn't the least bit of science behind the technology.

[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Even Andor is true to that formula.

In one part, two characters are speaking over "radio" comms using code talk - presumably in case there are any Empire operatives listening in. And prior to that they kept missing each other because they weren't at their radios at the same time. Derp!

So you've got hyperspace travel and laser guns, but no data encryption, or text messaging. Alright then.

Except of course, they do have those things when the plot calls for it, and that's another reason to consider it fantasy. In most sci-fi the rules stay pretty consistent, but in fantasy it's flexible.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

so re: encryption - if you can muddle your messages meaning and transmit in unencrypted mode, that convo can hide in the huge volume of calls happening all the time.

once you go through the trouble of encrypting it and running it through spectrum hopping and other security methods, you're simply pointing two REALLY BIG FUCKING ARROWS at the convo participants that say "THESE GUYS HAVE SECRETS THAT SHOULD BE REVEALED WITH BRUTAL METHODS", your encrypting the messages actually draws attention.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 11 points 3 days ago

Scientists doing shit in the future?

[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

*in the past! :)

("A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away")

[-] Trollivier@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Peter Griffin explained it well.

"In the future, but somehow, in the past".

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 3 points 3 days ago

I stand corrected !

[-] toddestan@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago

I get the impression in the Star Wars universe that technological advances have slowed to a near halt. All of the tech is really old, and very little has changed for quite some time. A brand new X-wing or lightsaber or landspeeder isn't all that different from one that was built 50 or even 100s of years ago. That's one of the reasons why stuff in Star Wars looks so used - as tech doesn't go obsolete, stuff ends up staying in service until it's completely worn out and every bit of life has been squeezed from it.

That's why you don't really see where the technology comes from - the big innovators, discoveries, etc. are long in the past. Though we do get to occasionally see factories and manufacturing facilities where things are being built.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

brand new X-wing or lightsaber or landspeeder isn't all that different from one that was built 50 or even 100s of years ago.

If you want to get extremely weird... The Old Republic takes place 3600 years before the original trilogy.

Tech is mostly the same.

Compared to 3600 years in reality, we went from pooping in a hole to pooping into a magic toilet that sings you songs while spraying you with water.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

pooping in a hole to pooping into a magic toilet that sings you songs while spraying you with water.

which then sends the poop where? down a hole.

it's holes man, holes all the way down

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I always had the impression that the advanced tech takes a large amount of resources not readily available everywhere. The rebels are scrounging for resources from any place that defects or will trade with them, while the empire is free to demand, raid, and liberate whatever supplies they needed. Part interchange is going to be more important to rebels strapped for material, so they use all similar, basic, reliable stuff. We see lots of shinier, smoother equipment in the cities where luxury is accessible and full of variation. Meanwhile, the vast shiny imperial hangars are comfortably stocked with lots of clean ships for all different roles.

The shitty robots never feel that far off from the US military. There's all kinds of should-be-obsolete equipment that sticks around just because it fills a role (usually one role) and it still works. Regarding the low quality of their performance and capabilities, I'd imagine microprocessor manufacturing is still hard without perfect conditions. Clean rooms, electron microscopes, and general precision well beyond human visual capability. In our world now, if China were to try to take Taiwan by force and the chip manufacturers really do blow up the facilities, we're screwed. Globally. It'll set us back decades because that'll reset chip size and density. Even if we magically restart facilities that used to be around, they'll be on the older, larger architectures we can't fit in ourr pockets

So, basically, what we've seen coming from most of the wartime interactions the US has had with most of the receiving countries. HMMV vs Hilux. 15 different standard guns vs AK-47. Unstoppable convoys vs IEDs. Satellite comms vs horseback messengers. And then the USA still roots for Luke & crew...

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

because that'll reset chip size and density.

It will be extremely devastating, but not decades worth

The main part of the production, the EUV lithography machines, are made by ASML, a dutch company.

It will be expensive and very annoying, but production can be started elsewhere without too much trouble (just very expensive). TSMC is just currently being (imo rightfully) used as a protection against China

But even TSMC is starting to slowly set foot in other regions

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Even if we magically restart facilities that used to be around, they’ll be on the older, larger architectures we can’t fit in ourr pockets

ok so you're not wrong on the fundamentals but... you should know - you'd need to go back to the 80s for the fabrication scale to actually have much effect on the size of devices.

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A combination of increasing size and reducing capability. I'm not saying we can't have pocket-sized phones, but 2 decades puts us at about the Motorola Razor and Palm Pilot

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

that's a good way to put it.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 56 points 4 days ago

It's fantasy, part of the fun is the mystery of this strange looking technology and how old, used, and dirty it is. Makes you wonder, what kind of history did this object see?

Relevant aside: I just learned Lucas renamed Star Wars to Star Wars: Episode IV in 1981, before knowing he'd help make the three prequel films. It was just a stylistic choice, to make Star Wars feel like just a small piece of a larger epic.

Once you explain the mystery of the technology away, or the mystery of the rest of the saga, some of that magic disappears.

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 44 points 4 days ago

The Star Wars universe is full of trillions of sapient, dextrous beings, humans* or otherwise. Just because the inventors don't (necessarily) show up on screen doesn't mean they don't exist.

If you want a "too simplified as to be almost certainly wrong" answer: E.T.

His species are canonically native to the Star Wars galaxy but we don't see them most of the time in the SW lore. Let's assume they're the ones who invented it all. Easy.

I mean, the one we got a movie about didn't seem all that bright, but he managed to build a communicator array out of a Speak-n-Spell, so they must have something going for them.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 days ago

His species are canonically native to the Star Wars galaxy

Not that I don't believe you, but seriously wtf

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

"Trillions" is probably a major lowball, coruscant alone officially a population in the trillions, and when you actually do the math making some estimates based on densely-populated cities on earth it's more likely in the quadrillions.

And there's million of inhabited planets, most not even close to as densely populated as coruscant of course, but there are a good handful of other ecumenopolises (ecumenopoli?) around the galaxy

[-] palebluethought@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago

I don't think I understand the question. People invented it?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

that's so discriminating. are ypu saying aliens aren't people?

from our perspective, everyone in star wars is technically an alien, because it's happening "a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

By the time of the movies humans have had hyperspace travel for something like 20,000 years. Seems it stands to reason the trillions of sentient lifeforms working and communicating during that time would create some cool shit

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In the Lord of the Rings, what is the explanation for swords and other metal goods?

At some point in the past, the arts of smelting, smithing, casting were discovered, refined over the centuries, different races and cultures advanced them in different ways, and eventually led to swords, mithril shirts, magic rings, etc.

Same thing with star wars, in-universe they have tens of thousands of years of history, I think canonically the old Republic was founded 25-or-so thousand years ago, if you go back that far in real earth human history and you're pretty much at the point where a handful of weird wolves are starting to get comfortable enough with humans to let us start domesticating them.

And at that point in the star wars timeline, space travel and other advanced technology is already pretty well-established, so there's probably at least that long again of incremental technological advancements leading up to that point.

Basically they just got a massive head-start on us

As far as how and where the technology is made, we get little glimpses of it here and there, droid factories on Geonosis, corelian shipyards, various mechanics, scrapyards, tinkerers, etc.

But that's all just kind of backdrop. Star wars is a space opera adventure thing, not a mockumentary about the history of lightsabers and hyperspace drives, or a how-its-made for blaster pistols and gonk droids. It wouldn't make sense for most star wars media to really go into depth about that kind of stuff and probably would piss people off if they did (not that most star wars fans don't exist in a perpetual state of being angry at star wars about something anyway)

You wouldn't go into a Fast and Furious movie expecting a whole history and mechanics lesson on automobiles, the movies are focusing on a handful of people who (race cars? Fight terrorists with cars? I really don't know I've actually never seen any of them) there's a whole in-universe world around them where all of those things happened/are happening out of sight and out of mind but it's not directly relevant to the plot so it gets kind of glossed over, you can just assume most of the history and engineering stuff has been handled by people somewhere off-screen at some point in time.

Same with star wars, there's untold trillions or more people scattered across millions of inhabited planets working dead-end jobs making widgets that have built on millennia of science and technology, but the stories focus on a handful of freedom fighters, smugglers, soldiers, warrior monks, etc. who mostly just use those things and probably don't have much more idea how their hyperdrive works than you do about the alternator in your car.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] br3d@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

A few years ago I'd have jokes about data ports being the same fitting as power sockets, but USB-C has ruined that

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some of their technology is vastly ahead of ours, other technologies are way behind. The behind stuff is far more interesting. Comms in Star Wars is weird and anachronistic with other tech in the show. Getting clear signals for comms seems nearly impossible.

I also get a giggle out of tech used in the show only to drive plot: like how protagonists can scan ships for life forms but protagonists also only power down ships to evade the eye of a passing baddy ship.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Anacrhonistic?

They have instantaneous duplex comms, over millions of light year distances, without line of sight! That's FTL communications.

It is modeled after the style of early radio comms for the cinematic drama, but technologically speaking they would be so far advanced from us that it might as well be magic.

[-] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

It's been around for tens of thousands of years, getting added to, modified and improved upon, by every culture that uses it.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Same place any technology comes from I suppose.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Didn't one of the new movies have a whole thing about the mil-industrial complex?

Unless otherwise specified, my assumption is that laborers working for oligarchs made the tech

[-] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 days ago

And how do they know which button to press?

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It’s like most technology today. You just randomly keep pressing buttons until something happens, then memorize what you did to get there. There really is logic in most of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40906 readers
887 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS