The good thing about this is that I will never attract these guys.
Tell me about your philtrum.
It... exists
Wrong answer! You're a -10/10, now you will never know my girth
That's fine, I know my own
Party on, girth.
Oh no your lack of belief in my actractiveness to you has made me attracted to you.
What do you do?
Roll a d20 this is a DnD scenario now.
Ew, well I am not attracted to you, internet stranger.
Wait, what if you were a woman? That would be less icky.
Ugh comments like this prove humanity has gone backward.
I am bored all of these are acceptable answers...
This is satire, right?
right?
It's not. That subreddit is garbage. The mods legit ban people if the user rates people higher than the mod wants.
No
MFers out here rating women like they're dogs at fucking crufts
You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"
You get these guys in a room with any objectively good-looking woman in real life, and they would freeze up.
They don't freeze in fear. They freeze because they are analyzing that philtrum.
they have a point
clearly cute nerdy girls with glasses or tomboys are superior smh 😤😤.
I don't care if it's knitting or being a tank mechanic, a girl nerding out over her interests is hella cute.
Or anyone else, for that matter.
100%, nerding is hot. That look of excitement and focus does a whole lot.
Right? A person telling you all about that thing they're passionate about is straight up beaming when they do it, I love it.
why did you have to expose me to this nonsense
I’m tentatively giving her an 8 but I need to see the MRI and CT scan to be certain.
No way, please tell me that subreddit is satire 😱
nah unfortunately it's a safe space for incels
Is that why the text they wrote was so disturbing to read? Have they lived in an echo chamber for so long that they think it’s okay to talk about a person like they’re a cadaver. F’ing creepy
On one hand, rating peoples' appearance is the whole point of that subreddit, but on the other hand... My God, do these guys have a talent for making it disgustingly creepy.
I wouldn't even expect actual cosmetic surgeons to talk like that.
They rate according to extremely rigid rules which, aside from being racist, are ridiculously unfair.
What do you have to look like to achieve more than a 7? A biblically accurate angel?
Totally would hit that.
Yes. Specifically 
Too many eyes but not fat or disfigured. 4/10.
The whole thing is designed to allow them to call people (especially women) "mid". They arbitrarily chose to use a gaussian distribution pattern so they had an excuse not to give anyone a score beyond 6s.
But real answer is be a hugely successful fashion model who the sub creator found attractive. Then their "objective rating standards" would include arbitrary criteria to bundle your face in. The whole sub could be replaced with a trivial ML model if it were actually about just giving their "objective" ratings. The internal weights used by the ML model would make about as much sense as the crap spouted in the screenshot.
shes pretty im envious
Actually she's quite a 8 or 9 rather for my score. You should checkout my ratemywomen page as well /s
oh yeah this is why im sapphic
I know most Lemmy user's have a hate boner for Reddit for many other reasons than this, but IMO all of the /r/AmIUgly, /r/AmISexy, /r/rateme, and other rating subreddits are an absolute cancer on the site.
90% of posts are from new accounts with questionable verification methods, with the others being people trying to shill their OF profiles. I can accept that, but what really boils my piss is that almost all of the comments follow this pattern:
Obviously, these subs are going to exist, but they just make me end up hating people, because it's always the same pattern.
this is actually insanity...
Idk she’d be prettier if she talked to a therapist about her insecurity in her appearance
I vaguely remember evidence posted to reddit that the whole r/truerateme sub was started by 4chan incels to try and lower women's self esteem. Part of the plan was to post photos pretending to be super conventionally attractive women and give them low ratings anyway. IDR how conclusive it was in terms of proof, but it seemed more likely than not to me at the time.
That sub also had a "guide" to their rating system posted. I looked at it once, and the absolute lowest ratings were like burn victims or women with noticeable physical disabilities (which is in itself not a cool sentiment), but they had "example photos" of conventionally attractive female celebrities rated at like a 3. Their whole criteria were either subjective or inscrutable above that: you could randomly shuffle most of the chart and it would make as much sense, even if you bought into their idiotic logic (which again, you should not).
Anyway, attraction is way more subjective than any of these shitstains would have you think and everyone can be someone else's favorite.
Dudes out here comparing phrenology notes like that shit still valid.
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
